MascaraSnake
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2007
- Messages
- 230
- Reaction score
- 2
“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”
You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.
I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.
Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.
These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.
Feminazis and their lapdogs coined a new phrase - the "girlfriendzone". Thoughts?
- Thread starter MascaraSnake
- Start date
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
We need a word for chicks who write articles like that. Any ideas for a single word that covers "stupid vaccuous delusional b1tch?" Also need to work "one who employs shaming tactics in there too but "b1tch" probably covers that.
What's funny in that article, and very telling, is it nails in one short paragraph precisely why the friend zone is a problem for men and why women hate that we hate it. It's a problem for us because it completely shuts down any hope we have with a particular woman once she puts us in the friend zone. And they hate that we hate it because it essentialy illustrates the reality that to the vast majority of men, the vast majority of women are only as useful as their vaginas. In a fantasy land where women can do no wrong, are the best and brightest in all areas and can do, indeed deserve, EVERYTHING, an idea counter to that must be rooted out and destroyed. Like all things that run counter to the feminist agenda.
The author does deserve credit for pointing out one thing we probably all agree on....The pathetic stupidity of guys who find themselves in the friend zone and think they are going to get out. LOL
This article and the term it is ostensibly about are female inventions designed to shame those who acknowledge the existence of the friend zone, those who use the term, or react to it. It's not chick logic, per se, but rather pure propoganda designed to SHAME people into submitting to their bull$hit. Although this may seem logical to some of the stupid ones. This is textbook female manipulation.
What IS chick logic is the idea that the "friend zone," as a concept, is illegitimate because "atraction is fickle" and "women don't owe men sex" while, somehow, simultaneously the idea that a man is obligated to be friends with a woman that rejected him is. I don't know of much less know personally ANY guy, with an IQ above that of reptiles at least, who thinks that women owe them sex. And attraction, among men, really isn't all that fickle. But it is among women. But where did we arrive at this notion that men are required to be friends with anyone they don't want to be? Are women?
The hypocracy of the entire argument is nothing short of astounding. Most especially when you consider the reactions of most women when they get friend zones. Ever friend zoned a woman who was into you? I have. Some of them get very pissed off and won't have anything to do with you afterwards. According to the feminists that's against the rules, no? Others act like and get treated like victims. Shocker. Figure that out. You aren't attracted to her and this, somehow, means she's a victim. I'm friends with a woman who I've known, for years, wants to date me and I treat her solely as a friend. I have had all manner of women and white knights tell me that she likes me....in a tone that a parent would tell a 5 year old child they are being rude. Because we men are, apparently, obligated to date and fvck women we aren't attracted to because they are into us. According to the feminists, isn't that against the rules?
And THEY b1tch about double standards. I disagree with the poster above that says this article is pointless. It is TEXTBOOK bull$hit feminist shaming tactics proffering TEXTBOOK bull$hit feminist hypocracy....the very definition of the term double standard. Here it is, gentlemen. Clearly demonstrated for all to see. As always, the article is clear: Men who don't defer to female judgement and willingly submit to female manipulation are WRONG, indeed EVIL, and need to be shamed by women and "society" with a brand new shiny term invented for the purpose.
I'm not sure what's more hilarious about it. The argument they present, itself, or the fact that women, with a straight face, believe it.
What's funny in that article, and very telling, is it nails in one short paragraph precisely why the friend zone is a problem for men and why women hate that we hate it. It's a problem for us because it completely shuts down any hope we have with a particular woman once she puts us in the friend zone. And they hate that we hate it because it essentialy illustrates the reality that to the vast majority of men, the vast majority of women are only as useful as their vaginas. In a fantasy land where women can do no wrong, are the best and brightest in all areas and can do, indeed deserve, EVERYTHING, an idea counter to that must be rooted out and destroyed. Like all things that run counter to the feminist agenda.
The author does deserve credit for pointing out one thing we probably all agree on....The pathetic stupidity of guys who find themselves in the friend zone and think they are going to get out. LOL
This article and the term it is ostensibly about are female inventions designed to shame those who acknowledge the existence of the friend zone, those who use the term, or react to it. It's not chick logic, per se, but rather pure propoganda designed to SHAME people into submitting to their bull$hit. Although this may seem logical to some of the stupid ones. This is textbook female manipulation.
What IS chick logic is the idea that the "friend zone," as a concept, is illegitimate because "atraction is fickle" and "women don't owe men sex" while, somehow, simultaneously the idea that a man is obligated to be friends with a woman that rejected him is. I don't know of much less know personally ANY guy, with an IQ above that of reptiles at least, who thinks that women owe them sex. And attraction, among men, really isn't all that fickle. But it is among women. But where did we arrive at this notion that men are required to be friends with anyone they don't want to be? Are women?
The hypocracy of the entire argument is nothing short of astounding. Most especially when you consider the reactions of most women when they get friend zones. Ever friend zoned a woman who was into you? I have. Some of them get very pissed off and won't have anything to do with you afterwards. According to the feminists that's against the rules, no? Others act like and get treated like victims. Shocker. Figure that out. You aren't attracted to her and this, somehow, means she's a victim. I'm friends with a woman who I've known, for years, wants to date me and I treat her solely as a friend. I have had all manner of women and white knights tell me that she likes me....in a tone that a parent would tell a 5 year old child they are being rude. Because we men are, apparently, obligated to date and fvck women we aren't attracted to because they are into us. According to the feminists, isn't that against the rules?
And THEY b1tch about double standards. I disagree with the poster above that says this article is pointless. It is TEXTBOOK bull$hit feminist shaming tactics proffering TEXTBOOK bull$hit feminist hypocracy....the very definition of the term double standard. Here it is, gentlemen. Clearly demonstrated for all to see. As always, the article is clear: Men who don't defer to female judgement and willingly submit to female manipulation are WRONG, indeed EVIL, and need to be shamed by women and "society" with a brand new shiny term invented for the purpose.
I'm not sure what's more hilarious about it. The argument they present, itself, or the fact that women, with a straight face, believe it.