“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

Palimony for just boinking a woman?

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
12,429
Reaction score
5,024
http://www.nj.com/starledger/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-13/12137649544110.xml&coll=1

In a decision described as the first of its type in the nation, the state Supreme Court ruled yesterday that a couple does not have to live together in order for one partner to sue the other for palimony after a breakup.
Let me get this straight. Now, even if a man does not cohabitate with a woman, and he could still be forced to pay her support? Or perhaps if a man tells a woman that he intends to marry her in the future, but he never marries her, it is legally as if he DID marry her.

WHERE IS THE LOGIC HERE?
 

Phyzzle

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
1,963
Reaction score
35
Well, in a way, this is a return to the good ol' days. It used to be that having sex with a woman with the false promise of marriage was itself a felony.
 

vorbis

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Dec 18, 2005
Messages
432
Reaction score
2
Location
Boston
The guy in this story is definitely a complete sleazeball. BUT this judgment is atrocious. I guess he was paying some of her rent?? The state is basically saying that if you mooch off someone long enough then you can sue them to keep mooching them at that level !!! If he had given her no money there wouldn't be a suit!!!
 

edger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
1,874
Reaction score
39
Location
A state in America that'll unmercifully leave you
MatureDJ said:
http://www.nj.com/starledger/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-13/12137649544110.xml&coll=1



Let me get this straight. Now, even if a man does not cohabitate with a woman, and he could still be forced to pay her support? Or perhaps if a man tells a woman that he intends to marry her in the future, but he never marries her, it is legally as if he DID marry her.

WHERE IS THE LOGIC HERE?
This sh*t makes me sick. I can't even read it, really. When the F*CK is this system of pussified men in this country going to wake the f*ck up? It is out of hand, it's been out of hand. I don't understand, don't the men who make and approve of these laws realize they're working against themselves? What benefit do they think they will gain from it? I truly don't understand it.

Men keep working against themselves, it's an ongoing epidemic. It is really a terrible thing. No unity at all in this gender! It's a disgrace! I'm sickened by what I see.

I wish we could all band together on here and start a greivance of some sort, get petitions going, win people over to our side, and organize a huge following, and take it to our Capitols or Congress.

Life just keeps getting tougher for us, no matter what we do with a goddam woman, we're f*cked.
 
Top