Did Elizabeth Warren just take a jab at incels?

[Bokanovsky]

What do those all have in common?

They functioned well and led to unprecedented prosperity, until suffrage was extended to too many unqualified voters, which was the beginning of the end.

 

[EyeBRollin]

They functioned well and led to unprecedented prosperity, until suffrage was extended to too many unqualified voters, which was the beginning of the end.

That's what we call revisionist history. Try again.

 

[EyeBRollin]

According to the definition of gini, a lower coefficient means more income equality (more socialist).

I have not made any inference that moving in either direction from it's current state is better or worse for the US.

This is another lie. You commented that socialism is bad, and that lower gini coefficient is "more socialist." Therefore, higher gini coefficient would be less socialist. Yet you refused to endorse less socialism. Why?

 

[samspade]

Democracy without some degree of socialism doesn't exist. Unless you're willing to provide an example country?

He is correct. All governments take and redistribute by their very nature. They do not produce.

They are all Group Traps, and most of you to varying degrees have surrendered one freedom or another to yours.

 

[Bokanovsky]

He is correct. All governments take and redistribute by their very nature. They do not produce.

All I governments take, I agree with that. However, there is a difference between a) taking money to spend on things that we all need and benefit from, like national defense, law enforcement and infrastructure and b) giving money to those who refuse to work. The latter is socialism; the former is not.

 

[AttackFormation]

All I governments take, I agree with that. However, there is a difference between a) taking money to spend on things that we all need and benefit from, like national defense, law enforcement and infrastructure and b) giving money to those who refuse to work. The latter is socialism; the former is not.

I guess the USSR wasn't socialist then, since it was illegal to not have a job if you were able to work.

PS. this is a trick statement.

 

[Bokanovsky]

I guess the USSR wasn't socialist then, since it was illegal to not have a job if you were able to work.

PS. this is a trick statement.

USSR was the ultimate manifestation of socialism. Virtually no gap between the rich and the poor. Everyone earned basically the same income, no matter if you were a doctor or a garbageman. Money didn’t matter much (because you couldn’t buy sh!t with it anyway). Everyone had a job but no one tried to do a good job. Free medicare for all but you get what you pay for. Everyone’s drunk all the time because hey, why wouldn’t you be? And the only people who actually had a decent life were the bureaucratic elite.

 

[AttackFormation]

USSR was the ultimate manifestation of socialism. Virtually no gap between the rich and the poor. Everyone earned basically the same income, no matter if you were a doctor or a garbageman. Money didn’t matter much (because you couldn’t buy sh!t with it anyway). Everyone had a job but no one tried to do a good job. Free medicare for all but you get what you pay for. Everyone’s drunk all the time because hey, why wouldn’t you be? And the only people who actually had a decent life were the bureaucratic elite.

That's not what you said though.

You said socialism was giving people money for refusing to work. Which is it?

 

[Trump]

She and everyone else, I do not understand, OVERLOOK or forget, her play-acting to be a Native American in order to get special privileges and favors. THAT, in itself, should make her go away.

So what?

She has acted a little bit to get some special treatment. Like tons and tons of others don’t lie, cheat, steal to get what they want.

Profiting off of affirmative action when you don't even belong to a particular RACE seems one of the most egregious acts a potential presidential candidate (let alone ANY kind of public office) could commit in today's politically correct world,

Didn’t Bush get arrested for drunk driving?

Didn’t Bill and Obama smoke (illegal) joints?

but here she is and everybody talking about her as if she's formidable. Her integrity is depleted from the outset, yet NO ONE repeats this original sin in conversation, writing, or debate. HOW IS THIS GONE UNDER THE RADAR NOW? It is just amnesia of the masses? People you'd never think would forget, seem to have forgotten.

If she keeps US out of pointless wars, doesn’t govern on a whim, doesn’t invade countries on fabricated evidence, doesn’t go hunting and shoot other people, she be as Native American as she wants.

Bro it’s obvious you are making it personal.

 

[samspade]

All I governments take, I agree with that. However, there is a difference between a) taking money to spend on things that we all need and benefit from, like national defense, law enforcement and infrastructure and b) giving money to those who refuse to work. The latter is socialism; the former is not.

What we "need" is subjective. "We" is just another word for the collective. What I need and what you need are different and up to the individual, not government. You are already attempting to tell me what I need and what I will benefit from - that's how socialism starts.

Infrastructure can be paid for privately. Law enforcement can't protect me better than I can protect myself. National defense causes more problems than it solves, requiring more pilfered tax money.

And it's not like you get to choose what you pay for. I only choose to pay for these and other programs because the alternative, going to jail, is worse for me.

All government is inefficient collectivism.

 

[Alvafe]

feh and then it turn to left vs right.

this kind of discussion looks more like, choosing who gonna steal from you

 

[Trump]

Sounds like you are making it personal.

So basically she can limit heritage Americans by taxing them to pay for "minorities", and THEN she can steal that money back for herself by claiming she is a "minority", and you are cool with that.

Steal all you want from us, and deceive us, but please, PLEASE don't go hunting!

Not saying it’s right or wrong.

Saying lots of politicians have done the same or worse. Why is Elizabeth Warren being singled out?

 

[Poonani Maker]

So what?

She has acted a little bit to get some special treatment. Like tons and tons of others don’t lie, cheat, steal to get what they want.

Yeah, but you go to Jail for impersonating a police officer don't you? a felon. How much more so should this woman go to jail for gaining taxpayer (Harvard or whatever is state and federally funded) money for claiming to be an Indian? She's a fraud. This ALSO shows how there's no such thing as "White Privilege" anymore but the direct opposite.

 

[MatureDJ]

The problem is your assertion that "having a job" is the same as working.

The state pretended to pay them so they pretended to work ...

 

[redskinsfan92]

Gentlemen, shall we analyze this for what it is with a redpill lens. Her statements are part of what conditions us. These statements add up on the subconscious. They are based on a set of bluepill beliefs and ideals.

"I'm going to assume its a guy that said that."
What a loaded statement. She says that hinting there is something wrong with that belief. Since it is an "incorrect belief", a man must have said it.

"Assuming you can find one,"
This clearly indicates many things. Since she assumes only a man would be against gay marriage, she assumes women support it. Therefore, since the man does not bow to agreeing with women and the gynocracy, he will have trouble finding a woman. Get on the plantation! You don't have a chance with women unless you fall inline. That's what these small "jokes" are designed to make you think.

A young man hear's this and thinks, "Oh no. I must be agreeable and woke to get women!" He then states, "I support gay marriage. I am a gay ally!" He thinks that will surely curry favor with the ladies.