"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
Interesting article on Masculinity preference when choosing men
- Thread starter lakeshore
- Start date
"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,802
- Reaction score
- 10,036
I can't help but notice this only studies how guys LOOK, not how they ACT. So girls find the feminine pretty boys attractive, no surprise there. But when it comes to research like this, they're not getting the whole picture because with women, attraction is so related to BEHAVIOR, not just appearance.
It is interesting when they talk about how higher testosterone males are more likely to cheat and less likely to stick around to help raise the baby. This research centered on women in their early to mid twenties. Usually women don't figure this out until a little later in life. Maybe they're getting smarter while the men are getting dumber?
It is interesting when they talk about how higher testosterone males are more likely to cheat and less likely to stick around to help raise the baby. This research centered on women in their early to mid twenties. Usually women don't figure this out until a little later in life. Maybe they're getting smarter while the men are getting dumber?
Near the end of the article it goes on to say the females deemed attractive by most standards want it all. Looks, wealth, caring, family man, etc... (what a surprise! of course what you want and what you get are 2 different things usually!)
Another feminist article trying to put down masculinity. I just laughed when she started bleating: Women are repelled by high testosterone men, as they are seen as more aggressive, philandering, unsympathetic and domineering.
It's a ridiculous test to do as well, as there have been few control variables. Who are the people doing these questionnaires? I'm guessing most of them are fat, unattractive, unfeminine or just average women. Seriously, how many hot feminine girls do you know who fill out questionnaires and spend a lot of time on the internet. They're all too busy going out with the gals, socialising to be spending time on the computer. So it's pretty unconclusive for finding the women WE want to attract. Hell I don't care if some fat computer geek girl finds feminine men more attractive, I'm not going for her.
The author is just trying to push feminist ideas, by giving the impression of 'changing times'.
It's a ridiculous test to do as well, as there have been few control variables. Who are the people doing these questionnaires? I'm guessing most of them are fat, unattractive, unfeminine or just average women. Seriously, how many hot feminine girls do you know who fill out questionnaires and spend a lot of time on the internet. They're all too busy going out with the gals, socialising to be spending time on the computer. So it's pretty unconclusive for finding the women WE want to attract. Hell I don't care if some fat computer geek girl finds feminine men more attractive, I'm not going for her.
The author is just trying to push feminist ideas, by giving the impression of 'changing times'.
“The 22 Psychological Triggers That Make Women Chase You… Starting Tonight”
Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.
I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.
Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules. Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.
I don't see how this article is feminist. However, i do think it is prime proof on how our environment and experiences shape what we consider attractive. My theory is that in the countries that are unhealthy only the strong males survive, thus causing women to be attracted to them naturally because most of them are more powerful and on top.
Its the same how obese America is now fixated on super skinny models. Your mind develops and controls what is attractive by what is surviving and what is the most powerful.
Its the same how obese America is now fixated on super skinny models. Your mind develops and controls what is attractive by what is surviving and what is the most powerful.
CuriousGirl
Senior Don Juan
I've not read the article, but I can immediately tell you I'm more attracted to the face on the left.