Fight The Matrix: Wisdom For Guys Of All Ages!

[Joe The Homophobe]

I have compiled here a couple of my favorite quotes of wisdom from the authority on the net on heterosexuality (Henry Makow). Known for his great articles on how heterosexuality works, relationships and the corruption of society by the matrix we are living in. Notable fans of his work includes the legendary Last Man Standing (now banned from this forum). Note that some may come and slander his work for some of his other views, but is there anyone you agree 100% on everything? this is about his articles on heterosexuality and relationships not his other articles.

There is a lot of wisdom in these quotes which should help the younger members in this forum understand how life works a bit better. The only way to fight the Matrix is to educate yourself.

The Matrix: What's going on in our society when it comes to men/women

Masculinity is defined by power. Femininity is defined by love. In heterosexuality, a woman gives her husband power and a man gives his wife love. Women must give men the power to love them. Thus male power is transmuted into love and two people become one.

A woman can open a door herself, but when a man does it for her, both sexes are affirmed.

If you transfer power from men to women, as fe-manists advocate, you neuter both sexes.

You emasculate and enfeeble men. They have been feminized. Tyrants know that women can dis-empower men by challenging and competing with them.

As result of gaining power, women have become strident, aggressive and bitter. They are dependent on their employers; in short they serve the New World Order.

From the article "Women Look to Men for Leadership"

What it all comes down to

Men respond to vulnerability in a woman not power. As I have said before, heterosexual love involves the exchange of power for love. Men want power. Women want love. The female surrenders and allows the male to protect and possess her.

In return for her acquiescence, the male loves her in the full sense of the word. He is in charge but he also wants to make her happy. This is natural when someone makes you happy.

Women need to give men the power to love them. My wife's mother gave her daughter good advice: "Look for a man to take care of you but be able to take care of yourself."

PENIS EQUALS POWER

In the filmThe Crying Game(1992), director Neil Jordan captured the experience of the modern male: When the protagonist discovers his girlfriend has a penis, he runs gagging from the room and vomits.

This film notwithstanding, today's female impersonators are mostly women. By encouraging young women to be "strong and independent", feminism has outfitted them with a mental phallus. They have become men and made men redundant. Then they try to coerce men to love them as if we were their hand puppets.

In reality, a woman's power consists in being without penis, being everything a man is not. Not aggressive, forceful, dynamic, muscular and driven. Some weak men are attracted to "dynamic" women but they are really looking for themselves.

Feminine power consists of persuasion rather than force. A real woman relies on moral authority and her attraction: beauty, grace, charm, love and devotion. These women are very rare and in great demand.

Men and women are different. Jonathan Swift remarked that women love flattery but men are embarrassed by it. This is because men are active by nature and women are passive. The universe is held in balance by positive (active) and negative (passive) principles. Marriage is the way heterosexuals achieve this balance.

From the article "Why Men Are Losing Interest in Women"

What makes a real woman

Men need to distinguish between women who are feminine and those who are inverted.

A feminine woman is receptive to men. She exudes cheerfulness and inviting warmth. A man can make a friendly remark and be well received.

An inverted woman, on the other hand, is fearful and defiant in the presence of men. She has been taught that man is a competitor, or worse, a predator.

These women are out of touch with their nature and you can tell. Woman's essential nature is to be an incubator of love. Her natural role is to create an environment in which living beings thrive. Her destiny is to love a man, and through him her children. Her reward is their love and happiness.

Sexual intercourse and childbirth are manifestations of a spiritual relationship. A man must first plant his spirit in a woman's heart and find a warm reception. That spirit takes root and love grows into a sapling, and then a towering oak. Finally, a child is the expression of this unseen reality.

Members of couples who remain "independent" are in competition with each other. They cannot know true intimacy. They cannot know true love.

Powerful forces in the world use the mass media to create social trends. These forces are promoting sexual inversion in order to sabotage the nuclear family and destabilize society. They dupe women into denying their femininity and usurping the masculine role. As a result, millions of women are inverted and are missing the boat with men. Rather than creating loving environments, they are aggressive and self-seeking. They need someone to create a loving environment for them. Hence the power struggle that makes "equal" relationships a constant trial.

From the article "The Virtues of the Feminine"

Men have to stop championing b|tches and putting them on pedestals

The Official State Gender Ideology, feminism, has decreed that femininity is a "stereotype" invented by men to oppress women.

Feminism is no longer about equal opportunity for women. It is a thuggish, devious synthesis of Marxism and lesbianism used by ruling elites to undermine individuals and weaken society. It is to society what AIDS is to the body.

But men are also to blame. We have accepted the feminist lie that women should be independent and pursue careers. We have abandoned the many gentle and loving women who instinctively want to build their lives around a man. We have pursued the busy, neurotic, overachievers who guarantee us heartbreak, divorce and broken family.

By pursuing these women, we are really seeking our own lost masculinity. Many of us are happy to evade the responsibility of earning a living, and taking charge of a family. In either case we are condemning ourselves to frustration and arrested development.

For heterosexuals to find fulfillment, each sex must assume its instinctive part. The sex act is a metaphor: The man's spirit pervades the female and they become one. The male spirit must be active and the female receptive.

Many men ignore willing, feminine women who can provide Wholeness. These women cannot thrive, we cannot thrive, unless we recognize, defend and love them.

From the article "Men Must Champion Feminine Women"

Women are drawn to power

The essence of masculinity is power.

Isn't it obvious? It's what women respond to. Similarly, men are drawn to vulnerability in women. We want to protect them.

To equalize power is to eliminate sexual distinction. This doesn't mean that woman are not powerful and effective as women, but not by becoming men.

Men -- steer clear of any sexual relationship where you are not in charge.

Just as femininity should be respected, so should masculinity.

You emasculate a man when you take away his power. (The corporate elite is using feminism to do just that.)

A husband will consult his wife but eventually someone has to make a decision. A man who is ruled by his wife is less a man. He feels like a little boy with his mother.

On the other hand, when his wife accepts his leadership, he feels like a man. Women help to make men.

Similarly, a wife who follows her husband's leadership feels more like a woman. If she can't follow him, she should be married to someone else.

There is no such thing as "equality" in terms of power. (Feminist "equality" is really a ploy for female domination. For example, you don't hear feminists calling for equality at universities where women often outnumber men by 2-1 .)

Men should avoid opinionated, aggressive, demanding women. It's too late to save them. This will spare you a great deal of time, money and anguish.

The essence of femininity is for a woman to depend on the man she loves.

The intimate male-female dynamic is for woman to entrust worldly power to her husband, and for him to use it to make her happy.

Man wants power. Women want love (not power.) They ARE different.

A man wants to make the woman he loves happy . Does he consult her? How else can he please her?

She reciprocates by making him happy. The energy flows.

Woman must give man the power to love her. If she is "strong, bold and independent," as she is being taught, he becomes redundant ( i.e. the true feminist agenda.)

Woman shows she loves a man by empowering him, by surrendering and trusting. Women want to be possessed by a man's love. (They are not men.)

Of course the contract breaks down if the man doesn't keep his end of the bargain. He must be her champion, loyal and loving to the end. If this contract breaks down, the marriage is over.

A feminist tends to try to control a man, to tell him how to please her (without being asked, and as if she always knows what she really wants.) These relationships fail.

From the article "Sexism is Heterosexuality"

 

[Joe The Homophobe]

The goals and tactics of the Matrix

Gay and lesbian activists recently held a "Question Gender" week at a local university.

They put up posters promoting the notion that masculinity and femininity are merely social conventions and have no basis in biology. "You are born naked and the rest is Drag," one said, quoting drag queen RuPaul.

They want us to believe there is no difference between male and female, to ignore that males have 10 times more testosterone than females. They want us to deny the principles of yin and yang, the mainspring of the universe.

Imagine the outcry if heterosexuals challenged homosexuals in similar fashion? What if the posters read, "Homosexuality is a Developmental Disorder"? The gay events drew few students but their campaign illustrated two important points.

1. Gays and lesbian activists pretend they only want tolerance when in fact they want to seduce "straights" and change the heterosexual character of society in general. The demand for gay marriage should be viewed in this context.

2. The fact that they can insult most of the student body with impunity illustrates that Power in the university and government promotes homosexuality. Why?

The five percent of the world's population that owns 95% of the world's riches have a solution for inequality. Spread the wealth? No. Instead, reduce the number of have-nots. Eradicate poverty by eradicating the poor. From their perspective, that's you and me.

The goal is to get women to stop having children. One method is to promote homosexuality, or gender feminism, which is lesbianism. It has worked. According to population expert Ben Wattenberg, "Never before have birthrates fallen so far, so fast, so low, for so long around the world."

From the article "The Conspiracy Against Heterosexuals"

Men need to take charge

A man told me that after he has done home renovations all day, he is afraid his wife will "go ballistic" if he asks why she didn't even do the dishes.

An Australian man recently wrote to me: "For too long I have made girlfriends insecure by not telling them what I wanted because of a fear of appearing overbearing."

Men need to assert their just leadership and dump the women who don't like it. There are plenty of fish in the sea and they are biting. With patience and firmness, some feminists can be saved. The rest can be thrown back.

Generally speaking, men need to figure out what they want to do with their life. You might ask what God wants you to do. Then define the role you want your wife to play and find a woman who is eager for the part.

This is what women really want. They are attracted to a dynamic man whom they cannot control. He must have a wholesome vision where she is cherished for her contribution.

From the article "Why Men Are Losing Interest in Women"

A relationship of a man and a woman is a relationship of 2 different forces

Men define themselves by deeds; women simply are love: beauty, grace, faith and goodness. Men tend to be rational and objective; women subjective, intuitive and emotional. Distinctions like these need not constrict us. They are a theme upon which to play our own variations. For example, my wife mows the lawn; I do all the shopping and cooking. But without the theme, there is confusion and chaos.

The feminist gospel that traditional sex roles are "oppressive" is wrong. For many people, a flexible interpretation of traditional roles may be essential for happiness and fulfillment.

I extrapolated from Karl Stern's distinctions. If man is motivated by power and woman by love, heterosexual love must be an exchange of the two.

A woman surrenders her power, in trust. This is how a woman expresses her love: by trusting. In this way, women actually empower men. If a man betrays this trust, he loses his power.

In return for her power, a woman gets what she really wants: a man's power expressed as his intense, undivided love.

He includes her in his sphere of self-interest: this is how two people become one. Her happiness is his happiness. He can't hurt her without hurting himself.

Teaching women to seek masculine power prevents them from getting what they really want.

From the article "Relearning Heterosexual Love"

The way we are designed: Men (active force) + Women (passive force)

THE PASSIVE (FEMALE) PRINCIPLE

The passive principle is the earth principle. The earth receives sunshine, water and seed and produces life. A woman receives a man's love and seed and after a period of gestation, she performs the miracle of giving birth to a human being.

Carrying and nurturing the young is the essence of female psychology. The denial of this reveals the Illuminists' desire to override nature and control all human life.

Being a wife and mother is what makes a woman tick. She needs to be intensely needed and loved by her husband and children.

These roles are passive by nature. They involve a great deal of adaptation. But they also require a different sort of activity. A wife responds to her husband's needs and a mother responds to her child's.

A woman is not going to be loved permanently just for her appearance, which is transitory, or for her accomplishments. Love is not like that. We love the people who sacrifice themselves for us. That proves they love us.

Men also sacrifice by working to support their families and providing love and direction. Happiness can only be found in love, not self-seeking. Love is self-sacrifice. Human beings were designed to look after each other.

In contrast, Illuminism sees "freedom" as thumbing your nose at God and living for yourself. This is not the "truth that will make you free."

HE ACTIVE (MALE) PRINCIPLE

Women want to look up to their husbands. They tend to seek men who are older and more successful. Why? They want their husband to be like their father was (or should have been), capable, reliable, protective and nurturing.

More than anything, they are seeking emotional and physical security. They feel most secure when they feel possessed by a strong, loving man.


A man's work should be his first priority and source of self-confidence. In contrast a woman was not designed to get primary meaning from career. For her, career is secondary to being loved and needed.

Despite what feminists say, a man should never show weakness. The essence of masculinity is power. If he is weak, he loses a woman's respect. If he lacks confidence, he should gain it by setting goals and achieving them.

A man should never succumb to emotional blackmail. If a woman is withholding love or sulking, he should give her time to get over it.

From the article "In Praise of Traditional Women"

American women and men: Victims

Martha directed me to Jon Hertzog's web site nomarriage.com as an example of what she and her traditional friends are up against.

Hertzog says marriage to an American woman is a trap. Sixty per cent of US marriages end in divorce and men who don't divorce "are stuck in sexless marriages with nagging and *****ing wives, but they choose not to divorce because they are afraid of being wiped out financially."

Hertzog, a 32-year-old never-married New Yorker, believes American women have "several fundamental problems that will not go away and will only get worse."

These include inherent anti-male bias and preoccupation with "fairness" [equity]drilled into them by education and media; selfishness, ridiculously high expectations, sense of superiority and entitlement; use of sex as a weapon and reward; and general mental instability. "

Hertzog advises men to visit Asia, Eastern Europe or Latin America to discover "how ridiculously overpriced and selfish American woman are." He says men should never marry unless they want children, which cost $400,000 minimum to raise and are a bad investment. American men can get sex without marriage and should drop a woman the minute she starts hinting about commitment.

From the article "The Male Fallout from Feminism"

 

[shinko]

That's quite an incredible post. I'm def going to re read it a couple of times to take it all in. good stuff.

 

[AznPlaya]

ahaha it truly is, my goal is 2 be able to be write like this one day

 

[AznPlaya]

The goal is to get women to stop having children. One method is to promote homosexuality, or gender feminism, which is lesbianism. It has worked. According to population expert Ben Wattenberg, "Never before have birthrates fallen so far, so fast, so low, for so long around the world."
That is bs i think though, the world population is hella increasin don know wtf he talkin about..

 

[AznPlaya]

Readin dis sht makes me fucin hella furious 2 tell u the truth, i read it a couple times over and over 2 sink into my head but nways.. Just fuced up and how un-natural this world is now ya feel

 

[ThunderMaverick]

Great post Joe!

Reps four u.

 

[Rumpelstiltskin]

The Matrix is real but it doesn't reflect reality!

Makow gives great insight and knows the big picture and gives the whys and hows of our transformation from the natural order of things to the unnatural order of things - it is agenda driven and done so to break up the family and thus society. The blind and the wicked are the only ones that don't see this!

 

[MooseGod]

Kinda funny how nature works... One could almost argue that homosexuality in current times IS nature at work. Reason being, the world is becoming rapidly overpopulated and human life is held in much higher esteem than any other time throughout history. If that trend were to continue, the earth's resources would be unable to sustain the human population in possibly as little as a hundred years from now. Don't believe me? The world population in 1900 was around 1.7 billion...now it is closer to 6 billion. (Source--U.S. Census bureau.) Homosexuality may simply be nature's way of reducing the human population through passive means.

Look at wildlife conservation if that helps put it in perspective--deer hunting permits are issued to avoid overpopulation. If the deer weren't hunted, they would be more prevalent in urban areas due to being forced from their natural habitats by human development, resulting in automobile accidents and other nuisances...not to mention wildlife death by starvation.

I'm convinced that one day the world will shake us off like a bad case of fleas....maybe sooner rather than later.

Or I could just be full of ****.

 

[Joe The Homophobe]

The world population in 1900 was around 1.7 billion...now it is closer to 6 billion. (Source--U.S. Census bureau.) Homosexuality may simply be nature's way of reducing the human population through passive means.

um no it is the global elite way to control population rather than distributing the wealth. The reason the population is increasing so much is because of poverty. So while you keep on reading that more and more people are becoming millionares and billionares, for every one of those there are thousands without a good education, without a home, living in poverty. The world is unjust but that is how the controllers are. We have for example the rockefellers one of america's important rich families who not only funded the women's movement but also funded nazi eugenics in germany. The elite are not out to to make the lives of poor people better in order to reduce birthrates by doing good work.

I don't think we should turn this thread into a debate about global economics and poverty although it does have to do with the topic of this thread.

 

[MooseGod]

How does sexual preference have anything to do with the global elite? I never mentioned economic factors in my post, simply population growth.

 

[Joe The Homophobe]

How does sexual preference have anything to do with the global elite? I never mentioned economic factors in my post, simply population growth.

It has a lot to do with it. I never said anything about the trumps only rockefellers who funded the feminazi movement in the USA from the start + the homosexual agenda and funded nazi eugenics in germany (and america) and funded such monsters as mengele. I won't post any links about this google is your friend there is tons of information on this including books. This is no secret, just information of the matrix kept from mainstream.

 

[Shyyhs]

Here's a tip, don't try to link everything to the matrix. Girls find that to be homosexually nerdy.

 

[MooseGod]

...but the Nazis killed homosexuals? I don't think it's homosexuality is an agenda man, it's just people doing their own thing...just like women aren't evil and it isn't us versus them. It just is what it is. Rationalize it whatever way makes you feel comfortable.

And not to be a hater, but Shyyhs is right...the matrix analogy is growing a bit trite.

 

[Microphone Fiend]

this thread is gaaaaaaaaaaaay


...but seriously, the world is not as simple as the binary oppositions and mass generalizsations on what constitutes a man and a female other than sexual organs that LMS and his seemingly heterosexual followers echo. Society forms many of the actions we believe to be innate. Take this post with a grain of salt if you weren't already hesitant by his name.

To Joe and fellow LMS followers I would suggest that you read up on post-modernism literature to expand or move away from the archaic view you have of the ever-changing world we live in

 

[theborn_athlete]

Interesting read.

If nothing else, I now fully understand what the hell all these Matrix threads are about.

 

[Joe The Homophobe]

That's quite an incredible post. I'm def going to re read it a couple of times to take it all in. good stuff.

definitely, check out Makow's work on relationships as well. Lots of wisdom there.

 

[Rumpelstiltskin]

Kinda funny how nature works... One could almost argue that homosexuality in current times IS nature at work.

this thread is gaaaaaaaaaaaay.

Here's a tip, don't try to link everything to the matrix. Girls find that to be homosexually nerdy.

Joe, don't throw pearls at swine! Only the wicked and ignorant reject truth!



...

 

[Gubby]

BAM! My ego takes another hit.

No matter how wise I make myself, someone's got there before me.

I'm starting to feel that this ego is a bit of a dead weight. Ah, but I figure it's all balance isn't it?

Awesome post. This guy knows things.

 

[Gubby]

Joe, don't throw pearls at swine! Only the wicked and ignorant reject truth!



...

There's truth in everything isn't there? It's fun, I realise that a good way is just to agree with everything while doing what's right.

Everything IS true, but that's not necessarily what you WANT.