Do women who keep their rape-baby secretly like the fact they got raped?

[MatureDJ]

I've been reading articles emanating from the US Senatorial candidate in Missouri who said that women who are really raped can control their pregnancy. (NOTE: There is actually some scientific evidence that women who gestate a fetus from unfamiliar sperm have a slightly higher incidence of spontaneous abortion: http://www.jessebering.com/post/27725276755/darwins-morning-after-pill-how-couples-who-want)

Anyway, I came across this posting from a woman who got raped and kept the child.

http://www.xojane.com/it-happened-to-me/dear-representative-todd-akin-i-got-pregnant-from-rape

I get the feeling that this woman had been a classic stuck up woman who was too good for most men (but of course would have no problem hypergamily accepting Superman), but secretly wished on some level that some man would be bold enough to impregnate her. I suppose that a rapist is about as bad a bad boy could be, and it does settle her family situation that her stuckupness was priming to pass her by. And I think that most women who also do this end up quite content that their man manned up in the most harrowing way possible (possibly spending life in prison) just to get their poontang.

 

[Boilermaker]

I don't even believe her story until I see the other side's story.

Under what conditions was she raped? Was it an ex-boyfriend? Was it a date-rape? Why would he seek custody of the baby if he was a random rapist?

She does look like a stuckup b!tch from that photo, but I can't tell.

 

[penkitten]

how absurd. the victim would have to be as crazy as the rapist for that.

 

[Burroughs]

never trust a biatch named 'shauna'

this smacks of a left wing political think tank planted story.

 

[Warrior74]

never trust a biatch named 'shauna'

:crackup:

 

[iqqi]

I don't understand how people are judging this chick so harshly for her story?

Rape is very brutal and damaging, and she was only 21 years old when it happened. I got the impression that it wasn't an acquaintance who did it, but either way when someone stronger than you forces themselves on you, it's nothing short of traumatic. She seems to me to be a strong individual.

 

[FairShake]

MatureDJ you are treading dangerously close to sh!thead territory with a question like that.

Just a friendly reminder...I hope you don't talk like this in real life.

 

[FairShake]

He is just asking a question.

The title is a question. His post is his opinion. And it sucks.

 

[Bible_Belt]

I know a rape-baby. I live in a red state area with a lot of opposition to abortion. There is always a church lady who will raise a child in order to prevent one from happening. A family friend and former boss of mine did just that.

Rape-baby is a bankruptcy attorney now. He is intensely smart in a bookish and academic way. He got a master's before law school and an LLM after it. But emotionally, it's like he has asbergers's; his emotional intelligence is extremely low. He's probably a 40 y/o virgin. I don't know if that has anything to do with being a rape-baby or not.

Rape is obviously an awful thing that I don't wish on any woman. But at the same time, it is still true that a lot of women have a rape fantasy. It's probably the most common female sex fantasy. Of course, the rapist is typically some sort of romance novel character who then falls in love with her, or some other fantasy bs, but there is still a rape.

Most sex in the animal world is rape, and I doubt that humans evolved any differently. Millions of years of biological evolution often does not reconcile with a few decades of political evolution, and I think this is one of those cases. That would explain the female rape fantasy.

 

[MatureDJ]

... it is still true that a lot of women have a rape fantasy. It's probably the most common female sex fantasy ...

This is my point. I think that just about any woman who doesn't have a serious rape fantasy would just abort the baby - unless she were very pro-life, in which case she would give the baby up for adoption - as she would find the usurpation of her right to choose her sperm donor as something she would not want to accept as part of her family.

So, women who do keep the rape baby are basically those who do have the rape fantasy, or at least are relieved that they don't have to go through all the machinations of selecting a good man to mate with. In some way, a rape harkens back to the "good 'ole days" when a woman's husband was determined by her father, thereby relieving the maiden from having to choose - i.e., the choice was made for her. In this case, the rapist "manned up", and made the choice for her - and at great risk to him (i.e., long prison sentence.)

 

[MatureDJ]

MatureDJ you are treading dangerously close to sh!thead territory with a question like that.

Well, the one thing I've learned here is that jerks get poontang, while "good guys" get friendzoned. It seems to me that rape is the most jerk that a man could possibly be, which is why I think there are a lot of women that on some level are turned on by it (hence the rape fantasy.) Now, I would never do this, as the threat of jail is an extraordinarily effective deterrent to me. But perhaps, it would make me push the envelope with a woman I'm on date with who says no, as I suspect that she could respect me more for doing so.

 

[( . )( . )]

I don't understand how people are judging this chick so harshly for her story?

Call it 30 or 40 years of false rape accusations with next to no repercussions for the accuser and every 2nd attention craving chick having her very own "rape" story because it's the new black and victims are unique and edgy.

MatureDJ you are treading dangerously close to sh!thead territory with a question like that.

Just a friendly reminder...I hope you don't talk like this in real life.

Oh phuck off with that knee jerk faux obligatory shock sh!t, there are no chicks here and his question is hardly a questionable one in regards to men + men topics.

Keep that "disclaimer" bollocks for mixed gender water cooler banter eh?

 

[Warrior74]

Well, obviously if it was legitimate rape, she wouldn't have had a baby, her body would naturally reject it. So I'm going to have to say yes of course she's obviously pleased.

Of course this entire post could possibly be sarcasm on my part.

 

[iqqi]

Well unless you are a woman with a rape fantasy, then you really don't know what you are talking about when you talk about their rape fantasies. Most "rape fantasies" don't resemble real life rape in any kind of way. That's why it is a fantasy.

 

[FairShake]

But perhaps, it would make me push the envelope with a woman I'm on date with who says no, as I suspect that she could respect me more for doing so.

You are taking the "chicks dig jerks" idea and stretching it to the furthest realms of ridiculousness. Women do not respect their rapists as "bad boy alphas." Not even the women with rape fantasies. Further the majority of rapists are not bad boy alphas with a harem awaiting their rapings but usually pathetic losers who want to control another person for a few minutes because they have long since lost any control over their own lives.

Oh phuck off with that knee jerk faux obligatory shock sh!t, there are no chicks here and his question is hardly a questionable one in regards to men + men topics.

Keep that "disclaimer" bollocks for mixed gender water cooler banter eh?

It's a completely questionable one. Maybe it's idiocy is the only thing unquestionable.

The reason I mention bringing it up in public however is that I do get the impression here that some guys do not know what they can and cannot talk about it public. Some guys here seem a little off, like thinking that women desire their rapists for example, and a little extra caution could go a long way.

 

[Warrior74]

Anybody else find the term "rape-baby" to just be weird as fvck? It could be the jack daniels talking but I hope to god I never hear anyone say that word out loud (unless it was louis ck). What a weird and crappy word.

 

[( . )( . )]

It's a completely questionable one. Maybe it's idiocy is the only thing unquestionable.

The reason I mention bringing it up in public however is that I do get the impression here that some guys do not know what they can and cannot talk about it public. Some guys here seem a little off, like thinking that women desire their rapists for example, and a little extra caution could go a long way.

I'm sure at 46 he's got a fair idea of what he can and can't talk about for fear of being not "PC" enough.

Nevermind him being bomabarded with it 24/7 courtesy of femcunts, whiteknights, faggots, the media and our marxist government. Just as well he has you covering the manosphere.

I still fail to see how the topic of whether some random SWPL may or may not have enjoyed being forcefully banged is borderline "taboo" in a supposed red pill aware mens forum.

 

[MatureDJ]

Women do not respect their rapists as "bad boy alphas." Not even the women with rape fantasies.

Which is why they don't fantasize about them in the first place ...

Further the majority of rapists are not bad boy alphas with a harem awaiting their rapings but usually pathetic losers who want to control another person for a few minutes because they have long since lost any control over their own lives.

I think that except for true sociopaths, rape is simply the expression of emotion of being totally and completely sexually frustrated, and feeling that the world owes you good poontang. And evolutionary speaking, for a man who cannot get a suitable mate the regular way, rape does serve the purpose of passing on the Y chromosome - as well as to change the tribal blood in (i.e., Genghis Khan's marauder's sacking a village, killing all the men, and raping all the women - something that was scene as recently as the Bosnian war.)

Men are instinctively programmed to get access to females - with some going to extreme lengths to procure it if it's not being gotten. Rape is one such mechanism. Another is believing that being a jihad martyr will get you 72 virgins in paradise.

 

[iqqi]

I'm not a woman with a rape fantasy, but I've always presumed the thrill is because there is the conceit of danger without any true danger. This is similar to riding a roller coaster - we don't want to plummet to our deaths but we want to experience the rush of plummeting to our deaths.

It's not true that you can't know what lies beneath someone else's fantasy; everything is knowable even if we cannot experience it the same way.

There may be outliers who truly want to be raped, but I'm sure they are in the extreme minority.

As for keeping a baby that's the result of rape, any reasons offered up will be filtered through rationalizations. Remember the operating system runs the software, not the other way around. Who knows what kind of survival calculations have been programmed into us before morals can be applied.

Nothing should be taboo or closed to debate.

Most rape fantasies are not about danger so much as they are about submission. I'd say their basis lies within the sexual repression that many women (and men) experienced growing up or in church.

It doesn't mean that a woman really wants to be forcefully raped by a stranger or even an un-stranger.

I think a pregnancy becomes a whole other ball game, and the outcome is mostly dependent upon a woman's views on abortion and adoption.

 

[Boilermaker]

Most rape fantasies are not about danger so much as they are about submission.
I'd say their basis lies within the sexual repression that many women (and men) experienced growing up or in church.

Is that your professional opinion?


sexual repression due to growing up in church leading to rape fantasies............ :woo:


Profound analysis. Post of your career. Your cravings only apply to you sugar. "Most rape fantasies" don't start and end with you. I'd say you are sweet to admit you like to be dominated every now and then though.