I really hope Trump would score even more today

[Who Dares Win]

Not because of politics since Im not even american but cause I want the global left to get back in their place, to finally understand that they gave themselves death the same moment they pushed the turbo on mass migrations, gender, poundme2 and so on.

It's not anymore about politics, its about human rights, freedom, free speech and traditional family.

 

[user43770]

Not because of politics since Im not even american but cause I want the global left to get back in their place, to finally understand that they gave themselves death the same moment they pushed the turbo on mass migrations, gender, poundme2 and so on.

It's not anymore about politics, its about human rights, freedom, free speech and traditional family.

Trump seems to be at his best when he's backed into a corner. I can't wait to see him humiliate a Democrat House full of low IQs. Just look at how they botched the Kavanaugh hearings.

Men are waking up to the ridiculousness of Leftism. They're doing it all over the world, and I think Trump was the catalyst.

I'm excited to to see this sh1t unfold.

 

[EyeBRollin]

It's not anymore about politics, its about human rights, freedom, free speech and traditional family.

The Republican Party with their Republican appointed corporate judges ruled that it is corporations that have rights, personhood, and feee speech. Yet here you are championing human rights from an administration that cages human children. Please explain these contradictions.

 

[Who Dares Win]

The Republican Party with their Republican appointed corporate judges ruled that it is corporations that have rights, personhood, and feee speech. Yet here you are championing human rights from an administration that cages human children. Please explain these contradictions.

I believe any ideology which deny due process, rule of law and basically any other things we have in the civilized world is a threath to to freedom.

To fire a man and arrest him with no trial nor evidences just because a woman said so is basically what made middle age....middle age (except it was heretics back then) and such things are supported from international leftism and enforced any place where there is a us base.

Awfully being european does not allow me not to give a fvck about what happens in the us.

 

[user43770]

The Republican Party with their Republican appointed corporate judges ruled that it is corporations that have rights, personhood, and feee speech. Yet here you are championing human rights from an administration that cages human children. Please explain these contradictions.

Obama bailed out Wallstreet quicker than Bush did. Please explain these contradictions.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Obama bailed out Wallstreet quicker than Bush did. Please explain these contradictions.

There is no contradiction. They both serve the same masters. Anyone who thinks the dem-repub ballot offers real choices is a fvcking moron.

 

[redskinsfan92]

At the end of the day a divided Congress won't pass as many laws and will leave us alone a little bit.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Populism is what will restore human rights. That is the very definition of Populism.

Yeah, angry mobs are real into human rights protections.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Would a doctored video from infowars be evidence enough? The white house would say so. They just released one as an excuse for banning Acosta. That whole thing was a setup. Trump called on him with the intention of sicking the intern on him. It is easy to see her taking directions from off camera. Then Sanders releases the infowars fake video that same night. Right wing nutballs aren't very suave about their lying, but if their followers are dumb enough, then it doesnt matter.

 

[Mike32ct]

Populism is what will restore human rights. That is the very definition of Populism.

Populism should be a no-brainer for all except the corporations (and politicians bought by corporations). I’m not sure why it’s even controversial or considered a bad word.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Battery is unwanted touching, and it includes items in your possession as being part of you. The famous torts case about it involved a woman getting a dinner plate yanked out of her hand, which was declared by the court to be battery. That is exactly what she was doing to him by grabbing the microphone from him, with obvious direction from off camera. His actions were perfectly justifiable self defense. He didnt respond with any more force than what she was already using on him.

And he was asking questions. That is what made trump so angry. After I believe question #4, trump can be heard saying "yes you are the enemy of the people," which is the exact same line that has already made one nutball mail bombs to CNN. But trump just cant keep his mouth shut, even when his words endanger peoples lives. Now someone will mail Acosta a bomb, and trump will laugh about it.

 

[Who Dares Win]

I'd say otherwise. Most of the US, let alone Trump, doesn't much care for human rights or freedom nowadays, especially if it's those of someone they don't relate to. This matter, however, long predates Trump and the populist wave that made him possible.

The word populism means those who follow the needs of the people, nowadays its basically what gives sores to those who thinks they can rule over others just like an absolute monarchy.

No wonder the biggest enemies of "populism" in europe are those sitting in the european commission that while not elected from anyone basically decide life and death of european citizens...btw europeans keep saying no to mass migrations and islamization any time they vote yet those "men of virtues" ruling without anyones vote keep going the other way.

Populism and democracy are two brothers walking side by side, if you attack the first its because you dislike the second.

Never in recent history there has been such a fraction between the rulers and the ruled in terms of will and needs, its no coincidence the rise of "populist parties".

 

[EyeBRollin]

Evidence of the caging please?

Pleading ignorance is not a credible argument.

I do agree that corporations should have no such rights.

However neither of these take anything away from the original point which you have diverted from.

Corporate person hood is the hallmark of Donald Trump's Republican Party. Do you agree they are acting contrary to your own interest?

 

[Spaz]

Populism..

That's easy stuff. Works in every country, across races, tribes, cultures. It's always the same formula.

Ordinary people by their very nature don't want confrontation, wars, decisive politics etc..etc.

All a leader needs 2 do to get those very same ordinary people 2 do their bidding - is tell everyone that they r under attack, then go abt denouncing all those pacifists as being the enemy of the people, lacking patriotic tendencies etc..etc and with great fanfare say it's exposing ur country, people, tribes, way of live to danger !

Works every single fvcking time, the herds with their herd like mentality always end up being fearful...

Again...Easy. Works in any century.

Some of you here r warriors by trade or used to be, you guys didn't learn this simple trick ? That's a shame..I remember my training.

Limited thinking makes u part of the herd.

A predator is never part of a herd. He feeds off the herd. Remember that.

Thats one of the reasons Trump has my admiration.

 

[Spaz]

Some of you guys think that Trump is Right leaning in his ideologies.

For men like him, right or left leaning is meaningless. It's all abt him making the most profit and at his age now perhaps setting his legacy etched in stone, is his only motivation.

He walks on both sides of the ideological coin as he knows doing so makes him different, more powerful.

It's like a Demon having the ability to walk in heaven amongst the angels, smiling, preaching or an Angel doing the same in hell. God like powers huh? Makes one limitless ?

Now, I hope u boys do understand why I say u limit urself by staying firmly on one side of the ideological coin...or is ur programing making it too hard to comprehend what I'm saying all this while?

I only see @samspade walking both sides of the coin.

There's some hope yet...

 

[Spaz]

1. How do you know what Trump's motivation is
2. I am for thr most part Libertarian, so I walk both sides of the coin. It appears Right leaning to you because you have been duped by the current placement of the Overton Window.

To be neutrally placed between the two, first you have to accept that rights apply to ALL groups equally, and we are far from that with the most recent 8 years of marxist policies.

1. Trumps motivation?

Ask any shark and they'll tell you the same.Go ahead and ask. It's always abt profit to the shark.

2. Overton windows? Ideologies?

You must think a shark cares abt that..

3. Neutral between the 2 ? Rights ?

Again, you must think that a predatory male by his very nature even cares abt it in the 1st place..

It's all meaningless to him, and it's only usefulness comes from being used as a weapon to galvanise people into doing his bidding.

It's the way of those used to having power.

It's so easy for an effective leader to manipulate men when they're ideological inclined towards one path.

To damn easy at times.

One of the main reasons why women has a stranglehold over men.

 

[AttackFormation]

To be neutrally placed between the two, first you have to accept that rights apply to ALL groups equally, and we are far from that with the most recent 8 years of marxist policies.

"Marxist policies"? lol, what does that even mean?

 

[Billtx49]

"Marxist policies"? lol, what does that even mean?

1. the system of economic and political thought developed by Karl Marx, along with Friedrich Engels, especially the doctrine that the state throughout history has been a device for the exploitation of the masses by a dominant class, that class struggle has been the main agency of historical change, and that the capitalist system, containing from the first the seeds of its own decay, will inevitably, after the period of the dictatorship of the proletariat, be superseded by a socialist order and a classless society.

 

[AttackFormation]

1. the system of economic and political thought developed by Karl Marx, along with Friedrich Engels, especially the doctrine that the state throughout history has been a device for the exploitation of the masses by a dominant class, that class struggle has been the main agency of historical change, and that the capitalist system, containing from the first the seeds of its own decay, will inevitably, after the period of the dictatorship of the proletariat, be superseded by a socialist order and a classless society.

That doesn't refer to any "policies".

 

[AttackFormation]

I should say more "cultural marxism", although true marxist policies have been instituted as well.

Cultural marxism has risen in many forms. From unisex LGBT bathrooms, to the metoo/ believe women movement, to the "white privilege" accusations, to open borders, to hormonal treatment for children, and on and on and on.

These are all extreme left ideologies and the Overton window has shifted so far to the left that even the idea of a European heritage nuclear hetero family is considered "right leaning".

What do these things have to do with Marx?

I don't get where this slur of "cultural marxism" comes from.