article: Why I Want To Marry Rich

[MatureDJ]

http://www.learnvest.com/money-tuneup/career/money-mic-i-want-to-marry-a-millionaire/

To allay your doubts, I am a staunch feminist at every turn. To me, feminism is the belief that women are people who deserve basic and equivalent rights in accordance with those granted to the opposite sex.

But let me guess - if I were a rich guy and I wanted to marry a woman with big t!ts, I wouldn't be a chauvinist pig? :crackup:

 

[backbreaker]

what i find amusing is the blinders that Americans, hell people look at things with

no one, hell her own friends and family probably don't think too bad about her position, yet if she were to decide to be an escort, she would go to jail, when in reality it's the same thing

she's a hoe. she acknowledges pretty much she brings nothing to the table but conversation and poon. I can get that at the local strip club and probably get it better, and not have to worry about divorce papers.

though she is getting raked over the coals pretty bad by both men and women.

truth be told, there is a little bit of hoe in every woman. There isn't a woman that wouldn't rather move up if she had the opportunity. But the better ones (women not hoes), know that they have to bring something to the table to. that is actually what the outcry is more than her wanting to marry for money. I don't think that's much of a shock. But the nerve to just stay "here i am, 23 year old woman in all her spender, i am worth this" and she isn't.

 

[Lexington]

There was a pretty funny post I read on this site that relates to this. Basically, some 25 year old woman claimed that she was gorgeous and was looking for someone making a minimum of $500k per year.

A wealthy guy responded. He pointed out that there were a couple of problems with her offer. 1) her beauty is transient while his wealth will grow in perpetuity, so it's not an equitable trade 2) he was a believer in the efficient market hypothesis- if she was so gorgeous, his come she hadn't been sapped up already?

Utlimately, leasing rather than buying would be a better deal.

 

[SteR]

There was a pretty funny post I read on this site that relates to this. Basically, some 25 year old woman claimed that she was gorgeous and was looking for someone making a minimum of $500k per year.

A wealthy guy responded. He pointed out that there were a couple of problems with her offer. 1) her beauty is transient while his wealth will grow in perpetuity, so it's not an equitable trade 2) he was a believer in the efficient market hypothesis- if she was so gorgeous, his come she hadn't been sapped up already?

Utlimately, leasing rather than buying would be a better deal.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/sex/a/gold_digger.htm

 

[Burroughs]

Utlimately, leasing rather than buying would be a better deal.

legal, amsterdam style prostitution would be a watershed moment for men. It would be a sharp kick to the teeth towards a 100 years of feminism.

 

[backbreaker]

"honey, we have been dating now for a year but already know that you are the one, so i have one question to ask you

(gets on one knee)


Can I lease you?"


5 year renewable leases would be the turning point in society. would put lawyers out of business, would make marriage much more attractive.


you fall "out of love" suck that **** up until the lease is over. if you cheat on the lease you get NOTHING.

all the legal benefits of marriage without the til death do us part issue.

 

[Burroughs]

If you held women in marriages to the same standards as partners in a corporation (not Worldcom, Enron, et al obviously) women would not receive alimony they would be in jail for fraud.

 

[Strelok]

legal, amsterdam style prostitution would be a watershed moment for men. It would be a sharp kick to the teeth towards a 100 years of feminism.

This

"honey, we have been dating now for a year but already know that you are the one, so i have one question to ask you

(gets on one knee)


Can I lease you?"


5 year renewable leases would be the turning point in society. would put lawyers out of business, would make marriage much more attractive.


you fall "out of love" suck that **** up until the lease is over. if you cheat on the lease you get NOTHING.

all the legal benefits of marriage without the til death do us part issue.

And this

If you held women in marriages to the same standards as partners in a corporation (not Worldcom, Enron, et al obviously) women would not receive alimony they would be in jail for fraud.

If you held women everywhere to the same standards as partners in anything they would insulted and reproached if not kicked.

Seriously, what would you do to a man who ask for a meeting and then doesnt show up without notice? would you say "go no contact" or "have a contact with his jaw"?

No matter how few honor a man has, he knows that not keeping his word have conseguences, a women will have the courage to complain at you cause you dared to point out her lack of respect.
Let alone expecting her to apologize.

 

[Burroughs]

would you say "go no contact" or "have a contact with his jaw"?

This is the thing most men don't understand..read history with few exception ise..for 2 million + years of mankind's reign on Earth, men ruled women with a strong pimp hand, disobey...slap! You're done. Cheat...sorry darlin you're out on the street starvin'. In short women were property and civilization grew.

Go to India, China, Sumatra, Fiji, rural Japan, Eastern Europe...wives are punished for having too much water in the rice!

And we talk about alpha!

Lets see how feminism fares when the lights go out, bread is gone, oil is dry, and women must once more huddle with men for their lives.

 

[Zarky]

I have no problem with that woman, I'm looking to marry rich too!

If I were to marry a woman, she'd have to be extremely beautiful and extremely rich.

if I were a rich guy and I wanted to marry a woman with big t!ts, I wouldn't be a chauvinist pig?

Only betas care about what women think.