Isn't DayGame a lot easier if you're Chad-tier?

[SW15]

Easier isn't really the right term. Let's just say that the women will give you a fair shot. You still have to sustain proper game after that .

An above average to elite tier looks man won't get harshly rejected and also won't get immediately rejected. Solid verbal game is an asset for a higher tier looks man in daygame, even more than nightgame. In nightgame, a tall man with an athletic physique and status can have mediocre verbal game and get one night stands. Daygame requires a little bit more personality, but above average to elite looks will reduce how much personality is needed.

Matter of fact most of the daygame advice on the internet is the same : compliment first, get her into conversation, tease if she is resisting, "plow" and so on and so forth. In my experience those methods did not work. I lost my virginity and got 8 lays in a month strictly from daygame by using different methods .

The immediate compliment to start a daygame approach isn't my preferred approach. I prefer something observational and sometimes situational. I won't go direct on a compliment.

Open-Stack-Vibe-Invest-Close from the London Daygame Model

When I first got into daygame, I found Roosh's GALNUC conversational model useful. After more approaches, I could improvise more on directing the conversation from Open to Close from London Daygame.

 

[We_ArE_VeNOM]

"Direct" is not the same as "tactless".

Yeah, and these tactless tactics have me living my best life with the ladies, junior.

Brother, I don't read the stuff you post.

You aint got to listen, but I know you heard me.

And ever since you admitted to banging a literal grandmother. I'm surprised anybody else does either.

A lion doesn't concern itself with the opinions of sheep. .

Alan Roger Currie is one thing. You are something else entirely.

I've surpassed even the Great and legendary Alan Roger Currie.

 

[BPH]

Yeah, and these tactless tactics have me living my best life with the ladies, junior.

Which apparently involves banging literal senior citizens...

I've surpassed even the Great and legendary Alan Roger Currie.

Have you ever been evaluated for mental illness? The delusions of grandeur you have contrast so heavily with your reality, where I'm surprised you're able to convince yourself that you're this great.

Anyway, I don't want to derail the thread. I just wanted to clarify that your posts and "strategy" have zero influence on my dealings with women. I think the only reason you have an appeal is that it is a lazier direct method. Why learn game when you can just say "Wanna f*ck?" instead? All that's required is a little shamelessness.

 

[BaronOfHair]

Yeah, and these tactless tactics have me living my best life with the ladies, junior.



You aint got to listen, but I know you heard me.



A lion doesn't concern itself with the opinions of sheep. .



I've surpassed even the Great and legendary Alan Roger Currie.

Mirrors a recent incident on another thread https://www.sosuave.net/forum/threa...ntion-about-theory.284740/page-2#post-3170623 You and BPH be so kind as to either declare a ceasefire on this particular point, or fight it out via DM

Personal beefs such as these derail a thread, gets us astray from the topic

 

[Divorced w 3]

Mirrors a recent incident on another thread https://www.sosuave.net/forum/threa...ntion-about-theory.284740/page-2#post-3170623 You and BPH be so kind as to either declare a ceasefire on this particular point, or fight it out via DM

Personal beefs such as these derail a thread, gets us astray from the topic

I wasn’t beefing I was stating facts

 

[BaronOfHair]

I wasn’t beefing I was stating facts

Bottom line is:

When two individuals decide to scrap with one another in a public forum(be it the neighborhood pub, or a thread on a website), that detracts from the purpose of said forum I.E. Everyone else in the pub being able to unwind after a long day in peace/Keeping the thread focused on the subject of The OP

 

[Divorced w 3]

Bottom line is:

When two individuals decide to scrap with one another in a public forum(be it the neighborhood pub, or a thread on a website), that detracts from the purpose of said forum I.E. Everyone else in the pub being able to unwind after a long day in peace/Keeping the thread focused on the subject of The OP

My issue, not related to this thread, but you engaged my name, is that my responses were critical of, someone who espouses the very opposite of the topic of said thread, which my responses therefore were in direct support of. You’ll also note the blatant, and frequent attempts, of that poster, to deflect from the points I was making, immaturely and incoherently.

 

[BaronOfHair]

Obscure flick from a prior decade https://tubitv.com/movies/714210/bad-influence is, in several respects, instructive on this topic

Our leads here(Spader and Lowe)are BOTH handsome guys, with features bordering on effeminate in some respects. Spader's character initially possesses a backbone made of Jello though, whereas Lowe refuses to be intimidated by a knife-wielding barfly, very first scene we encounter him in. Not surprisingly, only one of these fellas(Lowe's character)gets any respect from other men, which in turn melts the panties off almost every woman he encounters as well

In RL, being "Chad Tier" is also more complex than your looks. There's no shortage of 9 figure-making stockbrokers who've had their SOs run off a Harley riding concert promoter, who's covered in ink, from shoulders to soles. Being fair to the eye and loaded financially will only take you so far, if you lack virility

 

[Divorced w 3]

Mirrors a recent incident on another thread https://www.sosuave.net/forum/threa...ntion-about-theory.284740/page-2#post-3170623 You and BPH be so kind as to either declare a ceasefire on this particular point, or fight it out via DM

Personal beefs such as these derail a thread, gets us astray from the topic

I am actually intrigued by this little diss session. Two of our best posters on this site, talking a little smack, in defense about the structure of their approach. A little friendly competition is good. Truly not the worst thing that could be happening, in my opinion.

 

[Clockwerk50]

My issue, not related to this thread, but you engaged my name, is that my responses were critical of, someone who espouses the very opposite of the topic of said thread, which my responses therefore were in direct support of. You’ll also note the blatant, and frequent attempts, of that poster, to deflect from the points I was making, immaturely and incoherently.

There is no need to speak indirectly and let’s call a spade a spade:

• In @holidayad_ post, I mentioned I couldn’t recall the 9-page thread. You asked why I gave my advice, and then you replied about me being “too lazy” to check the full thread. You also said she cancelled, and I said she actually rescheduled. You didn’t respond after that.
  
  
• Later, in @CornbreadFed post, instead of arguing against my post, you mocked me by asking if I was joking, attacked me personally, and brought up my post history.
  
  
• That same day, you got in the middle of an argument between @We_ArE_VeNOM and @BPH , called @Sega Genesis “Freud,” and later called me “insane” for supporting regulation. You argued against it by calling it untrustworthy using a rogue doctor example, and then you are asking for proof to “regulate” the forum.

You were in an argumentative mood and get frustrated when others don't agree with your opinions or follow your advice. Again, I doubt many people will feel safe trusting you with their private and personal information, especially how erratic, flip flopping, and bipolar your behaviour can be.

 

[Divorced w 3]

There is no need to speak indirectly and let’s call a spade a spade:

• In @holidayad_ post, I mentioned I couldn’t recall the 9-page thread. You asked why I gave my advice, and then you replied about me being “too lazy” to check the full thread. You also said she cancelled, and I said she actually rescheduled. You didn’t respond after that.
  
  
• Later, in @CornbreadFed post, instead of arguing against my post, you mocked me by asking if I was joking, attacked me personally, and brought up my post history.
  
  
• That same day, you got in the middle of an argument between @We_ArE_VeNOM and @BPH , called @Sega Genesis “Freud,” and later called me “insane” for supporting regulation. You argued against it by calling it untrustworthy using a rogue doctor example, and then you are asking for proof to “regulate” the forum.

You were in an argumentative mood and get frustrated when others don't agree with your opinions or follow your advice. Again, I doubt many people will feel safe trusting you with their private and personal information, especially how erratic, flip flopping, and bipolar your behaviour can be.

Omg more deflection. So much energy expended to not prove you speak to women whatsoever. 1600 posts how do you even do it

it does make complete sense though why you get zero ass and can’t prove anything close to the contrary

 

[Clockwerk50]

Omg more deflection. So much energy expended to not prove you speak to women whatsoever. 1600 posts how do you even do it

it does make complete sense though why you get zero ass and can’t prove anything close to the contrary

I don’t feel comfortable putting my private and personal information online. If you don’t like it feel free to move on.

 

[Divorced w 3]

I don’t feel comfortable putting my private and personal information online. If you don’t like it feel free to move on.

You are so entirely full of shyt. All you have to do is post a screen crop photo, or one single link of you talking to a woman from this website, you piker fraud.

 

[We_ArE_VeNOM]

Which apparently involves banging literal senior citizens...

It does, doesn't it?

Have you ever been evaluated for mental illness?

A man who takes women that he hasn't SMASHED yet on dates, should be evaluated for mental illness.

Do you take women on dates that you haven't smashed yet?

The delusions of grandeur you have contrast so heavily with your reality, where I'm surprised you're able to convince yourself that you're this great.

Don't be surprised. I am that great.

Anyway, I don't want to derail the thread. I just wanted to clarify that your posts and "strategy" have zero influence on my dealings with women.

I've seen otherwise.

I think the only reason you have an appeal is that it is a lazier direct method.

Think so?

Why learn game when you can just say "Wanna f*ck?" instead?

The game/strategy is the mentality behind it.

All that's required is a little shamelessness.

Taking a woman out of a date that you haven't smashed yet, is shameful.

 

[Clockwerk50]

You are so entirely full of shyt. All you have to do is post a screen crop photo, or one single link of you talking to a woman from this website, you piker fraud.

The name-calling again? Oh no, so sad!

Lol, it’s hilarious how worked up you’re getting over this. Hope you know the more you stomp your feet and look emotionally unstable the less incentive I have to prove anything to you.

 

[Divorced w 3]

The name-calling again? Oh no, so sad!

Lol, it’s hilarious how worked up you’re getting over this. Hope you know the more you stomp your feet and look emotionally unstable the less incentive I have to prove anything to you.

You came to me, not the other way around. I guess your last word yesterday wasn’t enough, you needed a second last word? I’m off to get laid have fun online

 

[Clockwerk50]

You came to me, not the other way around. I guess your last word yesterday wasn’t enough, you needed a second last word? I’m off to get laid have fun online

Cute story. Try not to get blisters on those hands

 

[SW15]

Do you take women on dates that you haven't smashed yet?

The typical man is going on dates with women that he hasn't smashed yet.

One way to avoid going on dates without smashing is to get same night sex from bar approaches. This is becoming more difficult in the 2020s with less of an approach culture at bars. A man might buy 1-2 drinks for a woman at a bar to get the same night sex from a prospect but there's no date. Some guys can get same night sex at a bar without buying the woman a drink. She had drinks at the bar before he approached.

Bar approaches are not that good for setting up traditional first dates. If a guy wants to go down the path of setting up first dates from bar approaches, it's better to do that earlier in evenings (around 5-9 PM) than later at night.

Daygame approaches often lead to traditional dates.

 

[Divorced w 3]

Cute story. Try not to get blisters on those hands

1600 posts

not a single one about your own actual experience with women

 

[Clockwerk50]

1600 posts

not a single one about your own actual experience with women

Given your obsession with this topic and with me, feel free to go through my post history and find them.