You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
that was good :crackup:Last Man Standing said:Gangsters get hos - moneyed men get hos - artistic/ creative types get hos - comedic bastards get hos - intelligent men get hos - political power puppets get hos - athletic types get hos - even the water-boy gets hos!!!
Do you notice a trend?? Good looking Hors are for everybody!!!!
I say you cant ask such a question about looks VS personality.wayword said:All you did was divide 1-10 in quarters.
Anyhow, we all know looks DO matter.
BUT, the real question now is HOW MUCH?
Like, what % of appearance is comprised of physical looks...as opposed to style? 60%? 50%?
Then, what % of attractiveness is comprised of appearance...vs personality, power, etc? 50%?
Let's assume 50% each as an example. That would mean that physical looks comprise 25% of your overall attractiveness.
I'm not sure what the exact breakdown and numbers are, but I think this is a more useful question than "do looks matter?"
And if looks are only around 25%...that means 75% of your attractiveness is basically improvable. Which explains how an ugly guy like Jordan Bratman can still bag a hottie like Xtina. Obviously, he's compensating for his lack of looks in the other 75% of departments.
this is some of the worst advice Ive ever seen on this forum. Are you trying to prevent guys from getting hot babes?backbreaker said:your goal should to make the way you look not an issue.
True, but water is more important than food. You can go longer without food than water. So, not every need is equally important and some would be weighted more than others.God_of_getting_layed said:I say you cant ask such a question about looks VS personality.
They both matter, you need both to be successful with hot women.
Thats like asking "what matters more for an organism's survival? food or water?". and then trying to put them into percentages.
An organism will survive only if it gets both, end of story. You cant try to say water is 75% of its survival, as if it can compensate for lack of food if it gets a good enough water. it doesnt work like that. If it doesnt get both, it eventually dies.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
That is not my life mission, but what I think we would be most comfortable with.Deus ex Pianoforte said:Said the guy who has made it his life mission to convince everyone that they can only date women are equal to or lesser than their own looks. :yawn: