You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
That's not how it works. Please refrain from quoting Mr. HIT when attempting to give training advice. Squating isn't goint to make your chest and biceps any bigger. Cite one scientific study that proves this theory right. You can't because it's a bunch of garbage pseudo-science.Originally posted by MindOverMatter
If you don't work out on your legs, you are missing out on something called the indirect effect
Arthur Jones, the father of HIT and the guy who started the Nautilus company, discovered this physical phenomenon in the 1970s.
When a muscle grows in response to an exercise, it will stimulate growth in other muscles. Big muscles will stimulate more growth then smaller ones (hence why squats are so important, as they stimulate a huge muscle group which in turn produces gains in other areas of the body).
Yawn. Yet another Anti-HIT guy. I've wasted enough energy arguing with one of your kind in the Muscle Failure thread. In that very same thread, I've used scientific sources to prove my arguments, and it was a waste of my time because it seems that anti-hit and stubborness go hand in hand.Originally posted by Rico S
That's not how it works. Please refrain from quoting Mr. HIT when attempting to give training advice. Squating isn't goint to make your chest and biceps any bigger. Cite one scientific study that proves this theory right. You can't because it's a bunch of garbage pseudo-science.
I'm not saying don't do them. Squats and compound exercises should be the bulk of ones training regimen.
WTF? Don't be stupid. While I am no fan of HIT myself, Arthur Jones was right on this one. Try doing an all upper body routine for six weeks, and then try a 20-rep squat cycle with one multijoint upper body assistance exercise per workout for six weeks. I will bet you money that the second workout routine will make you grow faster.Originally posted by Rico S
That's not how it works. Please refrain from quoting Mr. HIT when attempting to give training advice. Squating isn't goint to make your chest and biceps any bigger. Cite one scientific study that proves this theory right. You can't because it's a bunch of garbage pseudo-science.
I'm not saying don't do them. Squats and compound exercises should be the bulk of ones training regimen.
Just one? All right, here you go.Originally posted by MindOverMatter
Tell you what. You cite one scientific study that proves what I said wrong, and I'll debate with you, but until then, I'll assume you're full of sh!t like you assume that I am. [/B]
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
It's nice to know the body is such a simple thing. There are so many variables and you back it all up with some anecdotal evidence. Coumpound exercises cause better growth in the areas targetted by the exercises compared to isolation but it's ludacris to think that squatting is going to make your pecs grow any faster.Originally posted by MetalFortress
WTF? Don't be stupid. While I am no fan of HIT myself, Arthur Jones was right on this one. Try doing an all upper body routine for six weeks, and then try a 20-rep squat cycle with one multijoint upper body assistance exercise per workout for six weeks. I will bet you money that the second workout routine will make you grow faster.
I am enterting my second week of the exact same 20 rep squat routine that I mentioned, and I am growing like a weed; not just my legs, but my whole body (when I wore a sleeveless shirt for the first time in 2 weeks at the gym, and saw my arms as I did my front squat warmup, I couldn't believe I was looking at the same arms)
The increase in testosterone is so ****ing small that it means jack ****.Originally posted by MetalFortress
Variables? Um, you mean like how squatting is known to increase testosterone? And testosterone increases the effect of all of your workouts? You don't need studies to know that.
Yes, it's quite the common myth these days.Originally posted by Sazuki
If you do heavy compounds like squat your CNS will get more overload and release more hormones in your blood and in effect all your muscles will grow faster. Isn't that common sense these days?