Hi, welcome to 2008. Those I-pod thingies? Like the Walkman, but better.I'm just weirded out by the thought of meeting people through the Internet.
Oh, and you guys forgot: "no kids." Better fix that!
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Hi, welcome to 2008. Those I-pod thingies? Like the Walkman, but better.I'm just weirded out by the thought of meeting people through the Internet.
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Duuuuude.......I don't know why I didn't do this sooner, cause with the success of my "reverse qualification" ad for a cleaning service and the number of models I had ready to work for free.....well.....stupid me.mrRuckus said:I really didn't think cute/hot women were actually on craigslist. I sure don't see them posted in the "women looking for men" section. That seems to have about nothing but fat ladies who call themselves "curvy."
LOL....yea, I can only wonder how much internet dating will continue to grow as Gen X (the first generation to grow up with PC's) gets older and people get busier and busier with less time for a social life.Phyzzle said:Hi, welcome to 2008. Those I-pod thingies? Like the Walkman, but better.
Oh, and you guys forgot: "no kids." Better fix that!
Christmas was probably a bad time to post the ad. I've looked this morning and haven't gotten any more replies and it's been pretty much pushed down to the bottom with lots of guys posting how lonely they are on christmas and how they want a woman to worship. Sigh. Yeah i'm sure women want a guy who has NO ONE to spend christmas with. What a cool dude.Colossus said:Awesome idea. Nothing original, but definitely a bold idea. I am almost inclined to try it myself.![]()
Of course you get the inevitable "belittling women" card. Massive insecurity.
Funny how a starkly honest, confident assessment of yourself and what you want is construed as misogyny. Its threatening to some women.
I personally would encourage you to take it a step further and date some of your positive responders. Put your online experiment to a real-world test. Start a thread about your results and assess the validity of your method.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
I don't own an I-pod. When I ride the bus or the subway I just prefer to listen to strangers' conversations.Phyzzle said:Hi, welcome to 2008. Those I-pod thingies? Like the Walkman, but better.
Oh, and you guys forgot: "no kids." Better fix that!
Yeah, it's obnoxious that it is misconstrued as misogyny. If a girl posted a similar message, saying she was a prize and that she had qualifications for dating her, no one would bat an eye.mrRuckus said:It's construed as misogyny just because it's the opposite of most guys. It's viewed as the other extreme and women are used to being in control. The natural reaction is to shrink away and be reviled... EXCEPT for the more confident women who want to rise to the challenge and prove that they are among the best and among the responses so far that's what they're doing... trying to prove they match all those qualities listed.
Heh.. wiser my ass. And which part of "do not email me if you don't match these prereqs" is so hard?"Hello my dear, as I must admit before furthering this conversation that I do not fit one of your prerequisites, which is not
a downfall for me! I just wanted you that I am older and wiser and must share some tidbit of information to you.
First, you speak about privileged well before you jump to such assumption you should first see if you are even worthy of the
one you choose before hurdling that obstacle.
Secondly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and if you thought that woman that occupied bars or clubs where a good catch
then you may want to look deeper within your inner self.
Thirdly, the exclusivity is really something that comes from both not one.
And lastly, just be careful in your choices and know that you must be able to equally give as much as you receive and not
with the same gesture.
Ex: if your girlfriend cooks you dinner, then you should show her your appreciation with flowers, candle and a bath not take
her our to dinner or necessarily you cook dinner.
Hope you did not take me personal/debatable as I am just trying to clue you into the female world. I think you will draw in
superficial woman who one know not to do this or that to catch you.
Take care and good luck!!"
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
You know, lately ALL of my interactions with chicks have been an "experiment". I don't take them seriously anymore!Colossus said:I personally would encourage you to take it a step further and date some of your positive responders. Put your online experiment to a real-world test. Start a thread about your results and assess the validity of your method.
Yea, these ads are like a giant 64 million color LED billboard among a bunch of crappy hand painted signs.MikeYikes122 said:Yeah, it's obnoxious that it is misconstrued as misogyny. If a girl posted a similar message, saying she was a prize and that she had qualifications for dating her, no one would bat an eye.
I think one of the reasons this works so well is because next to all those other guys who post on there, pining for a woman to put on a pedestal, post likes ours are going to stand out. I was just kind of perusing the men seeking women section and there are either a lot of foreigners (might be unique for my area) or a bunch of desperate, pathetic-sounding posters.
aliasguy said:Amazing the difference, when you look at the realities in the clear light of day. Aren't we lucky, guys?
In reality, we really DO have it so much better than women, whose value falls off so rapidly.
STR8UP said:Placing an ad like this automatically puts you in the drivers seat when someone responds. Notice how most of the positive replies have essentially stated at the end "I hope you choose me for a date"? Now I have all the power. I can go in and no matter HOW attractive she is I can downplay her looks, so if she is at all interested by MY pic it will amplify it that much more. Then if I can just keep the frame all the way through it's in the bag.
To answer you question: Im not surprised by your post. I can see how it would anger some women. These women, though, are immature and mostly likely don't have very high expectations. I think that you have to have the highest expectations if you EXPECT to get what you want. So, your angry women emails are those who aim low. It's also possible that they are thrown off by someone who actually lists out his exact wants and desires in a mate. But, what they don't realize is that whenever people come together, in whatever situation, their already subconsciously sizing up the opposite person in exactly the same kind of way. In their minds, they run through a list, "does he have this, does he have that, is he cute, does he want sex, does he work out...yada yada yada". So, it seems "bold" for someone to list these things. But, I feel it's only fair to you to expect someone who matches you, on all levels. I expect there to be equality in my relationships. I feel this way because I am in the same situation. I expect the best in all I do….why would I settle for less in the person I may potentially spend the rest of my life with?!? That is why I responded.
In general, I don't want you to misunderstand me or over-analyze what I say. Ill throw out some "safety" phrases just because most people take offense easily or take my personal bluntness the wrong way. Like with my racism comment. I guess it's my way of testing the waters and seeing how you interpret and respond to things. You are obviously of a higher caliber so you understand what Im trying to say. But, there are people who mistake "I seek a higher quality person" for being racist.
So, Ive written another long email. I would love you know more about you. Interests? Whatever you'd like to talk about. Did you have a good Christmas?
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
Yea, it's funny, because unlike some women who's laundry list consists of SPECIFIC attributes that typically cannot be met by any one man alive (at least 6' tall, muscular, high paying job, hung like a horse), the list that us guys sent out was very GENERAL. Almost ANY woman could meet those criteria, if only in her mind. It wasn't set up to disqualify, it was set up to put the woman into qualifying MODE.aliasguy said:And I thought more, and read this thread again, and I see the responses that you guys report, and I consider the straightforward "criteria" you have used in these ads. And, to be honest, the "criteria" you listed were reasonable, clear, and understandable. AND, most importantly, they are essentially REALISTIC. You CAN get a woman with these qualities.
Yeah, again, it's because some women will diss you, but they do it in a way so as to make them not appear rude, because they don't want you to think badly of them, even though they may hate your guts. It's an ego thing.Got my first letter from a woman (reads like a foreigner) who seems against my ad, but not totally:
When these ladies are writing you to tell you how, in their opinion, wrong you are, and they're even boasting about how they're glad they don't fit your parameters, and talking down to you, you're seeing a "mmmmm, get in touch with me!" somewhere in there? Okay, that's cool, if you wanna get more of a tongue lashing. And not the good kind.Notice that she kind of complains and says she doesn't match the prereqs (i presume she's too old) but still left the door open to further conversation.
I thought Oprah was covering that!I am just trying to clue you into the female world.
Uh oh, that means she's ugly!!!!!Secondly, beauty is in the eye of the beholder
You violated her 'belief system' which holds that men are not entitled to have expectations of women - women are the only ones who are allowed to have "lists" of requirements. THey believe that it is our "job" to fulfil their whims, wishes, wants and needs.STR8UP said:There was absolutely nothing in the ad that insulted or "belittled" women. It stated that my recent experiences with dating had failed to live up to my expectations, and listed what I expect from a woman.
...
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.