Biggest divorce settlement in history.......

[speed dawg]

http://news.yahoo.com/special-report-lack-prenup-imperils-oil-billionaires-fortune-100200497.html

To look at the positive, it will probably be good for the economy, you know the dumb b*tch will spend it all.

 

[Fatal Jay]

I don't feel sorry for these greedy rich bastards

 

[Robert28]

you'd have to be a moron to be that wealthy and get married, to a lawyer no less. double facepalm.

 

[Stagger Lee]

What I don't get is the richest and most powerful men have the most to lose with marriage and divorce and child support laws the way they are now. They usually being high profile also have a requirement nowadays still to be married for the image aspect at least and to be socially acceptable.

So WTF do the rich and powerful who lobby for all kinds of things tolerate (if not created) the divorce laws?

If this doesn't prove that women control everything, I don't know what does. Even the wealthiest and most powerful men march in lock step to the feminist agenda. Heck many of them even promote the feminist agenda.

It's insane. A women files divorce and takes half of a man's assets that he earned through no help of hers. If a woman wants a divorce, she should leave with whatever assets she came into the marriage with or if anything she should forfeit everything for wanting to divorce. That would sure teach women. They wouldn't file divorces and would act way better if they knew the man could file for divorce and take HIS assets with him.

I don't feel sorry for these greedy rich bastards

I don't either mostly because they don't oppose this feminist crap. But I certainly don't support the greedy rich biches.

 

[Mike32ct]

Even with a prenup, she probably wouldn't marry him unless some $$ (less than half) would be hers if they got divorced. Heads she wins. Tails she wins.

 

[Upside]

What I don't get is the richest and most powerful men have the most to lose with marriage and divorce and child support laws the way they are now. They usually being high profile also have a requirement nowadays still to be married for the image aspect at least and to be socially acceptable.

So WTF do the rich and powerful who lobby for all kinds of things tolerate (if not created) the divorce laws?

If this doesn't prove that women control everything, I don't know what does. Even the wealthiest and most powerful men march in lock step to the feminist agenda. Heck many of them even promote the feminist agenda.

It's insane. A women files divorce and takes half of a man's assets that he earned through no help of hers. If a woman wants a divorce, she should leave with whatever assets she came into the marriage with or if anything she should forfeit everything for wanting to divorce. That would sure teach women. They wouldn't file divorces and would act way better if they knew the man could file for divorce and take HIS assets with him.



I don't either mostly because they don't oppose this feminist crap. But I certainly don't support the greedy rich biches.

Lower and middle class men have more to lose in divorce than those who are rich. Think about it. Losing half of 50K a year is a severe detriment to quality of life, while losing half of like 5 billion isn't. At a certain point, the effect of money on ones life becomes marginal to a point where a person may not even have to look at the price tags of anything.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Lower and middle class men have more to lose in divorce than those who are rich. Think about it. Losing half of 50K a year is a severe detriment to quality of life, while losing half of like 5 billion isn't. At a certain point, the effect of money on ones life becomes marginal to a point where a person may not even have to look at the price tags of anything.

I don't disagree that the lower and middle class men as usual are hit the hardest by it. But still, I don't see why the rich and powerful, who tend to want to hold on to their money and power, would tolerate divorce and other pro-female/anti-male laws so well. You don't get rich and powerful normally by being generous and letting others take a share they deserve let alone don't deserve.

The rich generally sure don't like handing their money and power away, but if it is a woman then no problem. Women own and control all men, from the poor and powerless to the most rich and powerful. Meanwhile all men are divided and actively trying to prevent other men from acquiring women and resources.

I'm not sure which is the bigger factor, women's iron rule over men or men divided and working against each other. It's like the chicken or the egg first, but you need both for it to exist.