jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
Imagine there are ten men in a room. We all know some will be richer, more confident, better looking, or more socially connected. Some might have women chasing them, others have none. But here’s the thing: nobody in that room explicitly knows who’s who.
And yet… women often do. So the question is: what signals do women actually pick up on to decide which man seems “the best” or "a good pick"?
Beyond money or status, there are subtle cues, presence, for example: how a man walks, talks, and holds his space. Then there’s vitality: the natural energy, youth, and liveliness that shows in his tone, eyes, and expressions.
I used to think it was all about height. But over time, I’ve seen shorter men dominate a room, projecting more authority and power than taller ones.
There are behavioral patterns that objectively attract women, regardless of individual preference.
Not the “subjective” stuff, like body type, face shape, or personal taste, but signals that universally register as attractive or high-value.
For example, when we talk about what women we find attractive, we can separate it clearly:
Objective factors (universal): feminine energy, how she moves, how attentively she listens, low-drama attitude, emotional stability.
Subjective factors (personal taste): body shape, height, certain features, etc.
Even if a woman doesn’t fit a man’s subjective type, if she displays the objective traits, he’ll still feel drawn in.
That is happened to me, and it's happened to you too for sure.
You knowyou're drawn to thin women, but for some reason, that chubby woman there is a magnet for you. She owns the objective traits.
So it stands to reason the same logic applies in reverse. There are objective signals men can project that affect all women on a primal level, regardless of her type or preference.
What do you think those signals are (that women specifically read as objective)?
Let’s try to isolate the objective factors.
We can teach men to focus on developing what’s worth fighting for.
And yet… women often do. So the question is: what signals do women actually pick up on to decide which man seems “the best” or "a good pick"?
Beyond money or status, there are subtle cues, presence, for example: how a man walks, talks, and holds his space. Then there’s vitality: the natural energy, youth, and liveliness that shows in his tone, eyes, and expressions.
I used to think it was all about height. But over time, I’ve seen shorter men dominate a room, projecting more authority and power than taller ones.
There are behavioral patterns that objectively attract women, regardless of individual preference.
Not the “subjective” stuff, like body type, face shape, or personal taste, but signals that universally register as attractive or high-value.
For example, when we talk about what women we find attractive, we can separate it clearly:
Objective factors (universal): feminine energy, how she moves, how attentively she listens, low-drama attitude, emotional stability.
Subjective factors (personal taste): body shape, height, certain features, etc.
Even if a woman doesn’t fit a man’s subjective type, if she displays the objective traits, he’ll still feel drawn in.
That is happened to me, and it's happened to you too for sure.
You knowyou're drawn to thin women, but for some reason, that chubby woman there is a magnet for you. She owns the objective traits.
So it stands to reason the same logic applies in reverse. There are objective signals men can project that affect all women on a primal level, regardless of her type or preference.
What do you think those signals are (that women specifically read as objective)?
Let’s try to isolate the objective factors.
We can teach men to focus on developing what’s worth fighting for.
