Laws on DNA testing and barriers on vasectomy

[IASGame]

I've been reading more stuff on Rational Male and felt like suggesting this for a discussion.

I am a bit shocked at the hypocrisy of some doctors requiring a spouse signature to perform a vasectomy on an adult.

I don't have kids, was not inclined to have them, and am less and less inclined. But I don't think I would have considered a vasectomy in any case (opinions welcomed).

On the topic of DNA testing, I watched Gattaca a while ago, before knowing about Red Pill. Very nice movie actually, made me think about some things.

I didn't know DNA testing required mother's permission. Not too surprising I guess. This is even though in cases of divorce the husband needs to pay regardless of DNA link?
Anyway thinking about the situation made me wonder if eventually we will get clandestine DNA tests on the market, as there were and continue to be clandestine abortions.

 

[Albatross953]

I'd sue the doctor for requiring a spouse to sign. Its a breach of privacy. Would the same apply to tubes tied?

Also there has to be a jurisdiction that allows random DNA tests. The mail is your friend.

Next they will allow child support claims based on word alone.