MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 12,738
- Reaction score
- 5,156
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Witness also the way pickup gurus and instructors are practically deified by their fanboy base.Mike32ct said:Yes it is a cult
I was checking out the RSD forum the other day. Apparently the "I am the prize" thing is no longer in fashion. They are now pushing the idea that you should approach as equals, and that if you get a lay, it is a win-win situation for both of you. You exchange equal value. Viewing yourself as the prize is seen as feeding the ego, which is of course against their new age type philosophies.DanelMadr said:I absolutely hate the peacocking and PRIZE stuff
Yeah, that's right.zekko said:Witness also the way pickup gurus and instructors are practically deified by their fanboy base.
I was checking out the RSD forum the other day. Apparently the "I am the prize" thing is no longer in style. They are now pushing the idea that you should approach as equals, and that if you get a lay, it is a win-win situation for both of you. You exchange equal value. Viewing yourself as the prize is seen as feeding the ego, which is of course against their new age type philosophies.
If we were dealing with real universal truths about men and women, the concepts wouldn't go in and out of style like they do.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
with a streak of sleaziness too.San Jose California said:I think it's a scam because 99% of those pickup artists are nerds.
If it's all bullshyt then why you here? it seems like all your post are to bash this site, I sense a huge negative energy from you cause your posts are rarely positive. Believe it or not there is some good stuff here you just gotta decipher that through the b.s.JT7890 said:I concluded that the entire, I mean the ENTIRE seduction, PUA, Don Juan, "this is how you get women" shyt is just utter bullshyt. Utter bullshyt.
I have said over and over, how can you make a theory on WOMEN when ALL WOMEN are NOT THE SAME? How can I make a theory on "women" in Hawaii when I've never been to Hawaii? How can a middle class white boy make a theory on "women" in Compton when he's never been to Compton?
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
I defy you to defy properly calibrated kinesthetics as not a generally highly effective technique. Just in case you have a misconception of kino, it begins imperceptible, innocuous, and light. A light brush of the hand or upper shoulder, or a light brush of the body as you walk by. You then steadily, gradually, uppe the ante of touch, if touch is reciprocated, and touch will likely be reciprocated if there is interest. This has been field tested by myself and many others, and has the backing of empirical science.JT7890 said:I concluded that the entire, I mean the ENTIRE seduction, PUA, Don Juan, "this is how you get women" shyt is just utter bullshyt. Utter bullshyt.
I have said over and over, how can you make a theory on WOMEN when ALL WOMEN are NOT THE SAME? How can I make a theory on "women" in Hawaii when I've never been to Hawaii? How can a middle class white boy make a theory on "women" in Compton when he's never been to Compton?
Yes, that's one of the points I made in another thread, you number one don't even have time to know if the girl is with her boyfriend or not to just go walking up on some chick. But the "mentality" behind it being if you don't move NOW you will look weak, I disagree. How about you enjoy the space? Enjoy the venue? To walk in a damn club and IMMEDIATELY go after gaming chicks IS what's desperate, weak, and creepy. Goodness.I don't care for the 3 second rule either. I think it can get a guy into a confrontation (ie fight) because that is NOT enough time to assess whether she is with a guy or not. But, the IDEA behind the rule is sound. Don't wait too long or you will look weak at best, creepy at worst.
I defy you to defy properly calibrated kinesthetics as not a generally highly effective technique. Just in case you have a misconception of kino, it begins imperceptible, innocuous, and light. A light brush of the hand or upper shoulder, or a light brush of the body as you walk by. You then steadily, gradually, uppe the ante of touch, if touch is reciprocated, and touch will likely be reciprocated if there is interest. This has been field tested by myself and many others, and has the backing of empirical science.
If it's all bullshyt then why you here? it seems like all your post are to bash this site, I sense a huge negative energy from you cause your posts are rarely positive. Believe it or not there is some good stuff here you just gotta decipher that through the b.s.
Seduction community, "Sosuave.com", when you say "this and that will get you WOMEN" what fvcking women are you talking about? Everytime I ask this question, no one can answer it.
I think that's where the real seduction starts, and it's what type of women are you trying to attract, where do they live, what's the culture like over there?
Kino does not creep out women when it's done properly. Women hate guys who are very touchy right off the bat, but kino begins as imperceptible. It's touch which nobody would think twice about. You could kino your grandma, mother, or sister at a birthday dinner party and they would never be wiser. It's inert. But potentially interested women will view kino as an invitation towards more touch and more obvious touch. You begin with safe areas of the body such as the hands and progressively work your way to more intimate areas and progressively work from light to heavier. Obviously, as with everything, context is important; meeting a slut at a house party will be different than the subtle nuances of a modest girl at a coffee shop.JT7890 said:I'm not against kino lol, but give me a break? If the girl isn't "feeling you" then ANY touching will come off creepy, no matter how light it is. If the girl IS feeling you, and you are NOT touching her or you are touching her all "lightly" she will wonder if you are gay or she might consider you not aggressive enough.
From my experience, once I see that the girl is "into me" I naturally just go into touching, massaging, or whatever like I would do to a girl that I'm dating. What's with the "building up" shyt? Building up to what? Either she's interested or not.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.