For example, it would be truly interesting to know how, through what signals and elements, we can recognize the context,whether "pragmatic" or "social", we live in, depending on our acquaintances, social circles, culture, and the city we live in.
If you think of a countryside with a backward culture or a city with a very modern culture, the distinction may be very clear. But if you live in the suburbs or are part of mixed social circles, it's also possible that you're not entirely clear whether you're hanging out with, and therefore, self-influencing, "pragmatic" or "social" people, or rather, toxic/dramatic/strong relationships or healthy/boring relationships.
I believe we've all lived unaware for a while and then woke up and realized what was really happening, and therefore, understanding the context in which we were living is crucial.
You might find a woman with a long history of "pragmatic" relationships, but she wants a "companionship" relationship, and then you know something's wrong. (She usually resists her grandfather and father.)
As a man, I think the "companionship" relationship is the most priceless of all, even though for many years, since the Stone Age, men have lived for pragmatic relationships.
Let's say that if you manage to be a pragmatic man yourself, and therefore have the basic elements offered by the pragmatic relationship, but on a spiritual and cultural level you adopt the system of the companionship relationship, life has a lot to offer you.
I don't think the average sosuave member wanders around villages, countrysides, and small towns in search of a woman to keep in a patriarchal way.
However, from what we understand, in addition to experienced seducers, there are those who also seek long-term relationships among us.