http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paQ4fAd3qg8
Dr Robert Gallo invented AIDS/Ebola through manipulations of type c cancer
Dr Robert Gallo invented AIDS/Ebola through manipulations of type c cancer
“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
Beware the ebola propaganda
- Thread starter Burroughs
- Start date
backbreaker
Master Don Juan
Aids maybe, Ebola has been around for tens of thousands of years, maybe not the exact strain but the family of viruses has and it's quite well documented.Burroughs said:
ebola is also not only found in other primates, there are about 10 different stains of ebola it's nto like aids/hiv ebola virus is really a classification of a family of viruses that share genetic similarities. there are some that are harmless to hus but 100% fatal to other mammals/primates, there are some that are less harmless to other primates but deadly to us.
the one found in Zaire is the most potent it kills 90% of it's victums.
there is no factual way that ebola was manufactured by scientists. i can see an argument for AIDS but event hen i don't think it was on purpose.
i have always had a somewhat twisted fascination with ebola which is why i know so much about it.
As backbreaker said you can't even make the argument for ebola.
What purpose would engineering AIDS, a disease that since its discovery, has predominantly affected gay men in America, and subSaharan Africa?
Or that a full year before Gallo even submitted a paper about HIV, that a French team had already published the discovery of that virus a year prior?
Or that the only reason Gallo discovered HIV was because he acquired it from a sample from that very French lab?
"The conclusion was that virus used in Gallo's lab had come from Montagnier's lab, a patient virus that had contaminated a virus from another patient. On request, Montagnier's group had sent a sample of this culture to Gallo, not knowing it contained two viruses. It then contaminated the pooled culture on which Gallo was working."
Or that the first known case of AIDS was 1959, the same year in which Robert Gallo was still working on his Bachelor's degree, let alone his MD. So that effectively rules out him creating it.
"The earliest well documented case of HIV in a human dates back to 1959 in the Congo.[182] The virus may have been present in the United States as early as 1966,[183] but the vast majority of infections occurring outside sub-Saharan Africa (including the U.S.) can be traced back to a single unknown individual who got infected with HIV in Haiti and then brought the infection to the United States some time around 1969.[184] The epidemic then rapidly spread among high-risk groups (initially, sexually promiscuous men who have sex with men). By 1978, the prevalence of HIV-1 among gay male residents of New York and San Francisco was estimated at 5%, suggesting that several thousand individuals in the country had been infected.[184]"
"Robert Gallo Providence College (B.S.; 1959)"
What purpose would engineering AIDS, a disease that since its discovery, has predominantly affected gay men in America, and subSaharan Africa?
Or that a full year before Gallo even submitted a paper about HIV, that a French team had already published the discovery of that virus a year prior?
Or that the only reason Gallo discovered HIV was because he acquired it from a sample from that very French lab?
"The conclusion was that virus used in Gallo's lab had come from Montagnier's lab, a patient virus that had contaminated a virus from another patient. On request, Montagnier's group had sent a sample of this culture to Gallo, not knowing it contained two viruses. It then contaminated the pooled culture on which Gallo was working."
Or that the first known case of AIDS was 1959, the same year in which Robert Gallo was still working on his Bachelor's degree, let alone his MD. So that effectively rules out him creating it.
"The earliest well documented case of HIV in a human dates back to 1959 in the Congo.[182] The virus may have been present in the United States as early as 1966,[183] but the vast majority of infections occurring outside sub-Saharan Africa (including the U.S.) can be traced back to a single unknown individual who got infected with HIV in Haiti and then brought the infection to the United States some time around 1969.[184] The epidemic then rapidly spread among high-risk groups (initially, sexually promiscuous men who have sex with men). By 1978, the prevalence of HIV-1 among gay male residents of New York and San Francisco was estimated at 5%, suggesting that several thousand individuals in the country had been infected.[184]"
"Robert Gallo Providence College (B.S.; 1959)"
backbreaker
Master Don Juan
and the thing about ebola is that, for as many stains of it that there is, that's not something you do in a lab and it's something that takes thousands and thousands if not millions of years of evolution to evole to. each strain of ebolavirus is uniquely different for the region that it's found in.
even if someone was to get in a lab and cook up 8 different stains of ebobla virus, the odds that they would automatically be restricted to certain areas is about statistically impossible.
even if someone was to get in a lab and cook up 8 different stains of ebobla virus, the odds that they would automatically be restricted to certain areas is about statistically impossible.
Talk about spreading propaganda. AIDS contains ancient tiger DNA, which conclusively proves AIDS has been around for thousands or millions of years. You really need to stop listening to idiots and liars, because it’s making you into both.
http://health.usnews.com/health-new...009/12/06/aids-may-date-back-to-ancient-tiger
In reasoning, the burden of proof rests upon people making a claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Let’s hear it.
In reasoning, the burden of proof rests upon people making a claim, so the burden of proof is on you. Let’s hear it.