Largest compilation of pua pics in the world

[God_of_getting_layed]

Gunwich is...disturbing at best...and so are the pulls of these "experts"

thank you, this is my very argument.

the 'looks dont matterists' dont like to hear it. :crackup:

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

bump

 

[Serialized3]

I've always said Gunwitch looks like Glen Danzig and Robert Smith's love child.

GUNWITCH... WILL... Eat your children!

David Shade looks like a fukkin alien!

 

[Mr.Positive]

GUNWITCH... WILL... Eat your children!

He does this before going sarging...it raises his testosterone levels.

Try it!

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

Ok, so what is it about them that doesn't make them PUAs? What is your definition of PUA? Just curious.

PUA = a man who pulls lots of very attractive women;

attractive women = women that have a high probability of a man thinking "damn she's fine!"

trust me, the guys on that list are not fitting that definition okay. there not PUAs, theyre salesmen selling their bizzaar and convoluted theories on how to get women which happen to be bullsh1t most of the time.

Mounds of ugly women...how many times do people have to repeat that every guy has their own taste in women. I guarantee it that if you showed pics of girls of whom you found attractive, there will be guys who will disagree and say "she's a 6 or 7 at best".

ugly women = women who have a high probability of an arbitrary man thinking "damn, shes ugly!". there, that takes care of the subjectivity you bring up.

heres an example to demonstrate: Carmen electra will have a lower probability of a man thinking "damn shes ugly" than Rosie O donnel will. Therefore, she has to be more attractive in a general sense than Rosie. So yes, we can still classify women as to how "attractive" they are despite the subjectivity and variance of men's tastes, our tastes arent totally subjectivity. Theres an element of objectivity thrown in there too.

Again, theres nothing great about pulling mounds of "ugly" women. ANYONE CAN DO THIS, ANYONE! WITHOUT SKILL TOO.