"The Kiss of Death Mistake"

You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?

Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.

One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.

Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Read more...

Parallels between PU "community" and Organized Religion

iqqi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
5,135
Reaction score
82
Location
Beyond your peripheral vision
Lord Shinra said:
I don't see it at all paralleling organized.
While organized religion is a bunch of "Don'ts" the community is a bunch of "Do's"...
1. Don't take advice from women EVER
2. Don't listen to women, they Don't know what they think or want
3. Don't tell her you love her first
4. Don't call too soon
5. well you get the point.

;)


If you can't learn to think for yourself, this site and any religion or cult will gladly take over your soul for you.

Everything you are taught should be taken with a grain of salt, because everyone and every experience is different. Once a person learns what works in what situation, they will be more successful.

Once you start worshipping false idols, you are in for a hard road.
 

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

Bonez

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
304
Reaction score
4
I am a natural observer, I can say that you are absolutely correct. I am horrible at explaining though, so you're stuck with me only agreeing with you.

You as a person are taken into a "religion" on your own terms. You give your time to learn, to be aware, and to pass on any positive messages. WHen you see positive messages you pass them on in a non invasive way at first, and you progressively become more and more forceful with the way you deliver yourself.

As a mass religion, christianity has too much weight behind it, and modern methods of indocrination do not apply. You cannot compare Now with then, without assuming now is only now and not now and the future or now and the past, but only now. Scientology on the other hand is now, nobody knows what it was or will be, same as with pick up you can only assume, so some religions are VERY much like being in the pick up community. When you begin to put yourself in a place where you see yourself as superior to your peers around you, and you succeed in most parts you aren't sucked in to the madness, you actually succeed... e.g. tomkat.

P.S. The entire scientology religion started with hubbard, and dianetics. They use the BCE and AD to correlate to OUR 1950 AD so 1963, is actually 13 AD, kind of convenient to disengaging people from society. Dianetics was seen as mind manipulation back then, and scientology is actually recruiting, and "testing" a more mainstreamed method of gaining new members. They have series of tests for each level that you achieve, you pay to join the new level after you have been accepted, but you can't join if you pass the test. Its not as whackjobish as some people believe in the religion being entirely to sucker people in, its more complex... seduction communitys on the other hand do not go that deep.
 

Francisco d'Anconia

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
15,481
Reaction score
65
Location
Galt's Gulch
comic_relief said:
damn...

Personally, I liked Nietzsche's work because he hated organized religion (not religion, but organized religion and what it would became). I seem to becoming a positive Nietzsche.

comic_relief
You're absolutely right. It's the organized part which is the conduit for corruption into religion. Some religions are able to give guidance in a "WWJD" type of way where the individual is able to come to a decision on their own and then there are others with doctrines which much be adhered to in order to avoid the retribution of damnation.
 
Top