couples advice on msn.com

[mzilla2]

Over the noonhour, persusing some of the advice given on there.

""He's Hooked on Online Porn" was the article.

For a chick counsellor, some of the advice is suprisingly sound:

""That said, I also told Mia a blunt truth that many women don't want to hear: 'If you reject a man sexually, he's eventually going to go elsewhere.' I know this sounds like marital advice from the 1950s, but that makes it no less true. 'For a man,' I explained, 'sex is the greatest index of love. When Carson's physical needs are met and he feels desired, his confidence will skyrocket and his need for pornography will diminish.'"

And some of it not so much:

""'You have to stop denigrating her emotions,' I told Carson. 'Your actions deeply upset her, and for that reason alone, you have to stop.'"

Link: http://lifestyle.msn.com/relationships/couplesandmarriage/articlelhj.aspx?cp-documentid=5139133&page=1

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

...And some of it not so much:

""'You have to stop denigrating her emotions,' I told Carson. 'Your actions deeply upset her, and for that reason alone, you have to stop.'"
...

Why not? Women will withhold sex from guys who they don't feel an emotional connection to. A guy attacking a woman's emotions doesn't usually get very far sexually with her.

 

[mzilla2]

Interesting, I just thought it counter intuitive to the "DJ" theory of not letting her emotions run or shake you...

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Interesting, I just thought it counter intuitive to the "DJ" theory of not letting her emotions run or shake you...

A woman who is emotionally happy in a relationship is normally very receptive to her man's needs. How would upsetting her emotionally be beneficial?

 

[Latinoman]

Interesting, I just thought it counter intuitive to the "DJ" theory of not letting her emotions run or shake you...

It is his wife for Christ sake. If she is emotionally stable, so would be their sexual life and relationship in general.