Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
This may come as a shock, but if you say something absurdly uniformed, and multiple parties correct you of your ignorance, it may have less to do with multiple parties being one person, and more to do with you being wrong.Burroughs said:
No you're not done at all, nor u dont care about it as you said, you're spamming all around for days after your declaration.Jaylan said:
because jaylan/uberguy is a bitter, feminist lesbian troll who can do nothing but spam thoughtful discussion and spread ignorance.Danger said:
How about you make a proper rebuttal to the counterpoints provided to you instead of going off on rants. Seems you are trying to direct attention away from your failed argument about the traditional family before. You talk about "ego driven agenda" yet look how upset you get that you need to label things as "faggotry" and go off on tangents that ignore previous points that crushed your ignorant claims about India and China. Stop dancing around whats been said. How about properly quoting and responding to the presented points.Burroughs said:
Maybe if you argued my points instead of making character attacks, then youd get somewhere. I swear some of you are so typical...whenever anyone makes a valid counterargument all you can do is sling an insult, or make some kind of accusation, all the while ignoring the main topic of discussion.Who Dares Win said:
Again, LEARN TO READ. Comic books primary market is not young kids. With that being said, how is one gay Green Lantern threatening any parents ability to decide what their kids see? Come on now.Danger said:
Are you doing some introspection about ur past posting and planning your future activity?Jaylan said:
The more I read his(?) post the more I agree with you that theres something strange.Burroughs said:
Im not spamming bro...since when is simply quoting and responding to posts spamming? How about you guys from now on actually respond to my points instead of making character attacks. Thats how intelligent debates work. One cant be taken seriously and win a debate if all one can do is throw character attacks.Who Dares Win said:
Pathetic. Because if a man dares disagree with the bitter dudes on this website, he MUST not be a man. He MUST be a troll huh :yawn: Whats with the constant crying about how gay men and "feminists" are ruining everyones lives? Jesus Christ Ive never seen so much whining and conspiracy theory. How about living your life folks and not letting insignificant crap like the OPs article bother you. No one would be complaining if they changed Green Lantern to Asian...so whos gives a **** if hes gay. They can make him a Muslim Eskimo and it wouldnt make a freaking difference in how anyone lives.
I'm not so sure of that. If Green Lantern were Asian, Danger might use that as more "proof" of racism against Whites.Jaylan said:
I didnt start off with an insult. I have many times asked you all to read my posts completely and thoroughly, because I have already addressed the kids argument. Kids arent the main target of comics...so people need to respond to that and tell me why they are concerned with comic books when most people reading comics are teens and young adults.Danger said:
Your argument fails. Children are exposed to the world in general. So should gay people not be allowed to exist as gay? Should the idea of homosexuality not exist in the adult world because kids might learn what it is? It wont make the kids gay by knowing gay people exist. You cannot completely shield kids from knowing what homosexuality is. Be real.
In what way is ONE comic book hero that most kids will never encounter, considered "in your face"?
Lol, look how emotional you are. Grow up, its getting sad.
My values is that people are people first. And should be treated as normal as everyone else regardless of skin color, religion, gender, or orientation. Thats how Im raising my kids. Im not teaching them to be intolerant of someone. And Im not gonna sit all scared like some parents hoping they never date *insert certain group*. If my kid wants to date white, asian, muslim, jew, atheist, or end up a lesbian or gay kid I wont give a damn. Ill love my kid just the same. Trying to hide them away from things wont keep them from discovering the world as they get older.
Whats to reply to you, we told you we dont want our children to be fed with any sexual content and all you come with is that comics are read for a big part from adults.Jaylan said:
Of me? Not so much. You should re-read your history, as Goebbels' views on gays were much closer to yours than mine. If you want to violate Godwin's Law, Nazis have much more in common with anti-gay bigots than with people who believe in tolerance.Danger said:
Cowardly? I'm not the one terrified of gays.Danger said:
Because its not really about the comics with you people and you know that. Its seems to be about homosexuality in general and that can be seen in all of you guys intolerant replies. Again, its ONE comic book character out of hundreds. Im sorry...but its up to YOU to parent your kids.Who Dares Win said:
Wow you are reaching here. Disney cartoons have a primary target...and thats kids. Thats entirely different from comics which target teenagers and young adults. YOU should be watching what your kids do...not getting all butt hurt because comic book writers provided gay teens and adults with someone to look up to and admire.
Again, if it was about kids being kids, then people would be complaining about the violence and sex in some comics that exist today...but they dont. They simply dislike homosexuals, and god forbid theres is any PG homosexual dating in a comic even though racy things happen with heteros in pop culture all the time and children see that without complaint from dudes here.
Wow....read the first few pages again. You have selective memory. It was (.)(.) who started with the negative crap bashing homosexuals, and then jabbing at anyone who disagreed with him. So please re read this thread.
Um, people did reply to his points, including myself...but people like you dismiss any counterarguments and start slinging insults. As soon as someone disagree with any of you, out comes the bashing and the female name calling. Grow up.
Should I call you the Waaah-mbulance?
You dont hate homosexuals? Ok...but you all call them unnatural, evil, faggots, etc. Last I checked, faggot wasnt a loving term.
You can parrott ad infinitum what you already said in different form in all the thread.Jaylan said:
Jaylan said:^Basically what he said translates to "I have no proper rebuttal to your points, so I will be dismissing them without addressing them directly. I will simply call them agenda driven propaganda and accuse you of shaming so I dont have to take the time to form a well thought out and challenging counterargument."
Ok then
No one hates freedom of choice here. Many of us actually feel those comic book writers have the freedom to choose to make characters however they want. The same way parents have the freedom to parent their own kids without expecting other peoples rights and representation to be stifled so their parenting is partly done for them.
If you read what I said about my aunt again, youll see that my problem isnt with freedom of choice...its with the promotion of intolerance or hate. My aunt doesnt agree with homosexuality, but she isnt nasty or negative about it. And because of that, I never have a reason to question her beliefs. She is tolerant of all people and never calls them out of name.
Never read so much whining from one person in my life... You've been brainwashed by the media.Jaylan said:^Basically what he said translates to "I have no proper rebuttal to your points, so I will be dismissing them without addressing them directly. I will simply call them agenda driven propaganda and accuse you of shaming so I dont have to take the time to form a well thought out and challenging counterargument."
Ok then
No one hates freedom of choice here. Many of us actually feel those comic book writers have the freedom to choose to make characters however they want. The same way parents have the freedom to parent their own kids without expecting other peoples rights and representation to be stifled so their parenting is partly done for them.
If you read what I said about my aunt again, youll see that my problem isnt with freedom of choice...its with the promotion of intolerance or hate. My aunt doesnt agree with homosexuality, but she isnt nasty or negative about it. And because of that, I never have a reason to question her beliefs. She is tolerant of all people and never calls them out of name.
Parents should be able to raise their child however they want (as long as it doesn't endanger the child). No one is questioning that. But that doesn't mean we have to agree with them, and seeing as we live a society of free speech everyone should be able to voice their opinions. That even includes the various types of mud slinging from both sides that can be seen on this thread.
All men in power have quirks and lose control. It just so happens that these ones are gay and that defines their character. They could have been Jews, or Christians or Scientologists and that could have defined them, but instead they are very very gay and people must submit to their messed up whims as payment.Burroughs said:
