jeffthechef said:
i'm curious..what's your opinion on analyze's post..
"Just try to avoid "isolation" at the start, escalate to that later get that isolation, it just stops the flaking when they think they just going for a friendly fun time, and not so much a date"
Hmm. Well it's an interesting suggestion,and if Analyzeit has success with his method,then I think the op should go with it.
Me personally,I ALWAYS isolate. Analyzeit is right when he said that the flaking will go down if the girl just thinks it's a friendly fun time instead of a date,but to me that's a "bait and switch".
I personally don't want to have to "trick" or "deceive" a girl into being interested in me.
I don't do that. I just come straight out with it. You can click on my username and check out the last thread I made to see what I mean.
I'll ask a girl if she's married or if she belongs to anybody,and if she says no,then I just straight out tell her I WANT to see her.
And she knows I mean romantically/sexually because I just got finished asking her if she was married or not.
If the OP tries out Analyzeit's suggestion,yes,the odds of getting flaked on will go down,but your chances of getting friendzone will go up.
The reason why is because the second to introduce yourself to a girl,HER EMOTIONS start forming for you,either towards being friends,or being sexually attracted to you,and it's the way YOU APPROACH HER that decides which.
If you approach as a friend,friendly feelings start forming.
If you approach as a guy who romantically interested,then romantic feelings start to form.
If you approach her
pretending to be a friend because you're scared to be upfront about your interest,she'll develop friendly feelings because
she doesn't know your friendship is a front.
Your friendship may be fake,but the "friendly feelings" she develops because of it are REAL. So then later on,when you finally do get up the courage to tell her you want to date her,it's too late. She already sees you as a friend....
AND has the emotions of FRIENDSHIP to back it up.
To me,if letting a girl know I'm ROMANTICALLY interested in her makes her lose interest,then she was never interested to begin with.
jeffthechef said:
i never thoguht about building a foundation of fun..i usually just go to one-on-one outings straight after getting the number..and never had problems yet..although i could see how comfort level would have a thing to do with it
Well I don't agree with using "fun" as a fountain for a SEXUAL relationship.
It should be a
part of the relationship,but not it's foundation.
To me,SEXUAL ATTRACTION has to be the foundation because if a man's not attracted to a woman.or a woman to a man,then NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.
You can be nice
You can be good
You can be a decent person
You can have a cool personality
You can dress well
You can have a nice car
and on and on and on. But if the person you're with doesn't "turn you on",you'll be unhappy.
I mean the WHOLE POINT of a SEXUAL relationship is to be SEXUAL.
EVERYTHING ELSE is secondary.
jeffthechef said:
i had a friend, who had lots of numebrs..though they were usually not from approaches/by himself...he usually got them with a friendly intent..and whenever he tried to set up an outing, they would make up an excuse, or flatout flake and he was stuck waiting..
The reason he got many numbers with few results was because of
HOW he got the numbers.
He got them through deception. He made the girl's think one thing,but in his heart of hearts,he wanted something else.
He should have just been upfront from the getgo. Had he done that,the girls would have either turned him down,or would have returned his interest from the start instead of him wasting his time.
jeffthechef said:
he was a great guy..but i think comfort level had a thing to do with it..he wasn't the best conversationalist..and things would go silent/awkward..
See the part I put in
bold,about him being a "great guy"?
That DOESN'T MATTER.
It doesn't matter how "great" he is,if there's no SEXUAL attraction there,it's useless. And that's for both men
AND women.