"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"

You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.

She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.

Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.

Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.

Read more...

Brain buster!!!lol check it out

check_mate_kid_uk

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
2,077
Reaction score
4
Location
UK
My reasoning was that the restruant owner has $25 left, each travler has $1 and the waitress $2 which adds up to $30

Turbro is correct because 25/3 is 8.33 which is what it should have cost, 1 is what each travller got back 8.33*3 + 1*3 = $28 now add the $2 the waitress kept and oyu get your $30
 

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

Wyldfire

Banned
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
9,104
Reaction score
28
Re: Re: Re: Brain buster!!!lol check it out

Originally posted by spider_007
i thought the actuall amount spent was 25? (30-5=25)
They were charged $25 after the refund and the waitress only gave them $3 back and pocketed $2. The only money "in play" due to the greedy thieving waitress was $28. I Just subtracted that right off the bat because it became irrelevent to the math problem.

Then I divided the money "in play" by 3 to determine what each person actually paid and subtracted $1 from that.

Oh...and my other post SHOULD read NOT including the $2 the waitress pocketed. I had a typo, so it sounds a bit funky. I just noticed it now...
 

manuva

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
527
Reaction score
9
Location
Australia
God I can't believe it lol.

They each pay 10, they each get 1 back. That equals 9 each. Not 8.66, not 9.33, but 9 flat.

If you don't believe me, check it on your calculator. 10-1=9.

Three guys each ended up paying 27 when they actually only had to pay 25. So where did the surplus 2 go? It's in the waitresses pocket. 27-2=25

Quit saying they've each payed a fraction of a dollar - they haven't!! It's perfectly obvious that having given 10 and had 1 returned to them they've paid 9.

The answer doesn't lie in inventing weird fractions of dollars, the answer lies in recognizing that you subract 2 from 27 to get 25 (the amound left in the till), NOT add 2 to 27.
 

S-lemond

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
536
Reaction score
0
Age
37
i just got done with school!
 

oOh Nasty

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 23, 2002
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
353
Age
40
Originally posted by manuva
God I can't believe it lol.

They each pay 10, they each get 1 back. That equals 9 each. Not 8.66, not 9.33, but 9 flat.

If you don't believe me, check it on your calculator. 10-1=9.

Three guys each ended up paying 27 when they actually only had to pay 25. So where did the surplus 2 go? It's in the waitresses pocket. 27-2=25

Quit saying they've each payed a fraction of a dollar - they haven't!! It's perfectly obvious that having given 10 and had 1 returned to them they've paid 9.

The answer doesn't lie in inventing weird fractions of dollars, the answer lies in recognizing that you subract 2 from 27 to get 25 (the amound left in the till), NOT add 2 to 27.
Correct.

People are making it more complicated for themselves than they have to. The solution has more to do with how you see the problem rather than any mathematical processes.

:moon:
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

Top