Why "Whatever You Want" Keeps You Single

She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.

You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.

The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.

Read more...

Ive been busy this weekend.....has ANY evidence of "Muh Russians" been found yet?

"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

SeymourCake

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
363
Spread this video


Also, obligatory:

 
Last edited:

YawataNoKami

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
821
Reaction score
306
The date is on the marquee above Jones' head at the beginning of the video. It was from Monday, June 26th.
http://breaking.projectveritas.com/cnnpart2.html


O'Keefe has something up his sleeve. He *WANTS* CNN to legitimize this video by calling for the full release (hence more attention brought to this) and I suspect the full version will further dig Van Jones' grave so when CNN demands he release it..they will regret it immediately. The first thing you think when watching that is "why does O'Keefe cut off his second sentence?? He must have done a poor job of editing..lets see the whole video! WHAT IS HE TRYINTG TO MISREPRESENT OR HIDE?!?"


Pefect setup. If not, then why leave that second sentence in the video at all?


CNN is getting a$$fvcked...................
 

Trunks

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
376
Reaction score
168
The date is on the marquee above Jones' head at the beginning of the video. It was from Monday, June 26th.
http://breaking.projectveritas.com/cnnpart2.html


O'Keefe has something up his sleeve. He *WANTS* CNN to legitimize this video by calling for the full release (hence more attention brought to this) and I suspect the full version will further dig Van Jones' grave so when CNN demands he release it..they will regret it immediately. The first thing you think when watching that is "why does O'Keefe cut off his second sentence?? He must have done a poor job of editing..lets see the whole video! WHAT IS HE TRYINTG TO MISREPRESENT OR HIDE?!?"


Pefect setup. If not, then why leave that second sentence in the video at all?


CNN is getting a$$fvcked...................
To be fair, I don't see what the news is. That CNN has an anti-Trump, pro-liberal slant takes less than five minutes to figure out after reading their stuff.
 

“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

YawataNoKami

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
821
Reaction score
306
Muh russians fantasy crumbles a little more every day:

New York Times
Corrections
June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
 
Top