“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

Is prenuptial agreement necessary?

Francisco d'Anconia

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
15,481
Reaction score
65
Location
Galt's Gulch
RedPill said:
..In the above scenarios, the couples are not pair-bonded based on complimentary qualities that foster a healthy and synergistic relationship together, but rather on complimentary fears that compensate for individual weaknesses.

Would you guys agree this describes most new marriages?
This is typical of marriages across the board, new or not. People have focused on the concept of marriage instead of the compatibility necessary to create a synergistic relationship.

Good post! :up:
 

“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

Colossus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
3,494
Reaction score
542
RedPill said:
...The requisite maturity which makes her a marriage candidate in the first place would be the same maturity which allows her to understand the self-evident necessity of a pre-nuptial conversation. Res ipsa loquitur.
Awesome post, Redpill.

You explained it more succinctly than I could.

I would agree, at least intuitively, that most younger or newer marriages harbor one or more of your listed combinations. As an addendum, I would say that rural/old-school value-based marriages arent necessarily a 'matrix' union by default; I think the mitigating factor with those is age and lack of maturity.

My father was divorced by his wife of 10 years about a year and a half ago. It was difficult to see him go through the ordeal, especially at his age and given our family circumstances. She essentially left him without explaination.

Not too long ago we had a conversation where he told me that he never used to believe in prenuptual agreements, at least per se, but after his divorce he said that would never enter into another marriage without one. She didnt rob him blind, but because of the strong disfavorment of males in divorce from a legal standpoint, he still has to pay her alimony for several years. And I believe she got a portion of his pension. He has been a firefighter for almost 30 years. His pension was intended for retirement and for his kids. Makes me sick. Really. She deserves nothing. It was HIS money to begin with, and it's still HIS money, but not in the eyes of the legislature, even though it was her choice to divorce. She would not reconcile despite his efforts.

His ordeal has heavily influenced me to make a pre-marital legal agreement a non-negotiable. Like Rollo said in his older post, it's easy to think you dont 'need' one based on your current and projected net worth/assets, but God forbid the day come when you DO have considerable monies and assets and a divorce is imminent. The gavel pounds in favor of the woman, almost every single time.
 
Top