New study slams "years of shoddy research" about Red Meat...finds it is not "bad for you" nor is it a health risk

[EyeBRollin]

Again, unless they SPECIFICALLY show this with Grass Fed Organic Beef, I think they are missing the mark by treating them equally. They aren't and from a health standpoint are so different they shouldn't even be considered the same food.

Likely would see much different results with Grass Fed Organic Beef specifically

I don't think they'll ever do a study that differentiates the two. It seems overly specific and difficult to implement. Then there is the socioeconomic accessibility considerations of such a study.

I would speculate the difference is analogous to the differences between wild caught fish and farmed fish. Nutritionally there are some differences but overall they still generally provide mostly the same nutrients. Organic grass-fed beef I am sure is healthier, but probably isn't "moving the needle" as much as you think.

Another analogy that surprised me was comparing olive oil, vegetable oil, and canola oil and their affect on lipids. Olive oil should be much healthier, right? Overall, canola oil lowered lipids the most.. but the difference between all of the unsaturated seed oils (including olive oil) was negligible. The benefit was most pronounced when comparing any of them to a tropical oil like coconut oil.

 

[Obee1]

Yes, I thought that was implied with what I said. Plaque is bad. IF one has plaque, better it is stable than unstable. Statins, for all their bad internet rap, stabilize the plaque.

Back on the topic of red meat - I'd like to see in the future RCTs that examine different types of red meat. Probably far off. What are the differences between pork, beef, lamb, goat, venison, etc. Some religions swear off pork for hygienic reasons. Thoughts?

I'd love to see it for sure. It seems as though most red meat research is by researchers with a vegetarian agenda or a bunch of N=1 "carnivore" types. Most of the red meat research is epidemiological and/or using those dang FFQs. The biggest issues will be finding a big enough sample of people (no tobacco, alcohol, and frequent exercisers) and I would think they would want to track over 5-10 years. So funding is going to be a problem. I missed the final cut for Dave Feldman's study of lean hyper responders and cholesterol. I was told it was geography. He thought it would be a 5 year study. Turns out it didn't take near that long because the machines that measure calcium scores are much better and super sensitive now. Anyway, he couldn't get funding so he crowd funded it then got a University to adopt it. That may have to be how it goes for an unbiased red meat RCT.

I think the problem with pork is that they are natural omnivores. Because of this they were potentially competing for the same food sources as humans. They were also destructive to our farm land and a danger to some of the live stock. I think the hogs that are shot in the wild are better than what we get at the store. As far as commercial pork, some ranchers will throw their garbage into the hog pens for disposal. When they are not eating that, they are getting substandard grains that didn't make it to market. We have forced them to become vegetarian when nature never intended that for them. Because of this they're highly stressed (High omega 6) and get compromised immune systems. So they get shot up with antibiotics. I'll eat it sometimes but I don't think it should be a staple. I certainly don't buy it.

 

[Scaramouche]

Hi Obee,
"I think the hogs that are shot in the wild are better than what we get at the store"Well I don't know about the States,but down here the Wild Hogs are riddled with T.B.....Youngest Son has a thousand odd acres up in the Mountains,Pigs are are a real problem,dangerous too....He hunts them with crossbred Dogs,even made a Leather suit of armour for one...Occasionally He gets a couple of little porkers caught by the Dogs,they grab hold of their ears LOL...These are penned up for six weeks and fed Kitchen Scraps and Oats...Roasted on stones in a Hunghi dug in the ground they are Tasty...An Old recluse up the back of him went missing,they only found his boots!

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Hi Obee,
"I think the hogs that are shot in the wild are better than what we get at the store"Well I don't know about the States,but down here the Wild Hogs are riddled with T.B.....Youngest Son has a thousand odd acres up in the Mountains,Pigs are are a real problem,dangerous too....He hunts them with crossbred Dogs,even made a Leather suit of armour for one...Occasionally He gets a couple of little porkers caught by the Dogs,they grab hold of their ears LOL...These are penned up for six weeks and fed Kitchen Scraps and Oats...Roasted on stones in a Hunghi dug in the ground they are Tasty...An Old recluse up the back of him went missing,they only found his boots!

FYI, the proper way to reply to someone is to hit the reply button so it quotes the post and the person gets a notification so they know you replied.