I was only saying that dark-haired, darkish-skinned Mediterranean whites are sub-optimal whites, and aren't able to play Just Be White game (Nordics are optimal whites).
I agree with this.
The most in-demand White men I've seen in the mating market in the USA cities where I have lived are ones with lighter skin, somewhat lighter hair, and more Northern European ancestry.
The best thing about having Nordic ancestry in a major USA city is height. Given the current USA market where women have more abundance than ever, height is a factor that is more and more desirable. I reached my adult height in 2000 (age 17) and it is very average (5'10"). I have seen a significant difference in the way that my height has been perceived in my college and earliest post-college years (2001-2009) as compared to 2010-present.
White males who have more of a Mediterranean look (dark hair, dark-ish White skin tone) have less favorable genetic composition. There's still a market for those White males in the USA, but it is a narrower, niche look that does not play as well as compared to lighter skin Whites with Northern European/Nordic ancestry. There are enough White males with a Mediterranean who can seduce and put up solid notch counts, but it is generally going to take more effort and more of what Rollo Tomassi would call "money, muscles, and game".
I first heard this theory from Roosh he called it "Cost Per Notch" but as someone who has been tracking his CPN I find that topic a whole lot more interesting. As it gives insight on men's dating experience from the financial aspect, and not the same tired "Men are single because of women do xzy or don't do XYZ"
I've found Cost Per Notch analysis to be interesting. There are numerous approaches for analyzing Cost Per Notch.
Here's Roosh's 2nd article on Cost Per Notch from 2009. This is a really good and really simple formula for it.
Stop watching when the guy said the last girl he dated was in 2016 and the last relationship in 2010. Sorry but if you haven't dated or dealt with women in nearly a decade (excluding marriage or LTR) I really can't take him seriously.
Has he been regularly interacting with women in field since 2016? If he hasn't been actively swiping, sending DMs, or doing in-person approaches since that time, then his opinion is less valid. It's possible to not date a woman for 9 years and still be making efforts like the ones I mentioned.