The point of my post you responded to was not to look at the action itself, but at the dynamics behind the action. Another level, so to speak.
You would be absolutely correct in saying any attempt to be cute or nice, by sending a good morning text for example, will be ineffective along the lines of firing up the passion of a woman's interest. But when I do it, it is not to be cute or nice. It is done to diffuse a ticking time bomb.
A woman will grow frustrated with a man she is highly interested in but remains elusive to her. It gets her hamster spinning and leads to a little resentment that he may be stringing her along and playing games. That good morning text I send is the wrench thrown in to stop that hamster wheel; a wheel that, if left to spin, will eventually create resentment, resistance, sh*t tests, etc.
Where "blue pilled" men go wrong is not in the action itself: saying good morning, buying flowers, writing a song.... all of those cliché, cringe-worthy actions we think of when "blue-pilled" men do these things. Where they go wrong is in the belief the act itself will be effective no matter where, when or why it is being done.
Where society and culture go wrong is in presenting the idea that these acts will win a woman over, while failing entirely on explaining the when or the why behind it. This is what leads "blue pilled" men to believe that it is just the act itself that is effective. And that is what leads them to believe it is all a lie when it fails and that women are hypocrite liars.
The manosphere goes wrong in teaching men these are Disney lies and fairy tales; that a man should never do these things if he wants to get women. (Although I fully support the idea that this is exactly what men here need to hear).
Where women go wrong is telling men this is what they want without explaining how its done. And they can't explain it, because teaching a man how to do it makes it an ingenuine, unsurprising and predictable act that fails to deliver the proper effect.
They are all wrong, because I can tell you with unequivocal, 100% certainty that you can, in fact, do something "blue pill" and yield the true Casanova effect Disney promised to men... BUT ONLY IF you understand when a woman is in the proper state, fully primed and RIPE for the act in so that it will have the proper effect. Once you know when a woman is there, when to apply the "blue pill" move, why you're doing it.... you can bring (and I have brought) women a flower, literally watch the blood rush into their cheeks, their hearts swoon in their eye and those panties will hit the floor faster than lighting, leading to some of the most passionate best sex you've ever had. You will see within days how all of her friends look at you. You will notice other women outside of that immediate circle notice how these women and start to wonder about you too. You will know the true power, potency and longevity of the Casanova effect that will ripple through the world of women, leaving a permanent imprint on any women it touches, snowballing for you and doing most of the work. You can dump that flower girl 3 months later and watch 20 women line up for the same experience, go through all 20 women and then call that flower girl back 5 years later to meet you for drinks, to which she will agree. One flower can have that effect IF you know how to do it.
I seldom talk about this dynamic on this site because it is beyond the scope of it. But it is achievable. It does exist. It's not Disney. It's just extremely difficult to achieve because it often requires an incredible number of failures, experiments, experiences, insights, rare moments of clarity, etc. to get there, and there are few men who go through the proper path long enough to become such men that they can then pass it on.
But it all begins with the dynamics behind the action. Understanding context well enough to make the effective judgement calls on when to do what and why. Once a man begins to operate on that level, it becomes apparent the act itself is not good or bad, will succeed or fail. It is the timing and intent. And that all actions, each and every one, no matter what "pill" they may be classified under, will have a moment at some point where it will be the most powerful aphrodisiac or the most atrocious mistake.
. I think that remembering that women are emotional creatures, and knowing how to strike those emotions is key. When those gushy things are used in the proper context rather than currency as would pay for a hooker, you get their attention and desire. We've all heard that women like a measure of drama in their relationships as they like the fluctuation of feelings that they get. That is why "makeup" or "reunion" sex is so good for them. Even psychology 101 backs it up. Statistically, married couples who argue outright have longer marriages. To me, argue means the guy calling her on her sh1t.
