Please Stop Texting!

[instantnoodles]

I guess we'll never date then because I ain't calling your ass.

Women either go along with my ways.. or I don't date them. End of story.

The story has just begun.

 

[Maximus Rex]

Every girl you approach WILL NOT have sky high interest level in you right off the bat, while others will. Celebrities are in a different category because of their status. And even if you want to run with that, the girl's interest level isn't HIGH because she genuinely likes the celebrity, she wants to brag about it to her friends - she wants to feel important.

Dude, it's the same difference. She'll back to her friends and be like, "I met this really cool and interesting guy. He just seems different from everybody else. There's something about him." Isn't that why were on this site, to learn how raise a chick's interest level to a place where it normally wouldn't be?

In my opinion its weak game to ONLY go after the girls that show high interest off the bat or tons of IOI's, fuvk that. Go after the girls YOU want.

Potna, you just contradicted yourself. Isn't one of the core philosophies of game is only spend time on woman that are GENUINELY ATTRACTED TO YOU? Take my example of the chick who I waited a month to call back. When school let's back in, sooner or later I'm going to see her and it's obvious her interest in me is very low. Suppose I meet a chick that's I'm talking to on the phone and she's getting me major cooperation. Who should I spend my time on? According to you, I should devote time to the former chick in hopes that I'll be able to raise her interest level. **** makes no sense.

With this is in mind, understand that MOST women who are in the 18-30(ish) range will only text you at that point. You might have a girl who won't answer her phone, but text you and still agree to see you for the first week or two. Then as her interest level increases, you will see her actions change.

1) But doesn't this cede control of the frame to her? If I do this, I'm not only allowing her to control the interaction, but I'm also setting a bad precedent.

2) Suppose I do this texting thing, I'm not foolish enough to believe that I'm the only person she's texting. I have to assume that she's also texting three or maybe four other people and one of the three or four people maybe the guy that she does have high interest in. I'm at point in life where I'm not trying to do what everybody else is doing, and everybody else is texting. Texting a chick when she can realistically be having three or four simultaneously conversations is analogous to a pose down in a body building competition, (when the other body builders are stepping in front of each other trying to vie for the judge's attention.) Miss me that sh*t, if a chick isn't willing to give Rex 100% of her attention, then something went wrong in the initial sarge and I need to figure out what when wrong, so the next time I holla at a chick, she's prepared to talk to me when I call.

 

[zekko]

Frankly, at this stage, calls are annoying. And hell, I even get pissed off if I get a voicemail. It's like damn, now I gotta go through all these prompts to check a voicemail that just tells me that you called and that I should call you back.

Totally agree. I have friends who don't text and they leave me voicemails. It is extremely irritating, as you say, to go through the steps of checking the voicemail, then actually stop and listen to the damn thing. And usually they blather on too long when one short sentence would have done the trick. Or even better they could have left me a text which would have accomplished the same thing except I could have read it in about half a second and been done with it.

And phone calls, ugh, they're even more irritating. If I want to talk to someone I'd prefer to see them in person. Otherwise, I have other things to do. A quick text fired off is much more efficient, and that's the real key, that's what interests me, and that's the reason texting is so popular.