Chicks, status, and their "preference" lists

[djjizzyjeff]

Just needs reiteration that chicks are for the most part self serving and to take everything they say or claim they like with a grain on slat.

Think of things they claim they "only" prefer. Certain races, types of dudes etc. Most times chicks will just say that to self serve themselves at that point in time to a dude they may be interested in or to please the crowd.

Most chicks are puppets and will go with whatever makes them seem "cool" and or "with it".

Take for example a hot white chick. She likes some good looking white dude so she'll say whatever it is she thinks he wants to hear. (Most chicks of all races will do that.)

Same chick winds up getting hit on by a professional baller, rapper, star of a different race...Do you REALLY think she WON'T give her number to him and go out with that dude even if it's on the sly?

Again the point of this thread is to simply take whatever chicks tell you at the time with a grain of salt, because they constantly change their minds and or are puppets to what the media tells them, especially if their friends are sheep (which most are). Whatever their "requirements" are will go right out the window if the all-star NFL player or whomever of higher status movie star or town heart throb comes calling.

You have to treat them like the local kid who's always known for telling stories and expecting everyone to believe them. There's no point in arguing or telling them you know they are full of it. It's a waste of time. You simply smile and yes them to death.

 

[Smok1nAce]

you do have good points OP, but i think that most of the time its the childish women who fall into this trend.

 

[PlayHer Man]

This is what I try to tell the beta's on this site who still dream of bonding with a precious clean white princess who has never touched another man (especially of another race).

There are many men on this site who are delusional. They claim to have taken the red pill but they still secretly hope to achieve the blue pill in life. In the back of their minds they still want the "traditional family" with marriage to a beautiful and innocent virgin bride who will be loyal for life and stay hot and skinny for life. Dream on beta faggots.. it ain't gonna happen. :crackup: :crackup:

In 2013 the worst thing a man can do is have a possessive attitude towards women. The days of owning them are gone. You will never own a woman and if you try you will get raped both emotionally and financially via divorce / toxic marriage.

Just spin plates and be the best man you can be. George Clooney has it right.

 

[PlayHer Man]

Wanting to fulfill ones biological imperative of raising kids in a stable and healthy environment does not make one a "beta f@ggot". I would rather have a stable woman to raise kids while I pursue things I value a lot more than sex. That doesn't mean I don't realize that that is virtually impossible with a modern AMERICAN woman. Spinning plates is therefore a necessary evil. The only delusional posters are the ones like Zarky who claim that women are incapable of motherhood and stability and that that is somehow a good thing for society and how dare you criticize it.

Its actually a woman's biological imperative to "raise kids in a stable and healthy environment". Men are biologically designed to spread their seed and only stick around for a short period of time until the kids are big enough to talk and function.

The committed, stable, ever-present father is a societal invention. It has nothing to do with biology.

Does this mean the deadbeat dad who is never around is a good thing? NO. But its far from unnatural for a male to leave once his kids no longer need protection or even before the kids are born. There is nothing biological in men that makes them want to RAISE kids. Only produce them.

 

[Who Dares Win]

I think biologically men may want to raise their own son. It would be like building an extension of yourself.

Agree with this, nature want us not only to reproduce but to make sure that our sons manage to survive and prosper (so they can reproduce themselves and at good terms), sure there are men who have a different mating strategy like fvcking as many women as possible despite size,age,race,backround and health and then disappear....these men clearly feed the bottom of society in terms of fvckheads and criminals and when such thing become cultural a shi1 hole country raise.

When it becomes the norm to fvck like animals without even caring of your own offspring no wonder the whole country is a guerrilla republic.

I'm not denying the animalistic nature of men sexual habists but at the same time nature suggest stupid useless things through instincts.

If nature wanted us to only impregnate women and move to the other we would still live in some tribal group like the stone age.
To live a offspring first and a legacy later is what created civilization, thats why men rule this world unlike apes or some other ancesors of ours.

 

[JohnChops]

This is what I try to tell the beta's on this site who still dream of bonding with a precious clean white princess who has never touched another man (especially of another race).

There are many men on this site who are delusional. They claim to have taken the red pill but they still secretly hope to achieve the blue pill in life. In the back of their minds they still want the "traditional family" with marriage to a beautiful and innocent virgin bride who will be loyal for life and stay hot and skinny for life. Dream on beta faggots.. it ain't gonna happen. :crackup: :crackup:

In 2013 the worst thing a man can do is have a possessive attitude towards women. The days of owning them are gone. You will never own a woman and if you try you will get raped both emotionally and financially via divorce / toxic marriage.

Just spin plates and be the best man you can be. George Clooney has it right.

I agree with everything except not being positive towards women. I feel like you should be indifferent, no need to be negative in any aspect of your life. That just bogs you down. Women are just sources of fun, thats it.

 

[Bokanovsky]

What is it with all the racial trolling lately? If you want to talk about interracial dating, there are dozens of message boards out there devoted to that subject. This is not one of them.

 

[backbreaker]

Mike Tyson was once asked about an upcoming fight and teh fighter said that he had a plan that would knock Iron Mike out without question

His response

"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth"

 

[PlayHer Man]

Agree with this, nature want us not only to reproduce but to make sure that our sons manage to survive and prosper (so they can reproduce themselves and at good terms), sure there are men who have a different mating strategy like fvcking as many women as possible despite size,age,race,backround and health and then disappear....these men clearly feed the bottom of society in terms of fvckheads and criminals and when such thing become cultural a shi1 hole country raise.

When it becomes the norm to fvck like animals without even caring of your own offspring no wonder the whole country is a guerrilla republic.

I'm not denying the animalistic nature of men sexual habists but at the same time nature suggest stupid useless things through instincts.

If nature wanted us to only impregnate women and move to the other we would still live in some tribal group like the stone age.
To live a offspring first and a legacy later is what created civilization, thats why men rule this world unlike apes or some other ancesors of ours.

I find it odd how you always try to use nature to justify your own personal beliefs and values.

In another thread you used nature to justify racism and now you're trying to say nature supports the family unit. In the end these are all YOUR values and have nothing to do with nature.

There is nothing biological in men that makes them want to raise kids. Nature doesn't care what society finds "acceptable". Society is not nature. Society is man made and varies greatly from culture to culture.. thus PROOF that society its NOT a natural thing otherwise it would be uniform among all groups of humans (this means no different cultures).

A great white shark in America behaves just like a great white shark in China. That is NATURE. A dog that does tricks is not nature. It was TRAINED.

Men were designed to spread their seed to as many women as possible because fatality rates were high for both kids and mothers. So it made sense to impregnate as many women as possible. Nature doesn't care who "agrees" with this behavior or not.

 

[Who Dares Win]

I find it odd how you always try to use nature to justify your own personal beliefs and values.

In another thread you used nature to justify racism and now you're trying to say nature supports the family unit. In the end these are all YOUR values and have nothing to do with nature.

There is nothing biological in men that makes them want to raise kids. Nature doesn't care what society finds "acceptable". Society is not nature. Society is man made and varies greatly from culture to culture.. thus PROOF that society its NOT a natural thing otherwise it would be uniform among all groups of humans (this means no different cultures).

A great white shark in America behaves just like a great white shark in China. That is NATURE. A dog that does tricks is not nature. It was TRAINED.

Men were designed to spread their seed to as many women as possible because fatality rates were high for both kids and mothers. So it made sense to impregnate as many women as possible. Nature doesn't care who "agrees" with this behavior or not.

As I said many times, nature makes much more sense than mainstream modern culture or any other politically correct bvllsh1t.


Those antropologists telling you now that men only want to spread their seed around as much as possible, are the same ones saying less than 100 years ago that certain facial features were a sign of inferiority and potential criminal behaviour...in case you wanna doubt what they told you and think about yourself.

Sure many men will behave like that, no doubt about it just like many societies in this world still live as the pre industrial era but its not the rules.

I believe in nature more than nurture, you can think otherwise and its fine to me but I take very seriously those studies which shows that certain behaviour depends on social conditions but only because they activates genes which are already in position at birth.

As men I think we share such structure which want us to do certain things which goes way beyond than banging any possible woman around and leave her and the kids on welfare first and on the street later.

 

[PlayHer Man]

Playher,

Wanting the women of your own tribe to stick within her tribe is not racist. It is a natural function of men and how they are programmed.

It happens interfaith, it happens internationally, it happens interculturally, it happens interracially. It transcends racism. You only call it racism because it interferes with your desire, the white woman. The goto method for dealing with white men, especially around white women, is to use the racist card. That is why you continue to pound that mantra.

If anything, this is closer to ethnocentrism than anything else (although that still wouldn't be the right word). It is not against a specific race, it is about preserving the long-term viability of the tribe. Let's face it, women and eggs are a critical natural resource for the long-term viability of any tribe. This is why men work so hard to protect it from other cultures, religions, races, or nations.

Now, I know you and others will come back at me with all manner of shaming mechanisms, but it does not change the reality of what I say. You can see it the world over and how men react to women of their tribe going outside of said tribe.

Men with options don't care. They already have access to the women "of their tribe" (or another's tribe) that they desire.

Just like a King with 10 wives doesn't give a sh!t about a random woman in this kingdom with a low status man. If he want's that SPECIFIC woman.. he will STEAL her from the lesser man. Easy.

Its the men who can't do this that feel "threatened" because they feel like the "lesser man" where they shouldn't be. :crackup: :crackup:

Beta faggots with limited options are the only ones with the "tribe" mentality. And like I said in the last thread --> The majority of men are betas. Therefore, the majority of men are threatened by other men. Simple as that.

No "shaming". If you feel shamed by the word "beta" because you believe it applies to you.. then STOP being a beta. Otherwise, own the label and keep getting mad when you see interracial couples. I'll continue to bang women of all races and I don't care if some men cry at night because of it.

 

[Bokanovsky]

Men with options don't care. They already have access to the women "of their tribe" (or another's tribe) that they desire.

You are 100% wrong about this. Going back to prehistortic times, men would attack hostile tribes, steal their women, while at the same time guarding their own women against suffering a similar fate. As tits said, women were a seen as a resource. It was no different from plundering another tribe's territory for food or gold.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Men with options don't care. They already have access to the women "of their tribe" (or another's tribe) that they desire.

Just like a King with 10 wives doesn't give a sh!t about a random woman in this kingdom with a low status man. If he want's that SPECIFIC woman.. he will STEAL her from the lesser man. Easy.

Its the men who can't do this that feel "threatened" because they feel like the "lesser man" where they shouldn't be. :crackup: :crackup:

Beta faggots with limited options are the only ones with the "tribe" mentality. And like I said in the last thread --> The majority of men are betas. Therefore, the majority of men are threatened by other men. Simple as that.

No "shaming". If you feel shamed by the word "beta" because you believe it applies to you.. then STOP being a beta. Otherwise, own the label and keep getting mad when you see interracial couples. I'll continue to bang women of all races and I don't care if some men cry at night because of it.

I believe "beta fagg0ts" are those who cant have what they want so they blame and shame others for being fine with such situation, but its my opinion as usual.

 

[PlayHer Man]

You are 100% wrong about this. Going back to prehistortic times, men would attack hostile tribes, steal their women, while at the same time guarding their own women against suffering a similar fate. As tits said, women were a seen as a resource. It was no different from plundering another tribe's territory for food or gold.

Maybe you should read the entire post and not just the first sentence. The majority of men are low beta faggots. The top alphas with access to multiple women don't have the same need to fight for women.

The top alpha only cares about the specific women he desires. Likewise.. most white guys here only care about the attractive white women. When a non-white man is with an ugly or FAT white woman.. no one seems to care. :crackup: :crackup:

So I'm 100% correct.

The bottom line is.. many men here are beta faggots and are trying to twist things around to protect their own frail egos.

I believe "beta fagg0ts" are those who cant have what they want so they blame and shame others for being fine with such situation, but its my opinion as usual.

This.. I agree with.

 

[djjizzyjeff]

Men with options don't care. They already have access to the women "of their tribe" (or another's tribe) that they desire.

Just like a King with 10 wives doesn't give a sh!t about a random woman in this kingdom with a low status man. If he want's that SPECIFIC woman.. he will STEAL her from the lesser man. Easy.

Its the men who can't do this that feel "threatened" because they feel like the "lesser man" where they shouldn't be. :crackup: :crackup:

Beta faggots with limited options are the only ones with the "tribe" mentality. And like I said in the last thread --> The majority of men are betas. Therefore, the majority of men are threatened by other men. Simple as that.

No "shaming". If you feel shamed by the word "beta" because you believe it applies to you.. then STOP being a beta. Otherwise, own the label and keep getting mad when you see interracial couples. I'll continue to bang women of all races and I don't care if some men cry at night because of it.

LMAO ThisPlayherman is a KJ.

There is no man who has unlimited options to have whatever chick he wants. No one. Join us on planet earth playherman the beta KJ.

Keep dreaming kid. People have their own thoughts and free will. They can like what they like and not like what they don't. "Betas" dude you ain't getting laid for ish you azzclown.

And for the record I'll take the "beta" chick who dates within her race whether "Alpha" playherman likes it or not or thinks he's "Alpha" because he claims its "beta" if some other dude chooses to date chicks who date within their race.

Playherman the KJ introduces the "Alpha/beta" race card to the seduction community. LMAO. clown

 

[PlayHer Man]

LMAO ThisPlayherman is a KJ.

There is no man who has unlimited options to have whatever chick he wants. No one. Join us on planet earth playherman the beta KJ.

Keep dreaming kid. People have their own thoughts and free will. They can like what they like and not like what they don't. "Betas" dude you ain't getting laid for ish you azzclown.

And for the record I'll take the "beta" chick who dates within her race whether "Alpha" playherman likes it or not or thinks he's "Alpha" because he claims its "beta" if some other dude chooses to date chicks who date within their race.

Playherman the KJ introduces the "Alpha/beta" race card to the seduction community. LMAO. clown

HAHA Looks like someone's mad! :box:

Being called a beta faggot by a man I view as a beta faggot means nothing to me.

I really don't care what other men choose to do or what other men like or don't like. I'm stating my position on the subject. If my position upsets you, then that's a personal problem.

If you don't like women that date outside their race.. that's not my problem. Doesn't stop me from f*cking them.

If you want hot white women.. the go get them! But if you're gonna cry like a faggot when a hot white woman sucks a black, Asian or Hispanic dude.. then don't get mad when I call you a beta faggot.

The fact that I have yet to be offended by any of the weak beta faggots on this site (while offending most of them) explains why I can successfully f*ck women of many different "tribes" while having no need to cry on the Internet over what other men an pull.

I give a high five to any man who pulls a hottie.

Sucks to be a beta (I imagine). :crackup: :crackup:

 

[djjizzyjeff]

HAHA Looks like someone's mad! :box:

Being called a beta faggot by a man I view as a beta faggot means nothing to me.

I really don't care what other men choose to do or what other men like or don't like. I'm stating my position on the subject. If my position upsets you, then that's a personal problem.

If you don't like women that date outside their race.. that's not my problem. Doesn't stop me from f*cking them.

If you want hot white women.. the go get them! But if you're gonna cry like a faggot when a hot white woman sucks a black, Asian or Hispanic dude.. then don't get mad when I call you a beta faggot.

The fact that I have yet to be offended by any of the weak beta faggots on this site (while offending most of them) explains why I can successfully f*ck women of many different "tribes" while having no need to cry on the Internet over what other men an pull.

I give a high five to any man who pulls a hottie.

Sucks to be a beta (I imagine). :crackup: :crackup:

Who cares what some chick does. You simply choose to or not to date that person based on your personal preferences. Keep KJing playhersupreme man. You ain't gettin jack squat. But if it makes you feel better to throw out the alpha/beta nonsense. Go for it. LMAO

 

[PlayHer Man]

Playher,

Try to understand, I am only explaining to you why it happens and why it isn't racism. Do not confuse that with people hating you for it.

No need to call names or anything like that. Resorting to insults doesn't change any of my argument. I don't care what you do with what women, but insulting people for explaining the logistics of the topic is meaningless.

There is no argument about options here. This is not about one individual being mad at someone for getting a woman he cannot get. It isn't about "getting hot women at all", it is about protecting the long-term viability of a tribe (a form of ethnocentrism). If it was about getting hot women, then ALL men would be hated for having a pretty girl. Instead, as Who_Dares articulated so well in his examples, it is about the men of a tribe protecting what they consider a resource for their tribe. Therefore there is nothing Beta about it.

Danger that would make sense if most men were equally "protective" of the UGLY members of their race. When a fugly freakshow white female gets with a non-white man.. no one seems to care about it. Its only when the woman is ATTRACTIVE or even average that it becomes an issue.

I said in another thread that men who pull ATTRACTIVE women generally get hated on by beta faggots. I've experienced it and I've known other men who have as well. Plus some have written about it on this site.

So my default assumption is these men are mad because someone who they view as "lower status" has access to something they don't.

Its similar to people who want to scratch nice cars in a parking lot out of jealously.. like "F*ck this guy for having money and nice stuff." But a man who has access to "nice stuff" would have no reason to care about another man with nice stuff.. would he?

You might be right that it's not pure racism in every case.. but I think we are kidding ourselves if we try to pretend entitlement doesn't play a BIG role here. "I deserve stuff because I was born white" is how it comes across with a lot of people posting on the topic (even if its not intentional).

Entitlement is a human quality that just gets under my skin.

 

[PlayHer Man]

I would have to disagree with this. Ethnocentrism or "tribal protection" still cares even about the "ugly resources". They just react less to it, because they are not as valuable a resource to said tribe.

Think of it like gold and copper. If people came in to harvest the gold resources from a nation, then there would be a much larger outrage than if it was copper resources. But the resource depletion still exists.

Either way though, there is outrage. Same concept goes for pretty girls versus ugly ones.



On an individual level you are right, and I get this as well. Even from my own "tribe", which means it isn't racism, but just beta's being beta's. Your mistake is assuming that this is ALWAYS the reson. But when people have an issue with anything outside the tribe, but not when it's internal, that is ethnocentrism, not beta. If they are ok with any tribes except one tribe in particular, then yes that is racist, or anti-religion, or anti-culture depending on the details.





This would be beta's hating on non-betas. This would not apply to ethnocentric tribe guarding.





This is where I think you unfairly blame "white". Again, it transcends ALL race, religious or cultural persecution. Ethnocentrism is not racist. It is merely regarding the world from the perspective of the tribe. It is not against any particular race, religion or culture. It just wants to protect it's own culture.

Take the Japanese society as an example. They aren't racist, but they are very ethnocentric and protective of their tribe and society.

Danger, I don't fully disagree with what you say here. However, its not always that simple. Also.. the tribal thing doesn't apply to ALL males. I know many men (myself included) who simply don't care if an attractive woman of my race is dating/f*cking a non-member.

So why is this "tribal" thing only in CERTAIN men???

Regarding the "white" issue. I'm not singling out the white race. I only focused on the white race because the people getting mad were white males about white females with non-whites.

If you've seen me in other race threads. I've charged black, Asian and other men of being beta faggots as well.

Entitlement and beta faggotry is what I have a problem with. The race of the beta faggot means nothing to me.

 

[Kbomb]

Its actually a woman's biological imperative to "raise kids in a stable and healthy environment". Men are biologically designed to spread their seed and only stick around for a short period of time until the kids are big enough to talk and function.

The committed, stable, ever-present father is a societal invention. It has nothing to do with biology.

Does this mean the deadbeat dad who is never around is a good thing? NO. But its far from unnatural for a male to leave once his kids no longer need protection or even before the kids are born. There is nothing biological in men that makes them want to RAISE kids. Only produce them.

This is bad science at best, and at worst its stupidity. Read up on your evolutionary psychology before you make these sweeping claims of which apparently you have very little info.

First, our evolution was generally spent in small knit groupings, of anywhere from 20 to 1000. You did not leave your group and leave your child behind because you could not survive outside of your group, or at least not survive well. You also had an extremely limited access to ***** without your group since you could either rape/kidnap a woman or try to join a different group to gain access to said vagina. This can keep going, but just pointing out how shortsighted that view is.