"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

can attraction really be created ?

KneghtRyder

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
471
Reaction score
0
which train of thought do you follow

you pick a girl you think shes hot, and depending on the personality, demostrating confidence , the nice clothes and cars, being a MAN -- she WILL eventually be "turned on" to you...

or

she's got to be "turned on" before you open your mouth. The rest is following through, talk , and escalate talk and escalate. She's already decided to sleep with you , but you've just to follow the dating game through to its fruition.


In A) you pick her, in B) she picks you. In A) attraction can be created. in B) attaction is not created only exposed.



My opinion is a little mid-way between these two extremes, I don't think just ANY women will eventually become "turned on" to you if there are no initial signs of interest, but at the same time, I think women who do show signs on interest, you have to still game them TIGHT e.g. confidence, being a MAN, personality to even bring that interest to fruition.
If being a MAN, if showing confidence, or being ****y + funny makes you MORE attractive in her eyes, then I'd say pure "emotional" attraction can be created, but not physical attraction. As far as I can tell, emotional doesn't equate to physical attraction in women ,so real attaction isn't created.
B says you either have a connection to begin with, you just take up the offer so to speak.




what are your thoughts ? how are you defining 'attraction', in the physical or emotional sense or the total physical/emotiona/mental aspect
 

"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

rrrrr

Senior Don Juan
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
455
Reaction score
3
I would say this: If she's on the fence with you, then your personality and style is what will make or break you. If she's into your looks, then good personality, good game will make her crazy over you. If you're ugly, you either don't have a chance or she will be able to go past your looks. So for these reasons, I think that the principles and practices taught here and elsewhere, really make a difference.
 

Chemistry

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Messages
780
Reaction score
3
Location
International
Simple answer...

Yes

You're over-simplifying what attraction is... attraction is more than just looking at someone and finding them physically attractive... attraction is created by so many things which you can read about on the forums, or at least in the DJ Bible...
 

pornstar88

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I believe any guy could game any girl, that is supported by all of the times that i have seen hb 10's with ugly ****s. I have friends that are the best lookin guys gaming the hottest girls in school. There is this girl in my school is literally the hottest girl in our school who is dating the ugliest fattest white guy ever.

If you really break down someones looks, and really take a good look at them the hottest stars out there arent really that hott. Vida guerra has a nice ass but her face ainy to die for. But most guys dont really see that because if you look at her as a total package everything else looks better. Also another thing that makes her look better is the hype behind her name, guys say to themsleves sub-consciously everyone else likes her so I like her. HYPE helps you alot, and how do you build up hype as a male. Being dominant or and alpha, truthfully you dont have to look good to be an alpha you just have to be dominant. So whatever you dont have in looks you have to make up for in hype/dominance. Thats why i buy into A because women really have no choice in who they like attraction is attraction there is no "but im not gonna give him a chance cuz hes ugly" cuz you can build attraction off of your dominance and personality. And once shes attracted she is attracted to you.
 

pagemaster

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
KneghtRyder said:
which train of thought do you follow

you pick a girl you think shes hot, and depending on the personality, demostrating confidence , the nice clothes and cars, being a MAN -- she WILL eventually be "turned on" to you...

or

she's got to be "turned on" before you open your mouth. The rest is following through, talk , and escalate talk and escalate. She's already decided to sleep with you , but you've just to follow the dating game through to its fruition.


In A) you pick her, in B) she picks you. In A) attraction can be created. in B) attaction is not created only exposed.



My opinion is a little mid-way between these two extremes, I don't think just ANY women will eventually become "turned on" to you if there are no initial signs of interest, but at the same time, I think women who do show signs on interest, you have to still game them TIGHT e.g. confidence, being a MAN, personality to even bring that interest to fruition.
If being a MAN, if showing confidence, or being ****y + funny makes you MORE attractive in her eyes, then I'd say pure "emotional" attraction can be created, but not physical attraction. As far as I can tell, emotional doesn't equate to physical attraction in women ,so real attaction isn't created.
B says you either have a connection to begin with, you just take up the offer so to speak.




what are your thoughts ? how are you defining 'attraction', in the physical or emotional sense or the total physical/emotiona/mental aspect
In my opinion there are two different ways they will be attracted. Either they will be physically attracted right off the bat or they will eventually become attracted mentally.

My preference is the girls that eventually get attracted to me because they tend to last much longer then the girls that are only attracted physically.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Top