Captain said:
I laugh at the boys who think that escorts are cheaper than dating real women. They're only cheaper if you're a chump who rains money and gifts and expensive dinners on some woman you're seeing casually.
Actually, escorts are way cheaper if you've got a decent job and understand the concept of opportunity cost. Let's say you're a lawyer or doctor who bills several hundred bucks an hour. Hell, forget that...let's say you are an average Joe who makes $30-40 an hour and can either work over time or get a second job. The cost of fvcking and escort is therefore somewhere around 4-5 hours worth of work for the average guy and somewhere around one hour for a well-to-do guy. Now are you telling me that you can get into a woman's pants after having spent less than 5 hours with her (including
everything - pick up, phone calls, going on dates, driving around, etc.) Even if were are talking about a relationship, you'd have to spend time doing sh*t with your girlfriend, like going out, "cuddling", talking and texting on the phone, and so on if you want to fvck her. Not many women will let you simply show up at her place, stick it in her, and then say "see you next time" and leave. All of this time could be spent working, advancing your career, pursuing your hobbies or doing other things that are productive or fun.
Also, you have to keep in mind that escorts tend to be hotter than average women (no one's gonna pay money to fvck overweight Suzy, the soccer mom next door). And of course, if you want to fvck a hottie, the time and money that you need to invest into the process increases astronomically.
All of this is completely aside from other benefits of using a hooker: guaranteed sex, no chasing/games/BS, no need to deal with her later, etc. Now I personally would not have sex with a hooker for other reasons (mostly because of the increased risk of catching an STD), but from the purely economic standpoint, they DO make more sense than girlfriends.
