That's fair - and if you don't care, it doesn't matter either way. A message like that leaves two options, she's sleeping with him or she won't reply.
Just making the note that it was unlikely, to say the least - even AW's I can't believe would go that fast when she hasn't even seen what he looks like (after a year? woah). I'm not seeing signs that she's an AW, either (nor signs against it, but there's just so little contact here..). I'm just seeing a relatively low interest - and the text out of the blue was to see if any interest could potentially build up (in which tennis -> direct could have been a good route). His reply essentially told her that he's interested in one thing from her, and one thing only - and she's not interested in being a f-buddy.
Not criticism, just analyzing the situation a bit more. When you don't care, anything goes, so there's never a wrong move, but just pointing out the avenues that would have had the most likely success rate vs the easiest route.
Just making the note that it was unlikely, to say the least - even AW's I can't believe would go that fast when she hasn't even seen what he looks like (after a year? woah). I'm not seeing signs that she's an AW, either (nor signs against it, but there's just so little contact here..). I'm just seeing a relatively low interest - and the text out of the blue was to see if any interest could potentially build up (in which tennis -> direct could have been a good route). His reply essentially told her that he's interested in one thing from her, and one thing only - and she's not interested in being a f-buddy.
Not criticism, just analyzing the situation a bit more. When you don't care, anything goes, so there's never a wrong move, but just pointing out the avenues that would have had the most likely success rate vs the easiest route.