jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
I work in an office of 20 people, and I am very curious about the behavior of women (but also men) around a particular man (A). I will compare him with another man (B), who does not get the same "reactions", but different. I'll give some examples:
Scenario A) A woman enters a room to talk to a man about a problem. A serious problem that should be resolved because of a work deadline. The woman explains the problem with precision, and the man listening makes clumsy noises, mocks her by making little voices, and does anything but solve the problem.
The woman reacts by laughing to every line and tease, and she ends her conversation having laughed, she even seems excited, but she hasn't solved the problem. Even the womens around start to laugh at every bull**** the men says, and seems to be excited when talking to him.
Scenario B) A woman enters a room to talk to a man about a problem. A serious problem that should be resolved because of a work deadline. The woman explains the problem with precision, and the listening man makes apprehensive noises, moves his head to nod, and listens deeply, and together they work on solving the problem. The woman reacts by thanking him and ends her conversation by smiling.
She solved the problem, but she doesn't seem to be excited. Woman around are prone to talk with the men, but not seems to be excited, but just conversanting
Looks, money and status are same, Man A is a 6 and Man B is a 5.5. So they are on the same value.
The only thing that I've noticed is that B is far more intelligent than A, but A wins on social intelligence. What conclusions could you draw from this story?
Why are people, and women more prone to men A, even if he's acting like a "child"?
What is the focal point of thoose social dynamics?
Scenario A) A woman enters a room to talk to a man about a problem. A serious problem that should be resolved because of a work deadline. The woman explains the problem with precision, and the man listening makes clumsy noises, mocks her by making little voices, and does anything but solve the problem.
The woman reacts by laughing to every line and tease, and she ends her conversation having laughed, she even seems excited, but she hasn't solved the problem. Even the womens around start to laugh at every bull**** the men says, and seems to be excited when talking to him.
Scenario B) A woman enters a room to talk to a man about a problem. A serious problem that should be resolved because of a work deadline. The woman explains the problem with precision, and the listening man makes apprehensive noises, moves his head to nod, and listens deeply, and together they work on solving the problem. The woman reacts by thanking him and ends her conversation by smiling.
She solved the problem, but she doesn't seem to be excited. Woman around are prone to talk with the men, but not seems to be excited, but just conversanting
Looks, money and status are same, Man A is a 6 and Man B is a 5.5. So they are on the same value.
The only thing that I've noticed is that B is far more intelligent than A, but A wins on social intelligence. What conclusions could you draw from this story?
Why are people, and women more prone to men A, even if he's acting like a "child"?
What is the focal point of thoose social dynamics?