"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"

You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.

She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.

Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.

Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.

Read more...

Hypergamy Lessons

Maximummax

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
485
Reaction score
25
Location
Florida
Just got a thought, how about we have a Hypergamy lessons in schools/universities?
this will educate guys so they won't end up getting ripped off or falling for false love :rockon:
 

"She Liked You in March. It's October Now."

Attraction runs on a clock.

She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.

The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."

One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.

Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.

Read more...

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
3,617
Age
33
Location
Sweden
This is like saying, "how about we have economy lessons in schools/universities about stuff like how money is made? this will educate people so they know the world is set up to f*ck everyone in the ass by default even before any other factors like inequality, exploitation, crime and other things come into play"
 

Stagger Lee

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
138
They need to teach it in middle school or high school.

Universities, the founding home for feminism; multiculturalism; etc, don't acknowledge hypergamy, female shallowness or any female flaws or bad behavior. Universities ARE largely responsible for creating hypergamy.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
16,794
Reaction score
10,024
AttackFormation said:
This is like saying, "how about we have economy lessons in schools/universities about stuff like how money is made? this will educate people so they know the world is set up to f*ck everyone in the ass by default even before any other factors like inequality, exploitation, crime and other things come into play"
That would be good too.
 

SgtSplacker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 18, 2011
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
504
Wonder what would happen is all this stuff went mainstream like that?
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

Boilermaker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
76
SgtSplacker said:
Wonder what would happen is all this stuff went mainstream like that?
The world would be a better place, overnight.

(1) Men would be happier.

They would feel like men, act like men, even when they don't, they would be expected to act like men, which they would adapt eventually.

They would be OK with failure and rejection but they would get a lot of support and love and inherent respect which would refuel them.

(2) Women would be happier.

They would be courted, approached more, protected more, by families, and other men who are not their partners and they would be respected too.

Of course there would be exceptional cases where women were abused or mistreated, but rejecting the whole notion of biologically inspired traditional gender roles based on exception would be to reject the idea of using cars altogether because they lead to accidents.

I firmly believe that once the 'rebound' of the sexual revolution and feminism is over, women will realize this and accept a traditional, somewhat ceremonial role with well-defined boundaries they are more naturally comfortable with. By that time MRA will have calmed down, and gender inequality will be defined as an encompassing movement which would go after those exceptions I am referring to above.

I don't have good research to back up these claims, this is my instinct.
 
Top