Paternal "Discrepancy"

[MatureDJ]

Interesting article. Of course, the article presents that the whole social contrivance is to blame the man because his wife did the ultimate betrayal.

http://men.msn.com/articlemh.aspx?cp-documentid=4725722&page=1

 

[aliasguy]

Interesting article. Of course, the article presents that the whole social contrivance is to blame the man because his wife did the ultimate betrayal.

http://men.msn.com/articlemh.aspx?cp-documentid=4725722&page=1

-
-
-

I can't cite any reference here, but I've heard that 10-15% of people walking around have a different "daddy" than everyone assumes.

-
--

 

[WaterTiger]

I believe that a man should NEVER have to pay child support for kids that are NOT biologically his.

I also think he should be able to SUE the "Bio-Dad" for past child support.

I think the wife should be sued for fraud.



But then people say I'm a little blood-thirsty....

 

[aliasguy]

I believe that a man should NEVER have to pay child support for kids that are NOT biologically his.

I also think he should be able to SUE the "Bio-Dad" for past child support.

I think the wife should be sued for fraud.



But then people say I'm a little blood-thirsty....

-
-
--

I'd agree with you Watertiger, that would be just and fair. But it WON'T happen. Justice and fairness have little to do with the family court system as it is now.


It's an income redistribution mechanism, which seeks to push the EASIEST money around. "Father" is the most vulnerable position one can be in (excluding a physically abusive situation.)


Men have no true recourse. I'll admit, fathers have responsibilities. And they should met those. But the system is seriously flawed. and this is only one example of its failings.

-
--