HyperAnalyze said:
Banging an average or below average girl should subtract from your total count.
This is one of the most ludicrous things I've ever heard on this site. There is absolutely no reason why any man should give even a fraction of a fvck about what anyone else thinks about who he bangs. If he can get it up, fvck her, and enjoy it then more power to him; land whale or average chick. If a dude is purposely dumpster diving because he's too scared to approach attractive women then that's an issue, otherwise go ahead and ravage that 6 and be able to look yourself in the mirror with pride the next morning. I think this is one of the reasons why some men are so unsuccessful with women. They keep chasing after the best of the best when they know damn well it would be in their best interest to lower their standards a bit. Some of these dudes sound like females holding out for Prince Charming. It doesn't make any sense to put ego above happiness. At the end of the day a dude's friends and family isn't going to jerk him off and bust his nut so their opinions are irrelevant.
Majority of posts on SS - Complaining/hating/ not getting sex with women
Number of average lays - 30
Something isn't adding up here. I would suspect the average lay count is half of what is reported, and only by a few people. Overconfidence bias clearly a factor, much like the poll I did a while ago where most people rated themselves above average. Fact: a group of people who are above average in looks and who have gotten sex at least 30 times would NOT be posting the types of threads we see here.
Also who talks about subtracting counts/ total scores? What is this, middle school? Go out there and get laid and stop focusing on this stupid garbage.
These statistics are only from the men who did interviews and stated their number. Most of the men who did interviews are vets or people who actually contribute to the forum instead of whining. I probably need to update it soon. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised though of people were padding their numbers. In any case this is quite entertaining
And to the OP, I think you'll find the average number of lays on here is bi-modal. Some guys will have 100+ and another cluster of guys will have around 5-20.
This is correct. There's some 100s, 80s, and 60s, and then there's the 2-20 with some in the middle.
And this is exactly why such statistic are completely f*cking worthless. There is not skill in laying ugs and fatties. All that's necessary is low self-esteem and a general lack of pride. Every time you bang anything less than a 7, it shouldn't count. Actually, scratch that. It should count, but as a -1 to your overall score.
It can be argued that Joe who laid five 10s is more skilled than Matt who laid fifty 6s. It can also be argued that Joe could've just been lucky, been at the right place at the right time, etc. On the other hand since Matt has been able to reproduce his results 50 times, it is more likely that he knows what he's doing and is therefore more skilled, regardless of the fact that his lays aren't as attractive. Unless the chick is a raging slut its going to take effort to get her in bed regardless of her attractiveness.
