My intuition tells me it doesn't get better for men with age.....

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Talking about females not males.

I'll admit that there are attractive 30-35 year olds but it's rare and you're pushing it the closer she is to 40.

Maybe if I'm 50 then I'll find the average 30 year old female attractive. But it's generally a pass for me.

I just refuse to believe that he found so many attractive females in the 30-45 range.

+1

There's attractive older women but 30 is gross. Agreed, maybe at fifty.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

What woman has ever peaked at 30? You're telling me that you managed to snipe so many of these genetically odd women that hit their prime that late?

Your average 21 year old is more attractive than the average 31 year old. Which means if you were to tell me that you banged a 31 year old, the chances are insanely high that she wasn't attractive.

I've been here for almost 6 years. I personally think you exaggerate your lay counts and their attractiveness.

+1

Top form smv is 18-23./ its spot on.

30+ hell, even late 20s, epiphany and reality check but gone to kick off.

 

[guru1000]

Top Form, 30 yo



Average form 21 yo




SMV > Age, not mutually exclusive. Age certainly helps but does not supersede genetics (to a great extent).

 

[mrgoodstuff]

PMed the OLD Blueprint.

The only addition is if you are targeting younger girls (21-25), you are capped at stating your online age to be 35-36.

Im in my 40's. My ignorant assumption would be that 21-25s would be more of a pain ass my bottom should be 30 and up. You know the terrain better than me.

How in the hail the 21-25 going to workout when they have their own culture and ideals?

 

[zekko]

Simply put, a cute girl doesn’t do it for me, I need beauty.

This gets tricky, because we're dealing with semantics, and people define words differently: But I've always put high stock on "cute" girls - and by cute I do NOT mean homely. For instance, I prefer the 21 year old to the 30 year old in the pics you posted above, because the 21 year old is "cuter" - IMO.

Along with youth and fertility, I think guys tend to also be attracted to "innnocence", because from an evolutionary standpoint, the fewer guys sperm that is in her, the greater chance your DNA has to survive.

 

[guru1000]

Im in my 40's. My ignorant assumption would be that 21-25s would be more of a pain ass my bottom should be 30 and up. You know the terrain better than me.

How in the hail the 21-25 going to workout when they have their own culture and ideals?

We're close in age.

It seems that way but it has more to do with socio-economic class than age. For example, on average, an educated girl will bring more maturity and depth than her counterpart. Out of 6-7 girls, three are 23, 24, and 24. Two of the three are educated with masters degrees, JD, Doctorate of Pharmacy and hold their own maturity wise. The other is a model with little education, but lives in the suburbs, and despite her job, rarely goes out, doesn't like to party, and has a limited social circle. I get along great with all three with no issues.

Now if the girl is the typical college party girl with a different value system, then no social compatability can form. It has more to do with socio-economic class and current social standing and -influences than age IMO.

 

[guru1000]

This gets tricky, because we're dealing with semantics, and people define words differently: But I've always put high stock on "cute" girls - and by cute I do NOT mean homely. For instance, I prefer the 21 year old to the 30 year old in the pics you posted above, because the 21 year old is "cuter" - IMO.

Along with youth and fertility, I think guys tend to also be attracted to "innnocence", because from an evolutionary standpoint, the fewer guys sperm that is in her, the greater chance your DNA has to survive.

Then it's a subjective argument based on preference.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

We're close in age.

It seems that way but it has more to do with socio-economic class than age. For example, on average, an educated girl will bring more maturity and depth than her counterpart. Out of 6-7 girls, three are 23, 24, and 24. Two of the three are educated with masters degrees, JD, Doctorate of Pharmacy and hold their own maturity wise. The other is a model with little education, but lives in the suburbs, and despite her job, rarely goes out, doesn't like to party, and has a limited social circle. I get along great with all three with no issues.

Now if the girl is the typical college party girl with a different value system, then no social compatability can form. It has more to do with socio-economic class and current social standing and -influences than age IMO.

So your doing better with educated too?

The non educated i do okay if they attracted to my physical but talking doesnt help me with them.

With educated some are attracted to my drive and mindset.

 

[guru1000]

So your doing better with educated too?

The non educated i do okay if they attracted to my physical but talking doesnt help me with them.

With educated some are attracted to my drive and mindset.

I'm not going to judge strictly on education alone, although it helps, but the convo needs to flow and keep me interested. Because after sex, she is dominated, and then what?? If she can't make the rapport flow, I'm not motivated to see her again.

But yes, educated women tend to forge deeper connects if you are a driven and kept man.

 

[zekko]

Then it's a subjective argument based on preference.

The cute vs. beauty bit is definitely a matter of preference.

But I don't think it's debatable that innocence is appealing. Some guys will find sleazy women exciting, but look at this board. Guys constantly bemoan and dislike the way women ride the c0ck carousel, virgins are traditionally highly prized, etc. And as noted before, it all makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint.

 

[guru1000]

The cute vs. beauty bit is definitely a matter of preference.

But I don't think it's debatable that innocence is appealing. Some guys will find sleazy women exciting, but look at this board. Guys constantly bemoan and dislike the way women ride the c0ck carousel, virgins are traditionally highly prized, etc. And as noted before, it all makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint.

I'm attracted to beauty on the outside like in the girl posted, but innocence in her "game." It's a duality very difficult to find as beauty often infringes on her chances to remain "innocent."

However, given the social constructs we are now in, true innocence almost at any age is barely existent (though exceptions exist). All one can do it minimize exposure by extrapolating her notch count by looking at the naivety of her "game."

 

[Who Dares Win]

Top Form, 30 yo

View attachment 1971

Average form 21 yo


View attachment 1972

SMV > Age, not mutually exclusive. Age certainly helps but does not supersede genetics (to a great extent).

The old one on top shows a diva behaviour, is full of make up and shows off expensive brand clothes...

The young one on bottom seems healthier, fertile, brand new in fabrication and more natural and laid back.

Whatever point you wanted to prove it didnt go well, I pick the second one any day...btw first one is photoshopped too.

 

[guru1000]

The old one on top shows a diva behaviour, is full of make up and shows off expensive brand clothes...

The young one on bottom seems healthier, fertile, brand new in fabrication and more natural and laid back.

Whatever point you wanted to prove it didnt go well, I pick the second one any day...btw first one is photoshopped too.

Young one looks like a little boy with a wig to me. I'm drawn to curves and a solid feminine facial structure (high full cheek bones and lips). But, hey, if that's your top form, have at it, she will be much easier.

 

[The_411]

As women get older the fewer there are who are attractive. However, big cities have large contingents of attractive women from
30-40.

As for the OP, 40 isn’t easier per se but men who take of themselves can be attractive because they offer looks, maturity, wisdom.

Of course not every woman in her early to mid 20s will be interested, but a lot of them put up with boring guys, bros, fboys because these women aren’t interested in older men or settle for their social group relationships.

Plenty of hot attractive women who settle for beta cucks or date beta cucks.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Young one looks like a little boy with a wig to me. I'm drawn to curves and a solid feminine facial structure (high full cheek bones and lips). But, hey, if that's your top form, have at it, she will be much easier.

lol someone disprove your point so you turn passive aggressive and implicitly question his manliness...ahahah

The great guru the top form millionaire banging hotties 24/7 who happens to spend his day on an internet forum...sure bro

If you create an online alter ego you should make it more believable not only in words but also in behaviour btw...someone said the previous page that you "exagerate your numbers", I believe he may have a point :*

 

[mrgoodstuff]

As women get older the fewer there are who are attractive. However, big cities have large contingents of attractive women from
30-40.

As for the OP, 40 isn’t easier per se but men who take of themselves can be attractive because they offer looks, maturity, wisdom.

Of course not every woman in her early to mid 20s will be interested, but a lot of them put up with boring guys, bros, fboys because these women aren’t interested in older men or settle for their social group relationships.

Plenty of hot attractive women who settle for beta cucks or date beta cucks.

"Put up with"? I see how they look at it! But usually all they bring to the table is a bad attitude and literally bad luck...

 

[guru1000]

Who Dares Win, not you. Ok ... so you like little boys. Don't fault Guru for your taste.

Now run along fan boy. I already imbued your mind with the Guru stamp in the other thread.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Who Dares Win, not you. Ok ... so you like little boys. Don't fault Guru for your taste.

Now run along fan boy. I already imbued your mind with the Guru stamp in the other thread.

Sure that, you are in this forum everyday 24/7, the only thing you imbue are threads in any possible section

 

[guru1000]

Sure that, you are in this forum everyday 24/7, the only thing you imbue are threads in any possible section

Ok, I'll bite, it's a Monday after all

Guru: Join date 9/20/2008, Months: 134, Posts 4,724, Average posts 1.16 posts per days
Who Dares Win: Join Date 1/16/12, Months 82.5, Posts 4,437, Average posts 1.77 posts per day

Guru: Full Head of Hair
Who Dares Win: Three hair left on hairline and mad at the world for that; hence, all older men must have it as bad as he

Guru: Beautiful women with curves
Who Dares Win: Little boys with wigs

Haha. Always a pleasure friend.

 

[lamath]

Ok, I'll bite, it's a Monday after all

Guru: Join date 9/20/2008, Months: 134, Posts 4,724, Average posts 1.16 posts per days
Who Dares Win: Join Date 1/16/12, Months 82.5, Posts 4,437, Average posts 1.77 posts per day

Guru: Full Head of Hair
Who Dares Win: Three hair left on hairline and mad at the world for that; hence, all older men must have it as bad as he

Guru: Beautiful women with curves
Who Dares Win: Little boys with wigs

Haha. Always a pleasure friend.

Thats a good burn

However it require way too much effort




Im prettty sure some posters exagerating/inventing stories here. So what if

Every 1 is rich here and is a 10 and bang new 18yo.
Im not judging but can see who as better insight than other.
So what if they are vulgar or a bit insulting

No reason to get butt hurt, still good info going around