There's 106 men for every 100 women. 6% more men than women.
Let's say 50 men and 50 women are in relationships. 5 men and 5 women are homosexual. That leaves 51 men and 45 women. So now there's 13% more single men than single women. You've got the top 1% of men, the guys who have some combination of fame, steroid use and cosmetic surgery, an actor would be a good example but also athletes, fitness models, "plain" models, music stars, and whatever else you have. Then you've got the say 9% of men who aren't famous, don't use steroids and haven't had cosmetic surgery but have high status in a local social circle of women and tight game (whether that game is them being tall and good looking or being a master dancer or whatever). Or they're still a small fry 1%er on his way up but have some local clout. These 2 groups are the ones the single women are looking to fvck and they're 10% of 51, so there's 5 of them rounded down (5,1). Let's say they have a harem of 30% of the single women, so they've got 14 out of the game rounded up (13,5).
That leaves 46 men competing for 30 women, giving a male surplus of 53% who are all competing with each other to fawn over the women,
who are really looking for the 10%ers. I don't know and don't really care to find out what the latest gender stats on OLD are, and I haven't been to a club or bar in ages unless you count a boat. So I don't know if it's the right ballpark, maybe the gender ratio is worse in OLD than it is in a club I dunno. I didn't take into account the fact (I think OkCupid has it in one of their blog posts and there are probably more surveys) that most men go after young women, so the male surplus will effectively be greater than 53% for them.
Obviously this is just a bunch of bullsh!t in the end when you just use guesses and stereotypes of people and their behavior. It's just sobering to think about when you get too far down the pvssy hole and forget to put increasing your value and enjoyment first which will turn you into the winner that women want.