"She Liked You in March. It's October Now."

Attraction runs on a clock.

She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.

The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."

One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.

Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.

Read more...

Brain buster!!!lol check it out

check_mate_kid_uk

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
2,077
Reaction score
4
Location
UK
My reasoning was that the restruant owner has $25 left, each travler has $1 and the waitress $2 which adds up to $30

Turbro is correct because 25/3 is 8.33 which is what it should have cost, 1 is what each travller got back 8.33*3 + 1*3 = $28 now add the $2 the waitress kept and oyu get your $30
 

“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,104
Reaction score
28
Re: Re: Re: Brain buster!!!lol check it out

Originally posted by spider_007
i thought the actuall amount spent was 25? (30-5=25)
They were charged $25 after the refund and the waitress only gave them $3 back and pocketed $2. The only money "in play" due to the greedy thieving waitress was $28. I Just subtracted that right off the bat because it became irrelevent to the math problem.

Then I divided the money "in play" by 3 to determine what each person actually paid and subtracted $1 from that.

Oh...and my other post SHOULD read NOT including the $2 the waitress pocketed. I had a typo, so it sounds a bit funky. I just noticed it now...
 

manuva

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
527
Reaction score
9
Location
Australia
God I can't believe it lol.

They each pay 10, they each get 1 back. That equals 9 each. Not 8.66, not 9.33, but 9 flat.

If you don't believe me, check it on your calculator. 10-1=9.

Three guys each ended up paying 27 when they actually only had to pay 25. So where did the surplus 2 go? It's in the waitresses pocket. 27-2=25

Quit saying they've each payed a fraction of a dollar - they haven't!! It's perfectly obvious that having given 10 and had 1 returned to them they've paid 9.

The answer doesn't lie in inventing weird fractions of dollars, the answer lies in recognizing that you subract 2 from 27 to get 25 (the amound left in the till), NOT add 2 to 27.
 

S-lemond

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
536
Reaction score
0
Age
37
i just got done with school!
 

oOh Nasty

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 23, 2002
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
353
Age
40
Originally posted by manuva
God I can't believe it lol.

They each pay 10, they each get 1 back. That equals 9 each. Not 8.66, not 9.33, but 9 flat.

If you don't believe me, check it on your calculator. 10-1=9.

Three guys each ended up paying 27 when they actually only had to pay 25. So where did the surplus 2 go? It's in the waitresses pocket. 27-2=25

Quit saying they've each payed a fraction of a dollar - they haven't!! It's perfectly obvious that having given 10 and had 1 returned to them they've paid 9.

The answer doesn't lie in inventing weird fractions of dollars, the answer lies in recognizing that you subract 2 from 27 to get 25 (the amound left in the till), NOT add 2 to 27.
Correct.

People are making it more complicated for themselves than they have to. The solution has more to do with how you see the problem rather than any mathematical processes.

:moon:
 

"You'll Never Feel READY to Walk Over"

Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.

You've been "getting ready" for two years.

She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.

Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.

Read more...

Top