Changing member rankings

[manuva]

I have, I'm embarassed to admit, recently become - by default, mind - a Senior Don Juan. Whoop-de-effing-do.

Now, most of my posts have been in H&F forum, which is primarily my reason for being on this site, but I've read enough of the other forums to get a good chuckle out of the ranking system listed under each member's name.

I find them funny because they are inherently misleading. Newbies often post a question asking only 'Master Don Juans' to reply, as if the people who spend the most time propounding drivel on this forum are the people whose advice is most valid.

I put it to you that it isn't.

Certainly the people whose opinions I value most have very few posts up. Thats because it takes time to consider and then write a thoughtful, intelligent post. Also because people who have something useful to say about dealing with women are going to be busy dealling with them.

Anyone who has the time to write multiple posts EVERY DAY could not possibly be spending any significant amount of time in the field or f*cking a chick they met last weekend.

To clarify the situation, I've devised an ingenious new ranking system, to help people analyse a members status and thus determine his credibility based on his level of contribution to these forums. They are as follows:

Don Juan, the lowest rank, and the the rank issued to members upon joining, should be replaced with Possibly Capable of Contributing Something of Value.

Senior Don Juan, the second and middle rank, should be replaced with Probably a Keyboard Jockey.

Lastly, Master Don Juan, the highest and most esteemed of all member rankings, should be replaced with Definitely a Keyboard Jockey.

I think this should clear things up nicely. It brings clarity to a previously ambiguous ranking structure, and demonstrates far more clearly the value of the contributions made by said member.

 

[FRëSHURE]

You spend alot of time in the H&F do you?

I suggest you look for a guy there named "MindOverMatter" he's reason enough that your ranking system is actually worse.

even going by post averages per day. Look for "The Shezzler" his would be one of the higher post averages, but from his posts, I think he has the most potential of anyone here to actually become a GuruPUA.

There is merit in your idea. But the only way to do it properly would be to have a panel of judges who say "this guy is ready to be a 'master don juan'"

Better yet, you can ignore the post count, and remember the names of people who DO give good advice. Thats what I do. And its not hard as theres less then 30 guys who do. And I'm being very generous with my 30.

 

[spider_007]

for some reason i actually respect more the people who have been on here for more then a year (sometimes upto 3 or four). KBJ arn't usually on here more then a year, and then they get sick of posting and take off....