jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
Here's a revised version with improved grammar and clarity:
We often believe we need to achieve extraordinary fame and success, leading us to compare ourselves to individuals who have reached remarkable heights. Every man must consider a mountain top, but, have you considered that "success" might be relative to one's specific context?
Context can be defined by your city, social circles, and acquaintances. It seems that women are just in tunnel vision mode, focusing on immediate needs and overlooking the broader perspective. For example, within a group of ten people, with five men and five women, comparisons and distinctions inevitably arise. Questions like "Who is the most attractive?", "Who is the wealthiest?", or "Who is the most masculine?" become central within that limited scope, based on the resources and qualities present.
Everything is relative to "context".
A man's opportunities and potential are defined by his surroundings.
This explains why someone from America or Italy might be perceived as highly desirable in a place like the Philippines.
Also, this explains the many cheathing when your GF change/upgrade her social circle, like entering uni or a new workplace and met a men who's an upgrade in that context.
The challenge lies in understanding how to maintain your perceived value as you grow and your social circles expand. What happens when your partner becomes attracted to someone else who, at that moment, appears to represent a more advantageous position? That is because you've lost value in that limited context perspective, not in the worlwide scene.
This thing works.
Women "love" a man judging those things.
But a Man MUST remember to apply his mountain top, and those qualities, to his immediate context.
This is why we should strive to find the right thing we want to do in life, and then apply that to a context, or we'll never be happy or find that wellbeing. (Just look at famous people who die of drugs).
I want to hear more from you guys!
We often believe we need to achieve extraordinary fame and success, leading us to compare ourselves to individuals who have reached remarkable heights. Every man must consider a mountain top, but, have you considered that "success" might be relative to one's specific context?
Context can be defined by your city, social circles, and acquaintances. It seems that women are just in tunnel vision mode, focusing on immediate needs and overlooking the broader perspective. For example, within a group of ten people, with five men and five women, comparisons and distinctions inevitably arise. Questions like "Who is the most attractive?", "Who is the wealthiest?", or "Who is the most masculine?" become central within that limited scope, based on the resources and qualities present.
Everything is relative to "context".
A man's opportunities and potential are defined by his surroundings.
This explains why someone from America or Italy might be perceived as highly desirable in a place like the Philippines.
Also, this explains the many cheathing when your GF change/upgrade her social circle, like entering uni or a new workplace and met a men who's an upgrade in that context.
The challenge lies in understanding how to maintain your perceived value as you grow and your social circles expand. What happens when your partner becomes attracted to someone else who, at that moment, appears to represent a more advantageous position? That is because you've lost value in that limited context perspective, not in the worlwide scene.
This thing works.
Women "love" a man judging those things.
But a Man MUST remember to apply his mountain top, and those qualities, to his immediate context.
This is why we should strive to find the right thing we want to do in life, and then apply that to a context, or we'll never be happy or find that wellbeing. (Just look at famous people who die of drugs).
I want to hear more from you guys!
