Let’s normalize getting laid

[intricate design]

Every time I see a post about someone finally getting laid, I cringe. Getting laid is not some special event that only “alpha males” can partake in. Case in point - I have a moving business where guys move furniture for me. I employ mostly big black dudes and I routinely see women (house wives) throwing themselves at these dudes and exchanging numbers. It literally happens every single day.

And now you have your “pickup artist” who thinks he’s the hottest thing since sliced bread, yet he feels like he needs to do 100 approaches a week and if he doesn’t, men would never figure out how to get laid.

Guys - people are getting laid everyday and guys who have sexual value to women are constantly getting hit on. This is normal. You aren’t special because some random chick made eye contact with you.

Attractive women have an insatiable sexual drive and they literally have an ecosystem of men taking care of their needs.

And yes, I got the word “ecosystem” from actual women. I’ve written posts in the past about how women seemingly have a validation ecosystem of desperate men. But I didn’t come up with that concept. I got it from women on instagram.

At the end of the day, if you aren’t getting hit on by hot women, then you aren’t attractive enough.

That has to be the litmus test. How many attractive women are hitting on you, and not how many women you are hitting on. Because I see guys get hit on all the time.

Women are always trying to hook up with guys they are attracted to. There’s no stupid game to figure out.

Sounds like the fetish type of women. I’d do everything I can to avoid. Yuck. Just so yuck (puke)

 

[Clockwerk50]

Your reasoning falls apart from the title to the body because it contradicts itself. If sex is already “normal,” happens every day, and is nothing special, then there’s nothing to normalize and yet, your entire post is trying to push this as a social standard.

There are more contradictions in your argument. You claim sex isn’t the goal, yet you repeatedly use it as a key indicator of value: “high-value men get laid,” and those who don’t are framed as low value. There is also a contradiction between effortless success and effort-based success, where you say attraction should come naturally to “high-value” men, while also praising outcomes that typically require social skill, experience, and effort. There are more, but I don’t have time to go through all of them.

Look, the pushback you’re getting isn’t due to misunderstanding but because your argument is built on contradictions, generalizations, and absolutes. I think it’s best to scope your argument more carefully.

 

[intricate design]

Sounds like some fetish group of nasties

 

[tksniper]

Guys do you see? Most of the rebuttals are intellectualized: who the hell thinks about sex? I’ll do you even better. I already know no one has read any posts. No guy who who’s getting laid has read a god damn post.

 

[Clockwerk50]

Guys do you see? Most of the rebuttals are intellectualized: who the hell thinks about sex? I’ll do you even better. I already know no one has read any posts. No guy who who’s getting laid has read a god damn post.

As opposed to an emotional response?

To be fair, your argument is inconsistent. You go from saying sex is “normal and not worth talking about,” to using it as the main measure of a “high value man”, and then dismissing any critique by saying people who discuss it are overthinking or don’t understand real life.

You’re not going to persuade many people when your point sounds like it shifts in the every single minute.

 

[BaronOfHair]

@Clockwerk50 "If sex is already “normal,” happens every day, and is nothing special, then there’s nothing to normalize and yet, your entire post is trying to push this as a social standard"

It's NOT currently normal or even viewed commendably in The Anglosphere. Thus our collective obsession with pet projects like "affirmative consent" and all these efforts to police what happens in the bedroom

 

[plumber]

Guys do you see? Most of the rebuttals are intellectualized: who the hell thinks about sex? I’ll do you even better. I already know no one has read any posts. No guy who who’s getting laid has read a god damn post.

take a look at the different personality types. they are very different. intellectual men will think about everything. that's how they are made. what you can see and do and know just because your are you; does not work for ALL the other men. some be different, not bad, not stupid, but different. things that are clear to you, are a mystery for some others.