Senior Don Juan
- May 22, 2002
- Reaction score
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
Well perhaps the reason their personal happiness is dependent on what happens in Washington is because issues like the right to vote and the right to have an abortion are decided in Washinton.Originally posted by Pook...
I have dated several feminists. I do not like them because their personal happiness is dependent on what happens in Washingotn.
Every movement has an opposition. The more women become feminist, the more women become anti-feminists. The same can be applied to the NRA/gun-control, religion/atheism, etc.Another question for you: Why is it that more and more women are anti-feminists? If you think I am bad on feminism, you should look up Wyldfire's posts.
Here is the quote from your original article:
and your new one:A feminist stands. (Note: she is fat and ugly with a poisonous personality as most feminists are.)
I have gone out with feminists. The reason why I did was because they were pretty and I was surprised to see this feminism in them.
First you claim feminism is responsible for fat chicks. Then you claim all the feminists you went out were pretty. So are the Feminists ugly or pretty?
A woman asking me out is a sign of disinterest? So if a woman asks me out, it is not because she likes me, it is because she doesn't like me? I've been asked out by a couple of women, and I have been having sex with one of them for over four months now. Is she still disinterested?A woman who just gives you her phone number, or asks you out, all without YOU doing anything is a sign of non-interest. The guy is likely to be abused in some way (example: she could be trying to get her ex jealous, etc.). (or she could be a feminist, which is reason enough not to date her)
The feminists you went out with are fakes. If she loses her feminism when she loses her singleness, she is a hypocrite, not a feminist.In fact, one time I was asked out was a feminist asking me out. But as I put her under the spell of Pook, she reverted straight back to her girlish ways. She was feminist because she was single. Once she lost the singleness, she lost the feminism.
Which human dynamics are you talking about again? Men acting as women? That is the men's fault, not feminism's. Women acting as men? If you don't like the way a woman acts, leave her. As for me - asking me out, paying for herself, watching porn with me - all this is human dynamics I support.All feminists are not different. Feminists are in denial about human nature. They believe human dynamics can be transformed through the legislative palace. They are wrong BIG TIME.
Another hypocrite. You are making your opinions and judgements based on women who are not feminists but fakes.Again, that one feminist I dated started paying her way but NATURE TAKES OVER. She started acting as she should, like a female. She paid for what she could, but she gladly let me 'date' her. Why? Because she felt feminine in doing this.
Independent women don't have to be feminist, but feminists have to be independent. Perhaps those independent women which existed before the dawn of time decided to form a movement called feminism?Feminism and a woman being independent are completely different. Independent women existed since the dawn of time. Feminism is just bad use of free-time.
Again, the feminists that I dated BOUGHT their own porn. I asked to watch HER porn with her once I found out she had porn. Obviously, not all feminists think porn is out to degrade women. This is why I keep repeating that all feminists are different.Usually, the women that watch porn enjoy doing so pretty much only with the guy sitting beside her. "Why is that, Pook?" For the same reason why girls will go to events with you that they don't even care about. They think it is cute seeing the reaction in you. When you are happy, they get happy. They enjoy that.
The feminism is declaring war on feminity? By letting women do whatever they want? Is that not the essence of freedom and democracy? Why shouldn't women have the freedom of doing whatever they want? Don't you desire the freedom to do what you want?I said: "Feminism is not declaring war on masculinity but on femininity! Feminism is a political Tower of Babylon to escape the truth of Human Nature." I even put that in bold yet you missed it.
The flaw of feminism is thinking that femininity and dependency are one of the same. They are not. A woman can be feminine and independent. My own mother was so fierce that she got the attention of congressmen. Yet, she had more power in her femininity of her grace and motherliness.
Can you please give examples of the femininity you so desperately crave? I can't find any in your post and thefore not sure what you mean.
I blame feminism on nothing to do with men's problems. I blame feminism on warring on feminity. I am sick and tired of fat chicks. It only seems to be in America and Britain. Go to Spain or Japan and the chicks are not fat. The living standards are the same. The only difference it seems is that those two countries are much more feminist oriented.
Finally. The whole reason this article was written - fat chicks. I agree that America has way too many fat chicks. I haven't seen many in Britain, but I will take your word for it. Anyway I assume your theory is that feminism is a directly linked to fat chicks.
Do you honestly believe feminism causes women to be fat or encourages them to stay fat? It can't possibly be the fast food industry, popularity of television, genetics, eating disorders, childhood abuses and stress. And the majority of the obese are men. Are the fat dudes feminists too?
I have enjoyed and agreed with all of your posts except 2, this and another one. I neither wrote the book "Refusing to be Man" nor am I a feminist. But I appreciate the sarcasm. In your original post, you blame feminism for the lack of manhood quite a few times:Practically everything I've written on this forum has always focusing on YOURSELF and dealing with YOURSELF. The blame for the lack of manhood I've always said is the issue of males not wearing the crown of masculinity their sex is heir to.
But I write one article on feminism and you blow up. You complain that I have 'feminism' wrong, then you misrepresent what I said.
BTW, you didn't write a book called, "Refusing to be Man" did you? Just wondering...
Let us continue..."Feminism is essentially about DESEXUALIZATION. This is where Nice Guys, AFCs, come from.
Those who take feminism seriously will be condemned to bitterness, ugliness, and joylessness. Any males who listen will be condemned to loneliness, stuffed with Nice Guyius Patheticus.
If you believe in any of these things, even just a little, you have been affected by Modern Feminism. It is the virus that creates the effects known as Nice Guyius Patheticus!
I'm not as big on politics as you think and I don't have any feminist pals, I just dated feminists in the past. Never heard of Rousseau before either. All I ask is that you stop looking for a scape goat for AFCs or fat chicks, they are responible for their own actions.The reason why you agree with feminism is because it shares your politics. You live in a political bubble, looking at life in view of politics.
I was like that once. Then I grew up. Life does not revolve around Washington.
This is why I condemn feminism. I bet all your feminist pals will agree with Rousseau (which is why I quoted him). The idea that human nature can be changed through legislative fiat is the most destructive, murderous, and evil things ever to come into this world. I place the horrors of the twentieth century on this concept. I do not view Humans as Vausseven viewed his automaton. I do not view Humanity as some organic garden. Where a garderner has his knives, spikes, and clippers to reshape the garden, so too do these Rousseau followers (most politicians) have laws, taxations, and regulations to reshape Humanity.
Pook, if you were free and happy you wouldn't be posting anti-feminists posts. It seems you are anti-feminist because of past actions of women you dated who claimed to be feminist. You seem just as bitter as the feminists you describe. I admire the rest of your posts but this one made very little sense to me. Perhaps because the feminists we went out with were different, the point I've been trying to make for some time now.The idea and its fruit are abhorrent. Feminism is not new or progressive, it is litereally ten centuries behind the times. It belongs in the Old World thought. Just as one thought Humanity would be remorphed by a King or grand dictator, so do these feminists believe it will be so by the legislative palace. There is nothing new in feminism.
For all you politically charged individuals: Realize that the most important aspect of being free and happy is not to let anything let you feel unfree or unhappy.