"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

Do you think female hypergamy is the root cause of all social ills?

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
12,749
Reaction score
5,163
I was reading an interesting op-ed about the permanence of the lower class, and it got me thinking ...

www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/opinion/david-brooks-the-cost-of-relativism.html

In the specific examples given here, it seems that the initial cause of the problems was because a woman had sex before marriage, got knocked up, and of course became unmarriageable to virtually any self-respecting man (cases where she is hot being those cases where such a man would put up with his beta-tude in exchange for high-quality sex), or in which the woman left the man (or drove him out), as legally married or common-law.

It seems to me that this all stems from the victory, in the lower class, of hypergamy over proper societal norms of living - something that is not seen as much in the non-lower classes as such folks have the psychological constraint to not give in to hypergamy at the expense of those societal norms. Now with that said, the destruction of the economic prospects for folks in that class is certainly an adjunct, as a man who knocked up his girlfriend would be considered as "unmarriageable" if his job were not deemed sufficient - which in and of itself is yet another expression of hypergamy.

The author attributes all this to "nonjudgmentalism", which really is another way of saying "the breaching of the constraint against female hypergamy, via the societal disposal of shaming the behavior of female hypergamy". The author also mentions the dearth of religion as a cause, but really all religion does in the lower class is give that psychological constraint, not from self-awareness that such constraint is necessary, but as a top-down directive to be followed, typically via fear of a wrathful God.
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

sharkbeat

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
640
Reaction score
94
Location
Southern California
I don't think female hypergamy is the root, but "nonjudgmentalism" as the article pointed out.

Nonjudgmentalism isn't just about female sexuality. In order for a society to move toward somewhere, there has to be a direction that lead them there. Religions and morality have been that guide, but the Western society have been starting to drop them in favor of nonjudgmentalism. Same-sex marriage? Sure. Female hypergamy? Sure. Do whatever you want? Sure. Worship satan? Sure. Worship science? Sure. Worship God? Sure. So female hypergamy is accepted here is because of nonjudgmentalism.

Religion is no longer a thing that a country enforces. Nationalism and patriotism is no longer a thing. We are living in a very hypocrite society. People demand respect, but they disrespect other people in the name of freedom of expression. Don't like the muslims? Why not run a Mohammad cartoon competition and claim it's a basic human rights of freedom of expression? If it's a freedom of expression, why does insulting the gays considered hate speech but not free speech?

I am not advocating for nonjudgmentalism or otherwise, nor defending any particular group, but modern society is going in all kinds of direction now. So like a dough that's been stretched out, expect lower and thinner morality as time progresses, and holes will form when it's been stretched out too thin until it eventually breaks apart.

The best we can do is to create our own filters and moral code, and stood our ground. PUAs, MGOTW, and the manosphere have been considered 'cult' by some people outside of the community. The people are free to form whatever opinion they want about us, and by the virtue of nonjudgmentalism, we are also free to form our own opinions and lifestyle.
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,772
Reaction score
4,875
Location
象外
There is no one root cause of all social ills. There are certainly a lot of indicators, (lack of religion, single parent households, drugs, crime, etc).

However, I don't believe female hypergamy is a cause NOR an indicator of social collapse.

Hypergamy has been around pretty much since humans started talking. (it's certainly NOT the boogeyman sosuavers think it is)

In fact, in feudal times, poor serf families that had a "cute" daughter often saw her as a potential ticket OUT of poverty, if they could get her married to some prince or other noble.

(Interesting read on the subject: The Red Queen)

ALL HUMANS are pretty much hard wired to get away with as much as they can get away with. Girls have ALWAYS been hard wired to marry "up" as high as they could while guys are hard wired to bone "down" as young as they could.

As far as people being stuck in lower class (as described in the linked article), look to government intervention as the "root cause."

Every time the gov gets involved, upward mobility suffers.

That, however, is a whole nother topic.
 

synergy1

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
1,984
Reaction score
192
Overpopulation is the root cause to all of our problems. When there isn't enough to go around, people will take whats theirs by force.
 

G_Govan

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
470
Reaction score
66
I think prosperity and modernity are the root of our social ills.

It's never been about a particular gender. We've lived most of our lives as a species in harsh environments under constant pressure to find ways to survive/thrive.

Things have changed dramatically in a relatively short period of time and what we're experiencing now in the first world is that huge vacuum we created being filled.

Technology has displaced men and our traditional roles much more than women. It's still a man's world but that applies to the few. As a whole, particularly in developed countries, it's all about the women.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Top