cool rating system for ability of guys with women

[khash]

A rating system for distribution of ability of guys with women. Sort of like the IQ test.

The numbers are out of roughly 3 billion guys on earth and does not take into account LTRs. , but simply based on potential ability to attract different females.



100 1/500 M Can have sex with 1 Hb 9+ per day( different ones)
given time has plenty of Hb 8-10 to choose from.


95-100 1/ 50 M Can have sex with Hb 9+ roughly 4 times a week.

can get any Hb 9 and under he wishes

90-95 1/5 M Can have sex with Hb 9+ 2-3 times a week and can get almost any under 9 HB.

85-90 1/500,000 Can get a Hb 9+ once every week. Can get under hb 9 almost any time he wishes.

80-85 1/100 000 can have sex with a Hb 9+ about twice a month. Can get under 9 most of the time.

75-80 1/10 000 can have sex with a Hb 9+ once every month. Can get under 9 with a decent success rate and has slept with many in the past.

70-75 1/1000 can get sex with Hb 9+ several times a year and can usually pull off girls with no trouble. Has plenty of experience with girls.

65-70 1/100 sex with Hb 9+ about once a year. most of the girls he pulls are between 7-9 and he usually has no touble getting girls.

60-65 1/50 rarely sleeps with Hb 9+. Can pull hb 8-9 but not very often. he is sexually active and most girls he sleeps with are between 6-9.

55-60 1/25 never sleep with hb 9+ or is extremely rare. has difficulty attracting 8-9s, but is sexually active and gets laid few times a month. most girls he sleeps with are between 5-8.

50-55 1/10 never sleeps with hb 9+. getting a hot chick is usually rare for him. he is sexually active and gets laid few times a year however.

45-50 1/5 never sleep with hb9+. dont pull of hot chicks or is extremely rare. usually arent active in the dating scene and donnt get a lot of chicks. get laid very rarely.

40-45 1/3 have very little experience with women. maybe they have gotten laid based on luck but are usually not sexually active and not used to attracting beautiful girls.

40 and below 1/2 dont get laid at all.

 

[tmpgstx]

Kewl rating system but seems to be skewed. The scale starts out what would seem true to form and then gets very liberal ..for example,

1/5 never sleep with HB9+ ..

that's saying 4/5 guys do sleep with HB9+ or 80%!

We all know *that* isn't true.

Basically, the first half the scale says most guys do not sleep with HB9+ .. but then... the last half says most guys sleep with HB9+

 

[khash]

no dude..looll

its simply a continuation from the scale above it. for isntance....1/5 guys that dont sleep with hb 9+ women doesnt mean 80% do. .......that means 1/5 guys never sleep with hb9+. dont pull of hot chicks or is extremely rare. usually arent active in the dating scene and donnt get a lot of chicks. get laid very rarely.

 

[American_Psycho]

Kewl rating system but seems to be skewed. The scale starts out what would seem true to form and then gets very liberal ..for example,

1/5 never sleep with HB9+ ..

that's saying 4/5 guys do sleep with HB9+ or 80%!

We all know *that* isn't true.

Basically, the first half the scale says most guys do not sleep with HB9+ .. but then... the last half says most guys sleep with HB9+

You're thinking of it the wrong way. It's a percentile scale, like guys in the 40 and below category are the bottom 50% of all men. Guys in the 40-45 range are in the 50-66% range, aka 66% of all men have a score of 45 or below. Guys in the 45-50 range are in the 66%-80% range, meaning 80% of men have a score of 50 or below.

On the top end of the scale, the ~60 guys in the world with a score of 100 have better game than 99.99999998% of men.

At least that's how I interpreted it, the OP might have meant something different.

 

[tmpgstx]

I see.. it still doesn't make sense to me because say 1/5 guys in the 66-80% of males range (45-50) have *not* slept with an HB9+ as indicated. This would be saying 80% (4/5) sleep or have slept with an HB9+.

It would then be saying that 80% of males of which 80% of these males (4/5) have slept with an HB9+. It in turn would then be saying that well over half the male population have slept with HB9+

Oh well, not here to make a big deal about it..A for effort..lol

 

[American_Psycho]

I see.. it still doesn't make sense to me because say 1/5 guys in the 66-80% of males range (45-50) have *not* slept with an HB9+ as indicated. This would be saying 80% (4/5) sleep or have slept with an HB9+.

It would then be saying that 80% of males of which 80% of these males (4/5) have slept with an HB9+. It in turn would then be saying that well over half the male population have slept with HB9+

Oh well, not here to make a big deal about it..A for effort..lol

Let's say for example you have a score of 50. According to my interpretation, you would be in the 80th percentile. This means you are better than 80% of all men, and equal to or worse than the other 20%. So in other words, you are in the top 1/5th of all men. That top 1/5th includes guys like you that lay HB9+s occasionally, as well as all the other guys who lay HB9+s more frequently (all guys with a score >= 50). The other 4/5ths are the bottom 80%, aka the guys who are only getting laid rarely or not at all (guys with score <50).

 

[Chipleader]

Im at the 55 mark

 

[khash]

american psycho is precise!

if you have a score of 50- that means out of 5 guys, only 1 can be found with your ability.
or as american psyho put it, you are in the 80% percentile, ahead of 4/5 or 80% of guys.

 

[tmpgstx]

Thanks guys ..makes more sense ..lol. So much for my four college stats classes i had.

 

[DonJuanByNature]

THIS IS ALL BULL****... cause a lot of times, there are few 9+ girls.. and also what I might consider a 9+ u might consider a 6... the point to the I.Q. should be focused on getting LAID ... THATS ALL.. i.e. P.U.SSY is P.U.SSY, no matter how you look at it (within reason ofcourse).. and as long as you hitting A LOT of VERIETY, which different people consider different, your DonJuan, i.e.. and rita and heather and sally and lisa and so on and so on and so on...
Noobs :moon: