Investiment level

[jhonny9546]

The Law of Least Effort

I’ve been mentioning it for a while on here, but a friend pointed out to me recently that I have yet to actually flesh out something I’ve been referring to as the Law of Effort; henceforth referred to as the Law of Least Effort for reasons of clarity. When I say the Law of Least Effort, what I’m...

www.girlschase.com

I can see this to be true, because I see this scenario happening in real life.
1st The men is more invested into the LTR and the family? The women will leave/divorce soon or in near future. (Happened to 3 LTR of friends)
2nd The women is more invested into the LTR and the family? The women will stay and nuture the family. (Happened and happening in 5 LTR of friends)

I found out that the men in the 2nd scenario it's also better at "Giving Orders".

For ex: something that comes natural to me, it's asking someone thinking, instead of directly giving them an order.
For example, a women would ask me: "How should I do this?" , so I would reply her "How would you do it?" instead of "You do it like this".
Which is a better response?

 

[jhonny9546]

The best response is not reading that blogger's tripe.

Is that a bad source to read about?

 

[ThisIsSparta]

My wife once accused me of being content with reaching 80% perfection by investing only 20%.
She wanted to imply that i am lazy in our relationship and should "work" more to reach 100%.

I told her to reach 100% perfection i would need to invest 100% as the requirements for the last 20% rise exponentially.

Instead of reaching 100% at a certain thing by investing 100% time/energy i told her i rather invest 5 times 20% on different things in my life and reach 400% in total then just 100%.

She didnt like the explanation but couldnt find an argument against it.


Being 100% invested in a woman(making your world revolve around her) is recipe for disaster. The other way around is very beneficial for a relationship.

 

[jhonny9546]

My wife once accused me of being content with reaching 80% perfection by investing only 20%.
She wanted to imply that i am lazy in our relationship and should "work" more to reach 100%.

I told her to reach 100% perfection i would need to invest 100% as the requirements for the last 20% rise exponentially.

Instead of reaching 100% at a certain thing by investing 100% time/energy i told her i rather invest 5 times 20% on different things in my life and reach 400% in total then just 100%.

She didnt like the explanation but couldnt find an argument against it.


Being 100% invested in a woman(making your world revolve around her) is recipe for disaster. The other way around is very beneficial for a relationship.

Pareto could be a good source.
I just found out how a women can transform, for good, when you invest less.
It's like she'll become a crazy co-dependent servant and she'll also ask you to have sex

 

[jhonny9546]

A guy who aims to impress with a 10K lay count? Douchey con man.

For sure, but reading trought it, there are interesting things too

 

[jhonny9546]

I check out the person before I listen to their opinion. This douche falls short of the mark, so I don't care whatever he writes.

For example, there is this post,
https://www.girlschase.com/content/relationship-communication-olive-rule which I found interesting, but this things seems to be something that exist yet, but He pratically gave a name to this.
I've also found this to be true to the nature of it.

https://51.159.195.65/content/influence-half-life-while-away-youre-losing-influence?__cpo=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ2lybHNjaGFzZS5jb20