kickureface
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2006
- Messages
- 713
- Reaction score
- 1
i don't know much about directing, but iwould like to see some good directed films to see what it's all about, instead of the gunk that usually comes out in theatres.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Which one? The original with Orson Wells and Peter Sellers, or the recent remake?mr_elor said:One most people would think of, but Casino Royale definitely. That films damn near perfect, and that of course extends to the direction. The film is well paced, and manages to keep potentially boring poker scenes interesting. The action is filmed well too, none of this shaky camera rubbish that ruins a good action/fight scene. There's other reasons too, but yeah, Casino Royale is pretty damn well directed.
They're completely different cogs in the same machine. The Cinematographer is responsible for the lighting aspect and the framing of a particular shot.kickureface said:what exactly is good directing and cinemetography