You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
Haha, step down from your soap box.backbreaker said:you are the ulitimate tool if you choose a
career path
SOLEY based on getting, or attempting to get social proof.
what the fuvck of a waste of a life. Have you guys not learned a damn thing with the thousands of posts on this forum?
I'm sure that any researcher who is studying live incredibly contagious and deadly infectious diseases in the laboratory would beg to differ with you.tigerstyle said:it takes a much larger set of balls to be acting, singing, and dancing in front of people then it does to say, look down a microscope in a laboratory (nothing against science, at all! just an example).
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
I definitely don't understand your logic there, but to each his own. If I started a thread about what everyone's favorite color was and how it made them feel... does that mean I am suggesting I might change my favorite color? No, no it doesn't.backbreaker said:the fact that you even started this thread suggests that you would alter your career path if certain hot women thought it was more accectable
I'm not on a soapbox. I'm trying to SAVE YOUR DAMN LIFE.
becuase you are a dumbass. that's why. and you know good and damn well what the intent of this thread was, and are to ***** to admit it.tigerstyle said:EDIT: Let this thread DIE. I evidently wasn't able to convey my curiosity properly and gather a proper response. People are taking it far too literally.
shows just how little you get it.it takes a much larger set of balls to be acting, singing, and dancing in front of people then it does to say, look down a microscope in a laboratory (nothing against science, at all! just an example).
Really? What was my intent, then? Apparently I didn't convey my REAL INTENT, and it came off to you in a completely different way. For that I apologize, really. But please, don't assume you know what my intent was; YOU ARE NOT ME.backbreaker said:you know good and damn well what the intent of this thread was, and are to ***** to admit it.
Don't worry, I'm not taking it personally. Actually, I UNDERSTAND where you are coming from... I'm just trying to make YOU understand that what you are accusing me of is simply NOT the case, as far as my intentions/curiosities were concerned. You'll just have to take my word for it man, quit trying to shove assumptions up my ass.backbreaker said:my problem isnt' with you.. it really isn't.. I just say what's on my mind.. dont' take it personal.
Alright, alright I am perfectly HAPPY to admit that that was a HORRIBLE example. My apologies. It's just the first one that popped into my mind, and on that note, it completely reflects MY experience. I've been behind a microscope a few times, and for ME, it takes LESS balls than DANCING in front of 2500 people in an auditorium. It was my bad to not take into account other peoples perspective on that particular example.backbreaker said:The fact that you even had the nerve to say: " it takes a much larger set of balls to be acting, singing, and dancing in front of people then it does to say, look down a microscope in a laboratory (nothing against science, at all! just an example)."
shows just how little you get it.
It takes balls to succeed in antyhing. Lots of hard work, dedication, studying, failure, nay sayers and pain.